Preview

Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong
Naomi Charles
Ms. Becci Ambore, MA
ENG 121-345
22 April 2015
Capital punishment argument Why is it that some criminals serve time in jail for their actions and others are sentenced to death? For a long time capital punishment has been used in the U.S and other countries as a form of punishment for crime. Some offenses punishable by death are murder, treason, espionage and machine gunning. Many countries have abolished the use of capital punishment believing it to be an unfair inhumane act. Capital punishment is wrong because it puts innocent lives at risk and it does not deter crimes from happening. The solution is to abolish the death penalty and sentence criminals to life in prison without possibility of parole. Many agree that the death penalty is not wrong because it keeps innocent people safe and the threat of death does deter crime from happening.
The death penalty is a problem because innocent people can be put to death for being wrongly accused of committing a crime. Sometimes innocent people are blamed for crimes they did not commit because of racial prejudice and police misconduct. A large amount of people who have been on death
…show more content…
To get rid of the death penalty would free criminals of the consequences of committing atrocious crimes. Capital punishment deters criminals from committing heinous crimes because criminals value their life just like anyone else. Criminals who receive the death penalty usually try to have their sentence changed to life in prison. People feel bad for someone who receives the death penalty but they do not realize how dangerous and cold blooded that person can be. Criminals know they are vulnerable so they have to try and gain sympathy by saying that they did not think about the consequences of his actions. This might show that capital punishment deters crimes from happening because if a criminal thinks about the consequences of his actions it might keep him from harming

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Barnett, A. (1981, March - April). The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Test of Some Recent Studies. Retrieved February 17, 2010, from JSTOR - Trusted Archives For Scholarship: http://www.jstor.org…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion the death penalty violates the right to life. What is capital punishment? In its simplest form it is defined as the State, or Government of the time, legislating that premeditated murder is punishable by death. Capital punishment has not been proven to function as a deterrent. In this argument, I will put forward my case that the death penalty is immoral and has no place in civilised society.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The gains associated with capital punishment are the affect it can have on effectively deterring criminals from not only murderer, but any serious crime (Cameron 1989). It is used as an intimidation factor for which people weigh the cost and benefits of their actions, and in a case where the cost is their life, the probability of them committing a crime will decrease (Shepherd 2004). The significant relationship it shares with the homicide rate has been found that 150 fewer homicides take place in reaction to one execution happening to a convicted murderer (Cooter and Ulen 2012). Looking at this relationship directly from an economic perspective, capital punishment can be seen as a commodity; an increase in it leads to an increase in consumer welfare as it decreases the chance of another victim being murdered (Cameron 1993). The effect that deterrence has on society is seen as a public good as well because of the positive, widespread affect it has on a larger number of consumers by increases their safety and security. By increasing the amount of resources the government puts towards conviction and punishment for criminal activities, it will allow for a reduction in harm (Cooter and Ulen 2012) and allow the demand for protection and a safer environment to be met. Capital punishment is the strongest alternative of punishment to create the largest deterrent…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    notices. Naturally, people in court or in prison will go on and on about their innocence when they know well that they did it. This causes the innocent people 's claims of innocence to be discarded. One may then spend half of his life in prison or be put to death. No normal people ever take the time to think that they may be next. If the death sentence was discarded, a few lives could be saved. Technology is advancing everyday and with DNA samples and other high-tech equipment, people could be proven innocent. Most people believe that the "bad guy" kills illegally and the "good guy", or the gas chamber, kills legally.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pojman Death Penalty

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages

    It is the idea that by killing convicted murderers it would stop possible murderers from killing innocent people, therefore saving innocent lives. Even though there is no evidence to show deterrence it is pretty obvious that deterrence would happen with capital punishment. In his argument for capital punishment Pojman brings up the lightening scenario. Which is a scenario where every time a person commits murder there are then struck and killed by a bolt of lightening. If fellow future murderers see every murderer being struck by lightening then it would most likely deter them from committing that offense. It is clear that that situation would lower the number of United States murders drastically. This shows that if there are more executions that are known to the public then it will be clear that murder is never worth it. Again common sense would seem to show that dying because of the death penalty would be more of a deterrent than regular prison time. If a criminal is expecting to only be put in jail rather than being put to death he may be more likely to commit a horrible crime. Pojman also shows a quote from Judge Hyman Barshay which paraphrased was that the death penalty is like a lighthouse, we know about the shipwrecks but we don’t know how many ships were saved. We will never know how many people don’t commit murders because of the threat of the…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In fact, “Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row, including some who came within minutes of execution.” That’s 138 out of the 1,427 sentenced, by the way. I don’t think this is necessarily a death penalty issue though. I feel it’s more of a testimony or due process problem, if anything. Perhaps the cases of these innocent men and woman were not thoroughly investigated or given a fair enough…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Eye for an Eye For many years there has been a constant debate between supporters and non-supporters of the death penalty. Many people argue that the death penalty is as much a murder as the crime committed by the offender. Others may say that it provides closure and justice. I am a strong supporter of the death penalty. There are many others like myself. The world is full of the most dangerous and ruthless criminals that should be put to death. There are many pros that the death penalty has to offer that make the world a better place to live. The death penalty is proven to deter crime. Many individuals think twice before committing a crime because of the death penalty. Spectators that have witnessed an execution say that watching an execution has changed their lives. Spectators can advise others to refrain from doing crimes by telling others of their experience. Prison is one place where many people would not expect crime, but sadly there is as much crime in prison as there is on the outside. The death penalty deters inmates from committing crimes in prison because the death penalty can still be added on to their sentence. Crimes are also deterred in prison because some of the most ruthless criminals are isolated and are on death row. Criminologist state that when execution rates go up, murder rates go down. Criminologists also state that each execution deters eighteen murders. Many experts state that speeding up executions would deter crime at a much faster rate. There has been an overall drop in homicides. Nationally the decline was 2.7 percent. With cities that have populations over one million murder rates have declined 9.8 percent. The death penalty also gives families of murder victims’ closure and justice. Many families say that the death penalty is a deterrent in crime. Many families say that even though they feel relief after the murderers’ death, the pain of a lost loved one will never go away. Families want closure and do not…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has not been proven to deter crime and it opens the possibility of executing innocent people. That is why the United States of America should abolish the death penalty.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O 'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to a group of women lawyers in Minnesota "the system may well be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed” (“Innocence”). It has been said that if capital punishment disappears in the United States it won’t be because voters and politicians no longer want to execute the guilty (Douthat 7). It will be because they 're afraid of executing the innocent (Douthat 7). "A government that cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy of its proceedings should not take to itself the power of taking a human life," said Senator Martin Looney, referring to the Tillman case (Williams 55-56). While interviewing certain people about this issue there was a statement made by a person that really caught my attention she said “...The death penalty should not be a closure to a family because another person is being killed, when God should be the one making that decision. Remember, two wrongs don’t make a…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an issue that has continually caused tension in today’s society. The main discussion over this is whether or not the death penalty serves as a valid and justified form of punishment. We have reached the point where if the topic is brought up, extremists on both sides immediately begin to argue the matter. One side says increase in crime rate, the other says failure to discourage crime; one says failure to rehabilitate, the other says it saves lives; one says justice and retribution, the other says revenge. As a society we know that crime is a major part of our lives, and we are all aware that something must be done about it. The only problem now is coming together and finding common ground as to how we solve it. The death penalty has been applied by many parts of the world, from the ancient times of Babylon to present day America. More than an estimated 15, 269 Americans have been executed since the inception of the death penalty dating back to colonial times. History has shown us that capital punishment, whose definition is the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment, is a very efficient and acceptable means of reducing crime.…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric way to stop crime. Most kids have heard the expression “do not fight fire with fire.” Using the death penalty is doing just that. Punishing criminals for murder by doing exactly what landed them in jail in the first place seems counterproductive. Instead, making felons live in prison, reflecting on their actions, gives them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. No one would be able to live with themselves if they were involved with an innocent man being wrongfully executed. Eliminating capital punishment would make that fear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Murder Is Wrong

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Murder is wrong. Since we were kids we have been told this. So what exactly is capital punishment? It is described as one person taking the life another. It is undeniably paradoxical that the state will allow the execution of a person as a quick fix to crime and violence.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment imposes justification for punishment with retribution in the form of a life for a life. Capital punishment is a very controversial issue because of its effects on society. Many believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to murderer; however, according to Nygard K. (1996) "… states with active capital punishment have a stable, higher rate of homicide than those without capital punishment. Nygard K. (1996) asserts that… Research revealed that homicide rates actually escalate after a criminal has been executed. Givens M. (1992) points out a noteworthy disadvantage to retribution… Capital punishment is irreversible and a person that has been wrongfully judged and put to death can not be brought back to…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays