Why Is Kimball Wrong

When considering Kimball as a practitioner of Aristotle’s theory we then lay out all of the options. We are careful to choose the “mean” but also choose what has right amount of confidence and fear. If a human being exceeds fear or fearlessness then that is a clear sign that he or she shouldn’t be partaking in that action. The rate of either feeling shouldn’t be in surplus or discrepancy. There should be a virtual value considered by one self, consciously configuring the right deed. We must take into consideration Dr. Kimble options and figure out which is best suited for the scenario. All options should be weighed against each other determining whether or not the actions of Nichols are acceptable or just naturally bad. While listing his options there should be a focus on potential consequences or implications. The best option will be picked as the
If Kimble allowed the study to continue and medication being prescribed it could be essentially considered as murder of all of the uninformed patients. In the passage “Happiness and Virtue” it is written, “But not every action nor every passion admits of a mean; for some have names that already imply badness, e.g. spite, shamelessness….. theft, murder; for all of these and suchlike things imply by their names that they are themselves bad, and not the excesses or deficiencies of them. It is not possible, then, ever to be right with regard to them; one must always be wrong” (Russo, 6). Kimble should if being a practitioner of Aristotle, study all of his options and choose the best option between his two vices, being honest and withholding the truth. Then weigh out the appropriate amount of both. Not all actions can hold a golden mean. To continue this study and murder those who are unaware of the side effects that are possible would imply badness. It is not right and is wrong if Kimble is a practitioner of