Preview

Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong
Capital punishment is a government sanctioned way to legally kill someone as punishment for a crime they have done. The death penalty is meant to initiate criminals pay for their crimes, prevent any future crimes, and to show other criminals what will happen if they achieve a crime that will lead to the death penalty. Nevertheless, capital punishment is wrong for numerous reasons, but the utmost common reasons would be human rights, wrongful execution, and cost effective. These reasons should be taken seriously considering that it is another person’s life aside for what they have done. Whereas it can affect someone’s financial situation since they have paid for it with their own money. The death penalty is a violation of the human rights law. Center for Constitutional Rights states that, “Under Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), life is a human right.” They need to understand that killing a person is a wrong. Nobody denies the heinous crime they have done, …show more content…
The amount of circumspect during the trials to find the murderer, there’s always a possibility they can be innocent. Granted, that people do provide a confession that is false. As well as the harassment from law enforcement while being interrogated. For example an article on the innocence project talked about a man named, Claude Jones, who was executed for the murder of a store owner in Texas. He was convicted as a result of a chemist from the state claimed during the trial that the hair could only belong to Claude Jones. When Jones was executed groups formed to obtain the hair from the crime scene. Once it was approved, they tested the hair and the results were negative, the hair did not belong to Jones, it belonged to the victim. The problem with this case was Claude Jones did not have the technology to prove his innocence. The chemist’s opinion during the trial was the only thing that would be accurate to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Fire Case Study

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of “Trial by Fire” presents how flawed expert testimony and prejudice influence a trial in a negative way. On December 23, 1991, Cameron Todd Willingham’s house burned while his three babies laid in their bedrooms sleeping, escaping with only minor injuries; he was arrested and charged with capital murder of his three daughters (Grann). The certified arson investigators stated that they found twenty indicators of arson after putting the fire out. They believed that Willingham was the one starting the fire. Thus, Willingham was offered a plea but refused and wanted to take his chances with a jury. He had always proclaimed his innocence; however, the jury made the decision to find him guilty and gave him the death penalty (Grann). Willingham was executed on the grounds that he committed arson. However, many aspects of the arson report have since been proved wrong. The central evidence relied upon at Willingham’s trial was the testimony of Fire Marshal Vasquez and Assistant Fire Chief Fogg, their findings of 20 indicators had already been subsequently discredited. The Arson Review Committee Report concludes that “each and every one of the indicators relied upon have since been scientifically proven to be invalid” (Ryan). It means that previous fire…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment (death penalty) violates the United States Constitution. According to the 8th Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual" punishments are inflicted. The death penalty is retribution, involves inhumane procedures, and it is an unfair way to solve problems. the death penslty is not a good way to serve justice.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    abolished or not. Many people think that the death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights, they also believe that it violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is also known to be a cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment to kill someone even though they have murdered or had help the killer commit the crime. Some people believe what is the point of the death penalty, they are already dead so how is it helping any for the victim.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is the killing of a convicted person who has committed a violent and heinous crime. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is determined through a court of law and is not enforced in all states of the United States of America. It is not used in all murder cases, only those who have been convicted of committing atrocious killings (Hood). The death penalty is solely utilized for the cases in which the convict has committed a crime that has made him or her potentially a threat to society. Some of the crimes committed that receive the death penalty in the state of Texas include: multiple murders, planned murder, repeated crimes, and/or rape and murder. The death penalty has been used since the beginning…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment or death penalty is usually imposed on persons who committed heinous crimes and are those that endanger the safety of the society. Some countries and societies implement capital punishment while others do not. There are various reasons for this policy of countries, including the social view on the death penalty and the prevailing religious view in the society among others.…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital Essay

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment is good for keeping Bad people off the streets it is send out a message if you want to do something stupid you will get punished for it and by getting your life taken away, this is the most horrific punishment of all.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment is wrong because it puts innocent lives at risk and it does not deter crimes from happening. The solution is to abolish the death penalty and sentence criminals to life in prison without possibility of parole. Many agree that the death penalty is not wrong because it keeps innocent people safe and the threat of death does deter crime from happening. The death penalty is a problem because innocent people can be put to death for being wrongly accused of committing a crime.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. The highest sentence that can be enforced by the American Judicial system is that of death. Capital punishment has been carried out on criminals for quite some time, but never without a strong opposition. Many people view capital punishment as a heinous act that is morally incorrect. The fact still remains that in our current society, the majority of Americans support capital punishment.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain states still allow the death penalty as an option for punishing criminals. This eye for an eye punishment has been a controversy for many years. Deciding whether or not it is morally right to take a person’s life because they took another’s life is the main issue still up for debate. The death penalty is a punishment that the court is unable to take back. In the event that the jury and judge were wrong in their decision, deciding to take falsely accused individual’s life by giving such an extreme punishment can cause a huge controversy across the nation. Therefore, the death penalty should not be an option for deciding how to accurately punish an individual.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a person is put on death row, mostly likely nobody exactly knows if the person actually did the crime, evidence shows many things but doesn’t accurately confirm if somebody did something. It isn’t right to kill someone and not know…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment is the punishment of a heinous crime like murder. It is being used now in some states and has also been used in the ancient times. Thirteen states right now don’t have the death penalty: Alaska, District of Colombia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. But all states should ban it because the American Civil Liberties Union believes the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. Capital punishment is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system…. Why kill if you’re trying to tell them that killing is wrong? Killing someone is wrong in all ways!!!…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays