Preview

Why Is Domestic Surveillance Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Domestic Surveillance Important
Domestic Surveillance

When we talk about domestic surveillance, it often follows that we speak of the importance of privacy, of being free from observation or disturbance, from public attention. In the United States, privacy is fundamental right, listed in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution which states:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The government started spying on the citizens of the united states because of terrorist attacks specifically the twin towers. The topic of domestic surveillance has been argued for a long time by the people of the United States and the law. In 2015 part the NSA program was ruled illegal but was not changed because of the Patriot Act.
…show more content…
If we are protected by this amendment, why does the NSA track, monitor and spy on the citizens of the United States? Why are we being monitored when a federal court rules the NSA illegal? One might ask “Is this really such an outrage?” Only those with something to hide should be worried about the NSA monitoring United States citizens. Edward Snowden, the American credited for bringing the NSA’s monitoring to the public, and allowing the United States citizens to know they were being watched closely nationwide, once

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Policy Brief of NSA Reform

    • 3654 Words
    • 12 Pages

    I. Introduction: Since the acknowledgment of abused power by the NSA by former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden, long debate about the constitutionality of the collection of private records of American citizens has ensued in the senate. As a result of this issue that has and can continue to transgress on the civil liberty of privacy by all persons and entities, The USA Freedom act has been created which seeks to limit and to regulate the power of US surveillance agencies to collect private information from third parties. The USA Freedom directly addresses issues that are included in the USA Patriot Act, an act that was created to combat and to create protection against the threat of terrorism, which was a fear that heightened in response to the 2001 September 11 attacks (Savage). While this bill proved necessary at the time, in the act, are provisions that overstep constitutional boundaries that go beyond the intention and framework of the original plan.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by Congress as a response to the terrorist attack of September 11. On October 26, 2001 The USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law No. 107-56) was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The USA PATRIOT Act "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” this law enabled law enforcement personnel new abilities to search, seize, detain, or eavesdrop in their pursuit of possible terrorists as it states in our text. For the most part public response for The Patriot Act has been very close to even a Feb 2011 survey from the Pew Research center states “42% say the Patriot Act is a necessary tool that helps the government find terrorists, while somewhat fewer (34%) say the Patriot Act goes too far and poses a threat to civil liberties.” As compared to their Jan 2006 survey that said, “The public divided evenly over the Patriot Act, with 39% saying it is a necessary tool and 38% saying it goes too far.” When one thinks of the Pros of the Patriot Act he has to include the use of surveillance.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot act essay 4

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “After the act was passed, the executive argued that these broader powers would be used to put terrorist behind bars. In fact, several of the acts provisions can be used to gain information about Americans in the context of investigations with no demonstrated link to terrorism.” (Video) Many Americans feel as though the Patriot Act encroaches our 1st and 4th amendments which are the right to free speech and expression, as well as protecting the citizens of unwarranted search and seizures. From the government’s warrantless wiretapping, obtaining personal info from NSL’s or National Security Letters, emails, and phone records or unconstitutional surveillance of the citizens of the USA, free thinking, speech, and typical American lifestyle cannot survive in a nation full of fear and distrust created by our government and their Patriot Act.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Scans

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One September 11, 2001 Islamic Terrorists hijacked several flights and struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The US was shaken by 9/11. In response to the attacks the US passed laws to protect its people. The Patriot Act was one of the laws or acts that was passed in response to the 9/11 attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act were to strengthen domestic security and increase the powers of law-enforcement agencies to stop terrorism. In addition, the US Department of Homeland security created the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) to protect the nation’s Airways. Finally we have organizations such as the NSA that collect domestic and foreign information in order to protect the US. However, we end up sacrificing our privacy without…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, Americans have always expected a certain level of privacy. This right was granted to them by both the First and Fourth Amendments of the US Constitution. In 2001, then President Georg W. Bush signed into law the US Patriot Act.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    effects of Patriot Act

    • 1268 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked New York City’s World Trade Center towers. This was the first time since the Revolutionary War that America was attacked on its own soil. The attacks were unprecedented, and the government never saw it coming. For millions of Americans an unwanted new world order was coming in the days ahead, where even the most secure places in the country would be placed under tighter security and be in a lockdown type of situation. Because of the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the Patriot Act in 2001. Citizen privacy was abridged. The government had increased its ability to intrude on peoples’ private lives. Security policies of the United States were, supposedly, strengthened by being able to wiretap and use various other surveillance techniques without warning or acknowledgement, thereby infringing on individuals’ daily lives and lessening their personal freedom. President George W. Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act by all means is one of the most debated acts in United States history. That bill was intended to radically increase government powers of investigation and prosecution. From 2001 until now, the debate about the loss of personal liberty and constitutionality continues.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Earlier this month, The New York Times reported that since shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001 the National Security Agency, whose mission is to monitor the communications of foreigners outside our borders, has been focusing its futuristic spy technology on Americans." The spying that should shock everyone all over the US. Now people cannot even talk on the phone or talk online without some government official spying all over the place. The first amendment is only a tool; if no people use it then the government does not have to follow it. The government wants to protect people by listening to everyone trying to catch terrorists, but it should not be at the cost of freedom. "The electronic eavesdropping was conducted under orders from the president…" The president is a major source to this dilemma. He is taking away the rights of people who are not there to stop him. "The president himself even summoned Times officials to the White House to persuade them not to go ahead with the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument Against NSA

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the government’s initial intrusion upon our privacy, our fourth amendment rights were violated. Because U.S. citizens’ information was unlawfully stolen, the NSA disregarded our fourth Amendment rights, which states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”(AMENDMENT IV). Because normal U.S. citizens’ information was stolen without reason or consent, the NSA disregarded our fourth Amendment rights to…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic surveillance Have you ever felt like someone was watching you? The reality of the world we live in today is that people are watching us. There is a question standing: is the fact that the government is watching us constitutional or not? Is our privacy being infringed upon through the persistent prying fingers of those with higher authority? Many people have different views on this topic and there are many contributing factors to this issue.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surveillance in America is nothing new. It dates back to around 1945 with the ending of World War II after the Soviet Union and the United States became rivals as the world powers. From bugs on tree trunks to cameras in shoes to airplane drones, surveillance tools have really evolved over the years. The United States has been spending huge amounts of money to create better spying technology especially after terrorism increased over the last 20 years. The 9/11 terrorists attacks has greatly contributed to the increase of surveillance in America. A journalist states in his article, “‘you were fighting a never-ending war that gave you a…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the events of September 11, 2001 the US Congress had little resistance and passed legislation known as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act). This act along with many other regulations allowed the federal government to become more involved in personal affairs for the security of the nation. The privacy of yesterday doesn’t exist in order for the protection of the nation from further terrorist attacks. Terrorism is a threat that is globally a threat to the infrastructures of government and used as a way to inflict fear and panic into a clam structured environment. The Patriot Act not only is for the protection of and surveillance to investigate terrorist, but also Americans that can possibly do harm to our nation. The lack of balance that allows racially motivated surveillance is just one example of how civil liberties are violated. Terrorism is a serious matter that should not be handled lightly, but the act has gone over the top in trying to stop terrorism. The Patriot Act is a very positive act when used properly, but the manipulation of it by our government allows its abuse. With its almost unanimous decision by the Senate and same in the House the act went unopposed. Americans believe that a little violation of privacy is necessary for vigilance to protect the nation.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays