Why Is Ethical Egoism Wrong

The term Ethical Egoism is a concept that if a person only “stays in their lane” is when they will achieve the goal of being happy. This means you cannot get involved with other people's issues because that will either slow down or halt the progress of reaching your final destination (being happy). This is in my view is a very productive method to help solve moral disputes in the world. This concept can solve a lot of moral disputes because when a person gets involved in an issue that does not concern them and offends the person that is for what they are against the issue flares up and becomes more problematic than it should be. For example, if a man starts an argument with a woman about why abortion is wrong the argument can either not exist because both sides agree or the woman can be for abortion and will argue that it isn’t anybody's business what a woman does with the fetus inside her. If one party or side approached the argument with a Dogmatist attitude they will think
This occurred because people who are using this idea lose focus on other moral boundaries and crossing them. People started to become a little too selfish to the point where they will do everything that will satisfy their needs without regard to people around. Like in the Kant essay where I spoke about means and ends, the idea that everyone should be treated as an end instead of mean has basically become non-existent. Now people are starting to use others to improve or gain something and not caring how that will affect the person they are using as a mean. In my view, Ethical Egoism has become a tool that has turned into a weapon. For example, a screwdriver was made to be used a tool the drives down screws, but now people are starting to use it as an object that can puncture the skin (a stabbing