Preview

Why Is Gavrilo Princip As A Second Bomb

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Gavrilo Princip As A Second Bomb
The coverage in St. Petersburg´s newspapers about the murderer, Gavrilo Princip, highlights his identity, his partners and his motives for the crime. “Exchange Statements” compared the interrogations of the member that threw the first bomb, Chabrinovich, who didn´t hide his satisfaction for the death of the Archduke but regretted the death of Sophie, and Princip, who was “utterly defeated and depressed”. The newspapers described Princip as a “schoolboy”, “a young Serbian patriot”, “a mad killer”, and an “eighteen-year-old youth”. Princip´s actions were, in a way, excused by the following: "Gavrilo Princip saw the oppressed position of the Serbs in Austria-Hungary, and, under the influence of blindness, imagined that it was possible to change …show more content…
Franz accepted this conditions, but Franz Joseph was afraid that after he died and his nephew took his place, he wouldn't keep his promise and make his sons the heirs to the throne. The other thing that made Franz Joseph say that quote was the fact that Franz Ferdinand was known to be a supporter of the Slavs, even considering to make a Triarchy with the South Slavs. Unluckily for the Serbians, almost the only thing that made Austria not to attack was Franz holding them back. After the assassination, the Austrians started to riot against the Serbians since they feared further Serbian plots against Austria, meanwhile, the government analyzed what would they do with the Serbians after this. In a start, they acknowledged that starting war with Serbia could cause war with Russia, but as the time passed by the support of the Kaiser Wilhelm II made Austria more secure about making war with Serbia, this by sending them an ultimatum that was impossible to accept, made intentionally by Austria in that way so they could have an excuse to attack Serbia. This action ultimately led to the start of the World War I, although also the sociopolitical conditions of Europe, like the fight of Germany and Great Britain over the naval forces, or Russia who wanted to get influence over the Serbs, besides others. (Gilbert, 1994, p.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Gr. 10 History Review

    • 9341 Words
    • 38 Pages

    - Serbian Gavrilo Princip shot Austro-Hungarian Duke Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, on the road back from City Hall; goal was to crush Austria-Hungary’s nationalism…

    • 9341 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism, the love and support of one's country, has always existed. At this time, however, it was so prominent, it helped cause the first world war. Since so much pride was devoted to countries, it made the possibilities of peace between past rivals less probable. People felt great loyalty and were willing to do anything for their country. In history, many wars have been over territorial disputes. A country feels nationalistic, and people's pride leads to people wanting to expand with more land. A country can feel so strongly about this, that they will fight for it. The spark of the world was the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife. They were shot by a Serbian nationalist because of the crisis in the Balkans. The Balkan Peninsula was a mountainous area below Austira-Hungary and consisted of many different ethnic groups. Each group was very nationalistic and wanted to extend its borders, especially Serbia. Austria-Hungary took over two Balkan Slavic areas. Document 6 describes the tension in this region at the time. Serbia did not want Austria-Hungary to have Bosnia and Herzegovina. The archduke was shot because the Serbians…

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On June 14, 1914, Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip, shot and killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austria-Hungarian throne, during his visit to Sarajevo, Bosnia. The assassination, which was in protest of Austria-Hungary 's control of the region, was the catalyst for a bloody and destructive global conflict that would cost millions of lives and would leave entire countries in ruins.…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Causes Of World War 1

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While many factors led to the war, nationalism contributed the most, due to the desire of the Serbs to create their own Slavic nation and the need of each European country to be more superior than the others. “Additionally, the Serbians could or would do little to stop the activities of the anti-Austrian secret society, the Black Hand. To the Austrians, the rise of Pan-Slavic nationalism, and particularly Serbian aggression, was a direct threat to the future of the Austrian Empire.” (Doc J) Archduke Franz Ferdinand, a prominent figure in Austria-Hungary, was assassinated by the Black Hand, a Serbian organization. The purpose of the Black Hand was to unite the Serbs within Austria-Hungary, and it responded to the imminent threat, which could break up its empire, by declaring an…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the world’s most devastating and history-changing wars was caused by the assassination of Austria-Hungary’s Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was next in line for the throne to govern over the Austria-Hungary empire in the beginning of the 20th century, and he was rising at a very dangerous and tense time. In the early 1900s, Austria-Hungary was in a stressful conflict with the country of Serbia. The Serbians wanted the land of Bosnia, in which the Austria-Hungarian empire had annexed into their country, and Serbia wanted to unite all of the Serb ethnic groups to form a country known as “Greater Serbia,” (Bodden 19). They wanted to send a message to Austria-Hungary, and they wanted to show that they meant business. So, the Serbian government…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Austria-Hungary’s ultimatum to Serbia showed self-interest, this is because Austria-Hungary made it extreme so it was a win-win scenario for themselves. Because, if Serbia rejected as they did, it gave Austria-Hungary an excuse to invade and take out one of the major problems stopping them from conquering all the Balkan states. But, if Serbia accepted, Austria got to run an investigation into Serbia’s link into the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, this would of most likely caused major problems for Serbia. Therefore, Austria-Hungary making the ultimatum so extreme, where it was a win-win scenario for them showed that Austria-Hungary created the ultimatum so extreme for self-interest. This shows that…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    After an immense amount of tension caused by nationalism and industrialism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian group called the Black Hand, war broke out between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, eventually spreading to include many major powers of the time. During the summer of 1914, after refusal from Serbia to hunt down the group responsible for killing the archduke and failure to meet the conditions of the ultimatum given, Austria-Hungary prepared for an invasion of Serbia. Knowing that Russia was an ally of Serbia leaders fears that declaring war could potentially bring Russia’s allies, France and Great Britain into the battle. As a result, Austria-Hungary waited until support was established from Germany to declare war on July 28. The powers didn’t know at…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there is one person to blame for World War I, its Archduke Franz Ferdinand, only he didn’t do anything bad, he was just assassinated, which sparked Austria’s tensions and therefore started the war. The buildup would’ve been much slower, perhaps even the war avoided, no costs for Germany, and no Second World War, which might’ve meant no Holocaust. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the leader of Austria before getting shot by teenager Gavrilo Princip. The assassination of Archduke was unjust because he was a great leader, fixed many of Austria’s current problems, and didn’t partake in the social and political problems surrounding the ongoing war buildup. Unfortunately Austria decided to use this as an excuse, they used him for a reason to go to war with Serbia, despite them not having much to do with Austria’s problems.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The assassination of the Archduke played an important role in starting the war. In 1914, the groups of people under Austria-Hungary control wanted to be free. Gavrilo Princip wanted Bosnia, a country under Austria-Hungary rule, to join Serbia. Princip shot and killed the Archduke to free Bosnia. As a result of the assassination, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia since a…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The assassination of the Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand the heir to the Austro-Hungarian empire at Sarajevo was the event that led to the start of the First World War. The Austro-Hungarian government believed that the assassin that killed Ferdinand and his wife were a product of the Serbian government, And as a result they declared war on Serbia. Because of the alliance system this caused Russia to mobilise their troops.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro to Ww1

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The act which is considered to have triggered the succession of events which led to war was the 28 June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb citizen of Austria-Hungary and member of the Young Bosnia. The retaliation by Austria-Hungary against the Kingdom of Serbia activated a series of alliances that set off a chain reaction of war declarations. Within a month, much of Europe was in a state of open warfare.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unity In 1800s

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History.com stated, “The assassination of Franz Ferdinand set off a rapidly escalating chain of events” (“World War I"), which means there would start a huge riot that would turn into a war. They also stated, “Many countries around the world blamed the Serbian government for the attack and hope to use the incident as justification for settling the question of Serbian nationalism once and for all.” (“World War I”). During the war, America continued to trade with Britain, France, and Germany; however, they slowly stopped trading with Germany because of bribes from Britain and France while claiming to be neutral. This would divide Germany and America.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Nations Go to War

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Because they all believed that they were all acting as if they should, in the right manner, they had no problem with their actions. They had no problem assassinating the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. Austria had no problem punishing Serbia for this assassination.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a terrorist or freedom fighter truly depends on which side you are. For example the Austro-Hungarians most likely thought Gavrilo Princip was a terrorist because he disturbed their rein of power, however to the Serbians, Gavrilo was most likely seen as a freedom fighter. Furthermore the best way to decide is to be an un-biased third party. First off looking at the definitions and looking at widely regarded terrorist attack such as 911, we look at why Gavrilo attacked. In 911 terrorists attack another countries citizen in their own country, the key part is that it was in another person’s country. Looking at Gavrilo he attacked the political party that over took his country. He simply wanted his own country back, he was filled with sovereignty. Furthermore it’s who (person) he attacked and the power of that person. As we already know Franz Ferdinand was the next to rule the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Gavrilo and the rest of the Black Hand did not attack any citizens or powerful people to make a point. They attacked to stop the tyranny over their country; they shed the least amount of blood. It wasn’t to tell of the Austro-Hungarians, and say they can kill everyone. It was to say this is our country, we demand sovereignty. They wanted to stop their rule right then and there. To further understand why this was done, we look at for whom it was for, and why Gavrilo joined the Black Hand. Gavrilo was dying of tuberculoses, he wasn’t doing it solely for himself, he looked at how oppressed his people were and wanted to do something meaningful with the remander of his life. In the video we watched it said Gavrilo wanted to be remembered. He knew he was dying but he failed to act the first time because he was scared, he still could have shot even with the commotion that happened earlier. However he did fail to act, now this doesn’t sound like a terrorist or villain. Yes further on he shot Franz because he knew this was what needed to be done. Finally Gavrilo attacked…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism on Wwi

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late 19th century, some European countries that had not built empires, such as Germany and the Slavic states. They started to push to expand their territory and influence. This led to tension with those nations such as Britain, France and Russia who had already been building empires for several hundred years. It is a battle of the old versus the new. Obviously, countries like Russia and Britain were wealthier and strongly dominant over the countries trying to come up. But countries like Germany; make their way up the ladder and demand respect. Emperor William II wanted to strengthen ties with Britain because they it has the wealthiest and most successful, thriving country at the time. Unfortunately for Germany’s Emperor William the II, his words had the opposite effect on Britain, which made an enemy for Germany that could destroy them at anytime. As alliances were built and tension spread in the colonies across the globe, it became apparent to many that there was going to have to be a Great War to resolve it all. WWI was not a surprise to people, but they were in for a surprise on how bloody this war actually was. The assassination of Archduke…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays