Preview

Why Is Miranda Rights Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Miranda Rights Important
James Madison is known as the Father of the Constitution, a body of fundamental laws that set out the process of government. The Constitution is made up of multiple articles and amendments. Multiple amendments allow anyone to vote, the 6th amendment gives everyone Miranda rights, and the 3rd amendment gives the right to bear arms. The Constitution and the Amendments still guarantee freedom for the people in the U.S. Voting use to be restricted to certain people, based on race, age, and gender. Very few people actually had the freedom to vote, but the 15th, 19th, and the 26th amendment changed all of that. Now, anyone, as long as you’re a U.S citizen, can vote; this includes women, blacks, and anyone 18 or over. When 18 year olds were being drafted, they didn’t feel like it was fair that they had to be ruled by a president that they didn’t even get to vote for. The right to vote isn’t restricted to any U.S citizen, and gives everyone a voice for who gets to run the country. …show more content…
The Miranda rights include a speedy trial, the right to face your accuser and witnesses, and the right to a lawyer. So everyone has the freedom to know their Miranda rights, which is beneficial when you’re facing legal trouble. There are some exceptions to the Miranda rights. For example, if the accuser is a child, they may be allowed to not attend a trial. It can be very psychological damaging for a child to have to go up against a person who had hurt them in some way. That does sometimes take away the right to face an accuser for a ‘criminal’, but they should have thought about that before deciding to hurt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Reynold Lancaster discussed how the Miranda warning is used by police officers and other law enforcements when they arrest a person of interest. The Miranda warning allows the officers…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Miranda vs Arizona case Miranda established that the police are required to inform arrested persons that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to an attorney. The case involved a claim by the plaintiff that the state of Arizona, by obtaining a confession from him without having informed him of his right to have a lawyer present, had violated his rights under the Fifth Amendment regarding self incrimination. Miranda was arrested for kidnap and rape and was interrogated for a long period of time. This interrogation resulted in a signed confession. At court Miranda lawyer argued that the confession was obtained from a person who does not understand their rights. The court agreed that a person should be informed of their rights and understand them before the police…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison played a pivotal role in the drafting of the Articles of the Constitution. Madison’s model of government focuses on “dispersing power among several branches and establishing constitutional safeguards to prevent any single person or group of people from controlling the government.” Madison worked closely with other delegates to shape the final document; for this reason, he is sometimes called the “Father of the Constitution.” (1) (Spark Notes Editors)…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In later years, when he was referred to as the "Father of the Constitution," Madison protested that the document was not "the off-spring of a single brain," but "the work of many heads and many hands. "In Congress, he helped frame the Bill of Rights and enact the first revenue legislation. Out of his leadership in opposition to Hamilton's financial proposals.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    james madison paper

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Madison was very into the United States government. He cared about it’s well being and also about it’s citizens. He helped to draft the Bill of Rights, to protect individual citizens from government coercion. While serving in the House of Representatives, Madison helped to author the Bill of Rights. Madison's version included 19 different items, and in 1791 the states approved 10 of them. These became the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. These amendments protected individual liberties, such as the right to speak freely.…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of their newfound citizenship, Male African Americans gained the right to vote in elections. Another amendment that was added to the constitution was the 19th amendment. This amendment states “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex” (U.S. Congress 1920). Known as a result of the women's suffrage movement, this amendment allows women to vote in elections. These two amendments showcase the Constitution as a living document and its ability to adapt to the evolving ideas of American society.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to vote was given to all citizens from the fifteenth amendment. Though the amendment states that all races can vote, that wasn’t necessarily the case. Southern and some Northern found a way to legally and constitutional stop blacks from voting. They had issued different types of clauses or test, like the grandfather clause or the literacy test. The grandfather clause claimed that if your grandfather had voted, then that person was allowed to vote.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two hours later, investigators emerged from the room with a written confession signed by Miranda. The confession included a typed disclaimer, also signed by Miranda, stating that he had “full knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any statement I make may be used against me,” and that he knowingly waived these rights. Despite the statement typed on the top of the sheet, he was never told of and aware of his constitutional rights. Two weeks later at the preliminary hearing once again Miranda’s rights were denied. At trial, no evidence was presented that Miranda had ever been told that he did not have to talk to police or that he had the right to a lawyer.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda rights in some cases do ensure justice and at times they don’t. They can unsure justice if they were read to the suspect but if not all the evidence they have collected could go out the window. But if they do read your rights they can continue with their investigation and them anything they find can be used against you.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal law by nature is interesting to most people. However, there are many citizens that misinterpret what their rights are in a court of law. For instance, the Fifth amendment is a person’s right to not self-incriminate. Defendants typically do not address the court directly. They do so through they attorney. Attorneys are “responsible for advising their clients of their right to testify, whether or not it is wise to do so, as ell as the strategic implications of that decision” (Stock, 2015, p. 712). Just because a defendant does not testify on their own behalf, should not presume guilt. The sixth amendment stipulates that a defendant has the right to an attorney and to a jury trial. This is the premise where miranda rights come into play.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Decision Case

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda decision emerges from a case back in 1966 which deals with the rights of the accused, mainly with the Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate one’s self(Leo,1996).In this case Ernest Miranda,, a Mexican-American, was facing the state of Arizona for raping and kidnapping an eighteen year old woman.The case led to the Miranda warning which requires the officer to notify a suspect of his rights,i.e. you have the right to remain silent,and the right to speak to an attorney(Leo,1996). That the questions answered by Miranda during his interrogation must have been answered with the defendant’s knowledge of his rights.This made a big impact in the police force, that a testimony is only legitimate if the proper steps are carried out(Leo,1996).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day thousands of people get arrested. When the police officer is arresting you they read you your rights, known as your Miranda rights or Miranda warning. They are called “Miranda” rights because of a man named Ernesto Miranda. He committed a crime and was arrested. When the officers arrested him they did not advise him that he had the right to remain silent leading him to incriminate himself. The case was a lost cause. Ernesto Miranda was guilty but since the officers made a mistake it was a mistrial and he could not be charged. Does the Miranda v. Arizona case ensure justice and preserve peace?…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays