Preview

Why Is Civil Disobedience Important To The Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
682 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Civil Disobedience Important To The Government
Throughout the history of the United States, there has been a continuous debate about which threat is the most severe for the American people: foreign invaders and terrorists, or a national government with too much power and without the best interests of its people in mind. It is apparent through the creation of the Bill of Rights, as well as the general purpose of limiting the powers of the national government within the Constitution, that the framers believed that an overly powerful national government was the greatest threat to the American people. In order for the people of a nation to debate an issue such as this, it is essential for them to support the exercise of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is more than just a positive …show more content…
If government is made up of people, and if a government believes that it is essential to have access to certain pieces of information in order to protect its people, than it inherently believes that having information about potential threats is critical for people to protect themselves. Therefore, to keep information from its people is to keep them from having access to a means for protecting themselves, which goes against the initial purpose of the argument. For a government to keep information from its people while also preventing them from exercising civil disobedience in order to protest the keeping of that information must mean that it looks to serve some separate interest, which breaks the agreement between the people that makes up government in the first place. To sum things briefly, the exercise of civil disobedience is not only a positive impact on a free society; it is the very ideology that a free society is founded upon. Without support for disobedience, a government breaks the agreement that it represents. By this reasoning, without the right to peacefully oppose a law while also accepting the consequences, a society cannot truly identify as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Seven Guidelines for Civil Disobedience, Howard Zinn presents civil disobedience as an act of deliberately violating a law for a societal purpose (Zinn 1). Therefore, civil disobedience is completely justified when society is threatened by a regime that practices absolute sovereignty. It is justified because absolute sovereignty only serves the interests of the state, not ours. Zinn perfectly uncovers the agenda of absolute sovereignty by stating: “We must never forget that we and the state are separate in our interest, and we must not be lured into forgetting this by the agents of the state. The state seeks power and wealth…[while] the individual seeks, health, peace, creative activity, and love” (Zinn 2). Consequently, absolute sovereignty…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now for arguments presented against civil disobedience: of seven, Cohen concludes that none ""succeeds in showing that civil disobedience can never be justified."" Finally, the penetrating conclusion that ""Civil disobedience as a means is extraordinary, but, after all, so are the problems society sometimes confronts.""…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That civil disobedience is an unnecessary disruption and any unfair law passed by legislative can be changed. Bills that become laws though take an average of 263.57 days if it even gets passed. And why would they change a law they liked in the first place? It’s noble and democratic to take the long way but if the issue is important to the benefit of citizens no should never be an answer. We should take control of the situation just as Benjamin Franklin said we could in the Declaration of Independence. “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. We are the ones in charge and thanks to this textual evidence and the first amendment we have a right to protest and create…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay, civil disobedience, argues that when a person is not in comfort with the government, then we have a right as humans to act against its injustice. Thoreau supports his argument by first stating that unjust laws exist and that we shall endeavor to amend them instead of being content to obey them. His purpose is to inform the reader about the way they are being mistreated by government and to persuade them to act against their injustices in a civil disobedient way inn order to see the government acting up more rapidly and systematically. Thoreau establishes a critical and righteous tone for those who are against…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher John Locke once wrote that, “No man ...has a power to hand over their preservation...to the absolute will and arbitrary dominion of someone else”. He meant that the inviolable rights of a people are greater than the demands of a government and his words ring true today. In the modern era people can fight “arbitrary dominion” through democratic election, vocal condemnation, and most controversially civil disobedience. The practice of deliberate defiance has netted much criticism for its seeming disregard for a country’s rule of law. Yet, a free society is one in which people have the power to exercise their rights, and in choosing not to follow unjust laws, they only strengthen a country's institutions.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the outspoken events of the Boston Tea Party to the courageous acts of the Civil Rights Movements, the United States has been built on the idea of a free society, where all men are created equal, and where equal representation is practiced throughout the states. But throughout history, the laws of the government have sometimes suppressed specific groups of American citizens, causing many to feel betrayed or unworthy in the eyes of our Founding Fathers. That’s why in 1776, the Founding Fathers stated in the Declaration of Independence that it’s the right of the people to abolish or alter any government that becomes destructive of deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. Founding Father, John Adams states that “Government…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau says, “If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him and drown myself.” This metaphors sums up most of what he is saying in On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. The person unjustly wresting the plank from the drowning man is the government, and the drowning man himself is the citizens of a government. This is to say that if the government wrongly takes from its citizens to save itself, then the government must first give what has been taken back to its citizens and then the government should fall to its demise. Thoreau’s main point is to say that the most optimal scenario is to not have a government at all because “the only times when government has been useful has been when it has stood aside,” but realistically this isn’t possible, so he suggests to have a better government put in place. One that has minimal power and doesn’t control its citizens. Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience relates to modern times because our government today needs to be put in check and has made many examples of governing people too much.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau and Paul Power’s Civil Disobedience as Functional Opposition both argue that if the government were not evil in its objectives and agenda then the idea and practice of civil disobedience would not have been needed nor created. According to Powers, “due the established evil of our government, there are both moral and ideological grounds for justifying civil disobedience,” (Powers 37). This is because civil disobedience is a reaction to unjust government. Although many argue against civil disobedience by saying unjust laws made by a democratic legislature can be changed by a democratic legislature and that the existence of lawful channels of change make civil disobedience unnecessary, Thoreau and Powers would argue that the constitution and said laws are the problem, not the solution. According to Thoreau, governments are often “abused and perverted” (Civil Disobedience 249) so that they no longer reflect the needs and opinions of the common people. The American government showcased the aforementioned abuse and perversion during Thoreau’s time in their partaking in the Mexican-American War. The main objective…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When government violates the natural or inalienable rights of its citizens, it is the citizens’ duty to abolish the government and create a new one.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Bureaucracy Wrong

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government,” Thomas Jefferson once said. The government is a precarious, but influential, part in the world today. Many believe that everything the government does should be implemented in order to keep structure in our daily lives. However, bureaucracy is not always right. The government can often prove it can not be credible, plausible, or dependable. For as long as democracy has been in place, people have disagreed with it. Yet, if it were not for these disputes, government would never be anything that it is today. It is appropriate to go against the government if there is a conscience-challenged problem that can be solved civilly.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term civil disobedience has been used all throughout history in events as capacious as revolts or as bitty as courtroom involvement. The ideas to which the term has developed throughout time originated from the different cultures possessing events that are linked to civil disobedience. There are references to the past Greek tragedies wherein for example, should the higher transcending laws and the regular laws of the state come into conflict with each other, the individual of the society would have the option to disobey the law of the said state. These ideas evolved and came into the people’s minds when several known characters from history, such as John Locke and St. Thomas Aquinas, expressed and taught their beliefs that mainly stated that the people should have the right to alter the government, should it fail to properly execute its fundamental duties. The person who first coined the term, emanated it, and put it into use was the acclaimed writer, Henry David Thoreau. His ideas on civil disobedience were first found in the speech he delivered in the Concord Lyceum in 1848. Later notable…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    These rules set limits on the manner in which participants may seek to influence community decision-making, are the foundation of a morally just government. By deliberately breaking its rules, the civil disobedient supplies a form of pressure unlawful in court, thereby negating the principle of the majority rule. In doing so, a state of war is created between the civil disobedient and his community, forcing the community to respond similarly, undermining and rendering inapplicable the democratic process.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When governments continuously disenfranchise their population by lack of economic opportunity or education, they have a right to revolt against their governments. Both violent and nonviolent protests develop under the same conditions and fight for the same causes, therefore, both forms of civil disobedience are justifiable. Historically, marginalized groups, especially black communities in the United States, have experienced terror by the hands of police for centuries. After centuries of harassment, black communities have taken a stance against the injustices committed by those who are sworn in to protect them. Civil disobedience, whether violent or non-violent, is universally a justifiable method to achieve social change.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays