Const. amend. VI). In which hearsay is used in court as truthful testimony the accused is denied their right to meet their accuser which would be the individual who supposedly witnessed what the accused said not the individual who was told what the accused said to that individual. The Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment guarantees this right to the accused. The Confrontation Clause basis for excluding any post-suggestive statements is that because post-suggestion reports are indistinguishable from accurate reports, and subsequent questioning cannot distinguish the truth between the two, in which cross-examination is rendered ineffective by the use of suggestion (Rosenthal, 2002). Suggestive interviews can subsequently alter the perception of an individual and their recollection of the
Const. amend. VI). In which hearsay is used in court as truthful testimony the accused is denied their right to meet their accuser which would be the individual who supposedly witnessed what the accused said not the individual who was told what the accused said to that individual. The Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment guarantees this right to the accused. The Confrontation Clause basis for excluding any post-suggestive statements is that because post-suggestion reports are indistinguishable from accurate reports, and subsequent questioning cannot distinguish the truth between the two, in which cross-examination is rendered ineffective by the use of suggestion (Rosenthal, 2002). Suggestive interviews can subsequently alter the perception of an individual and their recollection of the