Preview

Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong
The Death Penalty is Criminal
A man sits waiting for his execution. He has been found guilty of murder and the government sees it fit that he should be punished in the same way. But wait- doesn’t an eye for an eye leave the whole world blind? What if this man was falsely accused and he is innocent? He could be an upstanding citizen and a positive attribute to society. He might even have a family of his own to care and provide for. Capital punishment exists because some believe it deters crime. If criminals know their punishment will be death, they will not commit murder. Some believe a death for a death is fair. They believe it gives some closure and peace because the murderer is rid of forever. And that though it might be expensive, it
…show more content…
Being Catholic and taught social justice in high school, I learned that it is important to forgive and that it is also wrong to end another person’s life. Theologians believe it is not our right as humans to decide when someone else should die. Catholics get most of their beliefs from the Word of Jesus Christ and He also teaches us to be forgiving and understanding because we are all sinners. Christ leads by example by forgiving his enemies and executors while dying on the cross for their sins: “Father forgive them, for they know not what they do.” He also intervened to prevent capital punishment when he challenged those who would put to death a woman accused of wrongdoing: “Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her” (Christian Theologians Take a Stand Against the Death Penalty). It is said that the death penalty gives closure to the victim 's families. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the loss of a loved one. Judy Kerr, whose brother was murdered, recognized that “the death penalty [would not] bring [her] brother back or help to apprehend his murderer.” She suggested that governments invest in programs that will “actually improve public safety and get more killers off the streets” (Quotes by Families of Homicide Victims). Wouldn’t family and friends feel more at peace if they grew to forgive the person, regardless of the crime? New Hampshire …show more content…
What happens if an innocent person is convicted of murder and is executed for something they did not even do? That person could be the parent of a child or a brother or sister who is a good citizen of society. On August 26, 2008, Michael Blair of Texas became the 130th person released from death row with evidence of innocence since 1973 (Effectiveness of the Death Penalty). Dozens of others have either been released through probable innocence or had their sentences shortened due to possible innocence. Of the more than 1,000 people executed since 1976, how many could have also been innocent? More than a few documented cases exist where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government. Mentally ill patients may also be put to death. Many people are born with brain defects that cause them to act a certain way and it is not fair that someone should be executed just because they were unlucky enough to be born with a mental illness. It still must be proven to the judge and jury that the defendant is mentally ill although it is technically unconstitutional to put a mentally ill patient to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Such mistakes that have been made must be prevented for the future, so that the innocent don 't continue to suffer. In fact, the Innocence Project, an organization that emphasizes the faults in our death penalty system, states that the inmates falsely accused of their crimes "...were convicted in 11 states and served a combined 209 years in prison – including 187 years on death row – for crimes they didn’t commit." (Innocence Project). To be exonerated after years and years must leave unfathomable mental trauma. If that many innocent people have been forced to wait on the edge of death for this long, it wouldn 't be hard to believe that some won 't be lucky enough to be saved from the mistakes of our unacceptably inefficient court system. Killing a person, even sentencing them to death, is only just if they truly deserve it. That is what Dexter argues, yet our country continues to ineffectively implicate capital punishment by making the innocent suffer through unnecessary torture. We must end capital punishment, or at least make it more efficient. There are lives at…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” ( J.R.R. Tolkien). No one knows the exact number of innocent people that were executed. However, since 1973, 156 people Have been exonerated. In the article, Governor Ryan’s Execution Moratorium in Illinois: Killing the Innocent, Governor George Ryan reduced the sentences of inmates facing capital punishment in Illinois. The anti-death penalty citizens praised the governor. Many people are innocent on death row. The innocence projects work extremely hard help those wrongly convicted. The innocence project members are lawyers and good citizens who work to find the truth using DNA testing. Sadly, sometimes…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soc120 Week 3

