Frankenstein creating the monster starts off bad and it only goes even further downhill from there. What the monster does throughout the story is very unethical and not very moral, but its actions can be explained by learning about what Victor did to create the mess. When he created the monster and then left it, he put everyone who was close to him in danger and never owned up to the fact that it was his fault. He let innocent people die because of this and when he could have explained that he created the monster, he decided to stay silent. The bad ethics are even further displayed through secondary characters who judge the monster based on social norms and its looks. In a book of unethical and unmoral events, Shelley decided to place in an ethical and moral character: Robert Walton. He is the epitome of a great man based on his actions. This book was filled with unethical decisions that could have been prevented if the monster was never…
In the novel of Frankenstein, the monster demonstrates a very “mad” character. When it comes to justice or injustice to the monster, he leans towards justice. Due to the reason of his loneliness, he retaliates. The monster has a need for vengeance due to the reaction he gets from people, additionally, he was successful when victor died, and the significance for this as a whole was to be loved.…
When the Monster was created by Victor Frankenstein, it was an innocent being, a blank slate to be tainted. The first jab at the Monster was the abandonment of him by its father-figure and creator, Victor Frankenstein. Then, everyone he came across rejected him. As he learned to read and understand language, he started reading books. This, along with his new-found ability to convey thoughts, allowed him to process the information better, and formulate opinions and thoughts. When the Monster states, "...I vowed eternal hatred and vengeance against all mankind"(143), you can see that that was the moment in which hate entered his life, and his innocence disappeared. He also blames and hates Victor Frankenstein, who the Monster thinks of…
“A live body and a dead body contain the same number of particles. Structurally, there's no discernible difference. Life and death are unquantifiable abstracts.”…
Secondly, Frankenstein is an antihero because he is neither on righteousness’ side nor on wickedness’ side, and only acts for his own benefit. For instance, Frankenstein works for himself when he does not help prove that Justine is not William Frankenstein’s murderer. He refuses to reveal William’s murderer: I was firmly convinced in my own mind that Justine…was guiltless of this murder…Did any one indeed exist, who would believe in the existence of the living monument of presumption and rash ignorance which I had let loose upon the world?” (81). Frankenstein’s inactivity depends on his interest in self-preservation because he does not assist unless he benefits, and has no remorse for individuals who consequentially suffer. In this case, if…
Thomas Hobbes believes men are naturally evil and in this sense the monster was evil because he was made that way. This is illustrated in Hobbes quote, “there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no culture of the earth; navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is the worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (37). Despite the monsters misfortunes, such as killing all of Frankenstein’s loved ones, he…
Frankenstein's Monster is a tangible representation of evil being created. Humans are solely responsible for the evidence of evil, primarily based off how they treat each other. Originally, the Monster embodies a childlike naivety which causes him to be completely unaware of his status as "an abhorred monster" (Shelley 92). Completely isolated from society, the Monster still develops a sense of self awareness which leads to the revelation of his loneliness. Desperate to cure his emotional pain, the Monster observes a family from afar and envies their happiness and connectedness. Eventually, he "hoped to meet the beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding" (Shelley 196), and receive companionship and love from his ideal future friends. At this point, the Monster is clearly not evil, rather just an innocent being seeking the same validation that most humans strive to find.…
The hatred that the creature received from his creator, Victor Frankenstein is what initially led to his downward spiral to his unjust actions. Frankenstein originally created the creature because he thought that it was for the betterment of humankind. His state of mind when he created the creature was excited and he was motivated to create new life. Prior to the initial creation he says, "A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me” (Shelley, Chapter 4). This quote shows insight into Victor’s motivation and his overpowering ego as well as exhibiting his ambitious side and his yearning to be a God-like figure. Frankenstein wishes to re-create life to satisfy his ego, but he never thought over the outcome. After it was created, the creature had a strong desire to be loved and required a companion. When he realized that he could not give the creature what he needs, Frankenstein slowly started hating his creation. The sight of it disgusted him, which is what gives the monster the idea that he is unloved. He states, “How can I describe my emotions at…
The monster of Frankenstein was denied the opportunity to be good. Frankenstein’s monster was resentful towards everyone because of his father, Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein created the monster and ran away immediately after he came to life. In the novel written by Mary Shelley, Frankenstein says, “I took refuge in the court-yard belonging to the house which I inhabited; where I remained during the rest of the night…catching and fearing each sound as if it were to announce the approach of the demoniacal corpse to which I had so miserably given life” (614). When he ran away, it made the monster spite him. The monster became angry that his father, the man that created him, didn’t want him anymore and was afraid of him. The monster stalks the De Lacy family, eager to learn from them. One day he decides to go inside and talk to the old, blind De Lacy man, the other family members come…
As I read the book,” Frankenstein” by Mary Shelly, I felt like the monsters violence was unjustified. His violent out burst were for revenge. When the monster didn’t get a female companion it made him angry and sad. He cant get any one remotely like him. No one to know what he feels on the day to day basis. But that doesn’t give him the right to kill or hurt people. He killed William, Elizabeth, and Henry; just to get back at Victor. That’s a perfect example on how unjustified the monsters actions were. He shouldn’t have felt justified to take someone’s life, bit since he felt alone he wanted everyone around him to feel what he felt every second of his life. The monster just wanted to feel like a normal being in a world full of differences.…
Frankenstein has plenty of revenge in the story. There may have been a lot of revenge in the story but, you can not forget that there is also kindness in Frankenstein. The characters have good and bad in them which can leave to revenge. The story is great because you can see how people change throughout time. For an example the creature was nice at first because he was happy to be alive. Then when Frankenstein leaves him his anger increases which leads to revenge.…
And because he was not loved and nurtured he formed this deep feeling of hatred for the man who created him, Victor Frankenstein. The monster blamed his misery on Frankenstein, so he begins to kill the people closest to him. However, was this a reason to blame everything on Frankenstein and kill innocent human beings? The monster was not right to blame Frankenstein.…
Throughout the novel Frankenstein, many people view the creation as the monster, which on the surface is what we are seeing by reading this text. However, as pointed out by writer Josh Traynelis, by reading into the text and digging out the small details provided in the reading, people begin to believe that maybe the creator is in fact the one that deserves to be called the monster. As pointed out in “Who’s the Real Monster?” by Traynelis, “Instead it was the extreme misconceptions of humans, resulting in extreme isolation of the creature, that caused him to become a monster,” where the isolation of the creature mainly draws back to the rejection of the creator and mankind (Traynelis, 1). The creator seemed to be disappointed with his creation,…
As humans, we have certain distinct traits that allow us to differentiate amongst others. While all humans have different attributes, they all share a common trait, and in this case, it is considered to be ‘revenge’. Revenge is “the action of hurting or harming someone in return for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands.” Throughout the course of the novel, Shelley showed us that revenge comes from one’s core; it is a trait found mostly within people who have faced some sort of betrayal from a loved one, in this case, a ‘parent’ or its ‘child’. Both parties, Frankenstein and the creature, have betrayed one another severely; and both persons were obsessed with the concept of avenging the other.…
Second of all, overdoses because of prescription drugs can affect anyone, and it causes more death than vehicle crashes. People have been more focused on making cars safer so you can basically text and drive at the same time, rather than making drugs more safe. In the article The Cost of the Opioid Crisis it states that the number of people dying because of prescription opioid is larger than those who die in motor vehicle accidents. People are still trying to make cars safer even though the opioid epidemic is now exceeding the amount of deaths. “ In 2013, though, opioids killed 16,235 people; that's approximately half as many as died in traffic accidents that year, and about 2,000 more than were murdered” (Pain medications are killing a shocking…