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A number of people are claimed to have been innocent victims of the death penalty. Newly-available DNA evidence has allowed the exoneration and release of more than 15 death row inmates since 1992 in the United States, but DNA evidence is available in only a fraction of capital cases. Others have been released on the basis of weak cases against them, sometimes involving prosecutorial misconduct; resulting in acquittal at retrial, charges dropped, or innocence-based pardons. The Death Penalty Information Center (U.S.) has published a list of 10 inmates "executed but possibly innocent". At least 39 executions are claimed to have been carried out in the U.S. in the face of evidence of innocence or serious doubt about guilt. Statistics likely understate the actual problem of wrongful convictions because once an execution has occurred there is often insufficient motivation and finance to keep a case open, and it becomes unlikely at that point that the miscarriage of justice will ever be exposed.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No matter what is the crime people commit they are still people. As people die over the world the world cannot pause and grieve forever. Capital punishment is over looked by the general public because they assume that if you are facing capital punishment you are a horrible criminal. But when you look in a humanitarian sense the criminal is just like any other person. No mistake is too horrible that it justifies taking another human…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dictionary defines the death penalty as punishment for someone convicted of a capital crime. Dating back to centuries ago, any capital crime such as murder, rape, drug trafficking were not tolerated by any means and were immediately sentenced to death. “An eye for an eye” was the typical argument that defended the side that the punishment should equal the crime. In an article written by Louis Pojman, he defends the death penalty with his own “eye for an eye” theory. His reasoning is that he believes humans are logical creatures who make the logical choice to commit a muder, therefore giving up their right to live. Pojman argues that the death penalty is a good deterrent for potential…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every convicted felon waiting on death row costs the American people over nine million dollars yearly to imprison. Such an absurd amount of money should be spent on the rehabilitation of these troubled individuals rather than in prolonging their lives only for their own demise. Before reverting to the early philosophy of Hammurabi “an eye for an eye” America should look to its own foundation, the constitution, as well as compare the costs and benefits of such a policy being legal. Despite enormous protections offered by the federal and states constitutions throughout the United States, many people have been executed in spite of evidence of their innocence. When capital punishment is concerned, most Americans believe our criminal system is close to infallible. Many assume that if factual errors do occur at trial, they will be discovered and corrected by higher courts. People believe that the innocent are rarely wrongly convicted and they are certainly not executed. Unfortunately, there is a large numbers of innocents people who…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major purpose of the death penalty is to punish people for their horrible crimes. However, the death penalty has put many innocent people on death row. Since 1973, 156 people have been exonerated (released from death row/evidence shows they aren’t guilty). The average time between getting the death sentence and exoneration is about 11 years. This is already terrible, forcing innocent people to believe that their life is nearly over, because of a crime that they didn’t commit, but it gets worse. It is very likely that people living in the United States have been wrongly executed. Multiple cases have evidence that proves that the “criminal” is actually innocent. In 1991, the house of Cameron Todd Willingham was destroyed by a fire, killing the three children who were sleeping inside. Willingham escaped and his wife was shopping at the time. Prosecutors stated that Willingham had purposefully set the house on fire to cover up the abuse of his children. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004. However, there is a proof that shows that the fire was not caused by Willingham. Unfortunately, nothing can be done now because these people have already been executed, but it does teach us one thing: If the death penalty cannot be used to punish the real offender and risks the lives of innocent people in the process, it can’t be used by our…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Murder Is Wrong

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is an understanding that murder is bad and should be punished and dealt with in an appropriate manner. Murder itself is wrong because one person is taking away someone's life and Murder is one of the most vindictive crimes in the world and can leave a big affect on many people. In the bible one of the ten commandments is thou shalt not kill, so when someone takes another person's life they are breaking that commandment. The only time a person should be held accountable for a murder in a indirect sense is when the person is committing a crime, but shouldn't if they so happen to kill a person for a natural cause like someone driving has a stroke and hits someone. This is an action that should be looked at like the person didn't kill him…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty in Peru

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, death penalty has pros and some are these. It is allowable because the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed. As consequence, death penalty is going to stop criminals from murdering. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his/her life. Many people will agree that death penalty is just and fair. Additionally, the death penalty can lower crime, and is not an evil punishment, it’s the person who committed such a crime who deserves the death penalty.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the death penalty is not effective because you could mistake an innocent person for a criminal. This would mean that the person would die for something he/she he never did and then when they figure out that they got the wrong person they try to compensate their family. This is very wrong because it they are taking the life of an innocent man/woman and paying back their families as if they are animals. I think that this could be the same as a person who kills a farmer’s cow and then pays the farmer for it.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays