Preview

Why Is Nora Leave A Doll's House Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1010 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Nora Leave A Doll's House Wrong
Have you ever been put in a situation where no matter what you choose, you’ll end up sacrificing something? In A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen,that is exactly the type of situation the main character, Nora was put in. She was a normal housewife living out the ideal of the 19th-century wife and a mother of three who wanted to be independent. She felt as if her husband wouldn’t let her have and freedom nor room to grow and be the woman she wanted to be. When she finally starts to realize the feeling that she had towards her husband controlling her, she decides to leave her life as a married woman and mother of three behind and set out to live for herself and become an independent woman. Nora shows that going against what society expects of you …show more content…
A little after this she goes on to says, “ I am afraid, Torvald, I do not know exactly what religion is.” This relates to my thought of her exposing herself to things she knows nothing about because in the real world there are so many different religions and beliefs that people live up to that help them make it through and she doesn’t know anything about it. She is about to enter the world with not a bit of knowledge of knowing what is what and how to go about living her life. Nora also says, “ There is another task I must undertake first. I must try and educate myself.” This is wrong because she has not past education, she hasn’t been out to learn anything. She feels as if she is ready and the thought of this sounds good but she hasn’t lived alone a day in her life , knows nothing about the real world , and decides to up and leave her home with no plan at all. From this I think the author wants us to learn that before we go making decisions about things we barely know about we should have a plan just in case …show more content…
They may think she was sensible in making her decision at the time that she did, and ready for the new life she is about to take on.They too may feel that although she went against society’s expectations by leaving her family, she will now strengthen because she is prepared to live on her own. However, this viewpoint is inaccurate because it gives Nora way too much credit and it doesn’t focus on the thoughts and feelings of her children.This point shows that she is far more intelligent than people give her credit for and she will be able to make it on her own.That is incorrect. Nora is determined, but knows nothing about the world, her determination will not be good enough to support her as she discovers how to live along as a single parent. Because of these things, it is clear that, although some may agree, Nora did not make the best decision to go against society’s expectations of her and leave her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Nora, a complex character from Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, changes throughout the play as the audience watches her develop into a very different woman, untypical of the Victorian era. As a house wife, she is expected to obey and respect her husband, however she misbehaves during the first act, behaves desperately in the second, and abandons her husband for her own sake in the final act.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Nora is known to be childish because she let her husband control her. In his eyes he feels that Nora doesn’t have a mind of her own. He thinks that since he provides for her she has to obey by his rules. He only treats her like a child because she lets him. If Nora spoke up for herself and act more like and adult she would get the respect she deserve.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A women was not capable of taking on serious issues especially without a higher education. Women were only seen as the caretaker of the household and not the moneymaker. Nora’s decision at the end of the play, played a big role, Nora realizes that she needs to find herself, and not her husband Helmer. The play does not tell us where Nora goes at the end of a play, it leaves us in awe. Maybe Nora left because she wanted a higher education, and in Norway that wasn’t permitted at that time. Nora wants to start a new life without her husband Helmer, she has no money because Helmer was taking care of her. Nora just wants to have her own life, and maybe that means for her to get a higher education and get a job where she doesn’t have to depend on Helmer. I never thought about it in that way until I researched, the question about women’s role in Norway in the 19th century. Many women were dependent on their husbands, or a male figure in there life. Nora was always dependent on Helmer and her father, “I mean that I was simply transferred from Papa’s hand to yours . You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as you or else I pretended to. I am really not quite sure which I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other” (Ibsen, 66). Ibsen created the character Nora as woman who wasn’t following the social marriage norms. When Nora leaves the house, she becomes a symbol for all women, and the article by Largueche shows us how women fought for their education and social norm rights. Some questions still remain, where did Nora go? And did she leave because she wanted a higher education or did she just want to find her true identity? If I were to explore the topic further, I would want their to be a second part to the play “A Doll’s House”. I want to know where Nora went and if she ever got back with Helmer.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Her life was ruled and controlled by her husband Torvald. Her husband especially did not respect or treat Nora with equality. Nora spent eight years of her life with Torvald, and that is where she had made a huge mistake. Nora found out her husband’s true colours when it was too late, if she had found out who her husband really was and how the love he was showing to Nora was nothing but false she could have left her husband before the eight years and lived her life with freedom. Nora can find someone that actually treats her with respects, equality, and with…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This only seeks to reduce her place as a human being while further digging her into the belief that her existence is to be Torvalds eye candy and plaything. In the end, the stoic anger that has accumulated from Torvalds constant arrogance and belittlement boils over. Nora…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason Nora’s choice to leave her family is correct, is that she has the right to find someone who loves and takes her serious. In the first serious discussion Torvald and Nora had, she asks him, “Does it occur to you that this is the first time we two, you and I, man and wife, have ever had a serious talk together?”(Ibsen 1120). Nora also points out how for “eight years they never exchanged a serious word on a serious subject” (Ibsen 1120), which ultimately demonstrates how Torvald never thought Nora serious…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora Morally Ambiguous

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Krogstadʻs blackmail and the disturbance that follows do not change Nora’s nature instead they open her eyes to her unfulfilled and underappreciated potential. She begins to inform Torvalds that she basically has been performing tricks for him during an argument. Nora…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora's second change from society views was shown by her decision to leave Torvald and her children. Society demanded that she take a place under her husband By walking out she takes a position equal to her husband and brakes society's expectations. Nora also breaks society's expectations of staying in a marriage since divorce was frowned upon during that era. Her decision was a change from all expectations put on a woman and a wife by society.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with Nora’s decision to abandon her husband and children, she didn’t do it out of selfishness but more of a sacrifice. Nora loved her husband and children very much, but she felt she needed her freedom and independence. Nora didn’t want her children to be like her, she thought by her being immorality that it will pass down to her children, like it passed down to her from her father. Also, Nora realized she had a lot of growing up to do, because she acted like a child more than an adult. She was too dependent on her husband, so she wasn’t independent as a women and wasn’t capable of doing things on her on. Nora husband treated her like a play toy, more than a wife. I think by Nora leaving was a selfless thing to do, because she wanted…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I must try to educate myself” (214). She is telling the reader that she is going to do what she wants for herself, and not what society thinks she should do. Nora's conflict represents something other than, or something more than, woman's (Templeton 2). She does not care if her actions defy the norms of the female gender that society has put forth and she tells Helmer…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen was first performed in 1879 when European society strictly enforced male supremacy over women. The play consists of a middle class couple, Torvald and Nora Helmer, who seem to have the perfect marriage, three children, and a pending respectable income with the husband’s recent promotion to bank manager. Torvald treats Nora like a doll, manicuring and manipulating her looks and actions. Although his controlling demeanor is concealed by innocent nicknames and monetary allowances, the affects of his domination over his wife are eventually exposed. At the end of the play, Nora leaves in a haze of anguish after her husband fails to defend her when she is accused of legal fraud in a loan she had taken to save Torvald’s life. Some people say that Nora was right to leave and flee the control of her demeaning husband to seek her individuality, but many argue the contrary when considering what she left behind, what she could have demanded and changed at home, and what she would face as an independent woman defending herself in a 19th century, male biased society. Although some may assertively argue that Nora was right to leave her home, others suggest the she was not right to leave considering the abandonment of her children, the responsibility she could have demanded from her husband, and the prejudice against independent women in her society.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Doll's House

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the midst of what seemed like the perfect marriage, Nora realized how imperfect it really was and figured out what was best for her even if it meant her giving up all she had. This imperfection starts to settle in while she was talking with and old friend, Ms.Linde, in act one. By the beginning of Act two she has come to the full conclusion of her unhappiness and resolved to kill herself. This idea changed to a less dramatic ending of her just leaving her family behind, which would cost her everything but at the same time it was happy because she comes to the realization through her actions that she has been treated as a doll for her whole life first by her father then later by her husband and has never been taken seriously. When her husband finds out about her illegal deeds to save his life and lashes out, it hits her with full force that what they have is all imaginary. This may seem sad, her leaving her children and lifestyle, but it is good because she realizes she is independent and ready to be treated as if she was her own person and not a doll with no real purpose or power other than to be played with.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gene Heyman is a psychologist associated with Harvard University, who wrote the book, Addiction: A Disorder of Choice, said, “The first people to call addiction a disease were members of the 17th-century clergy. They were looking at alcoholism and they didn't describe it as sin or as crime. (Gillis, Charlie).” Heyman has a theory as to why society thinks this way; we can not understand why people would voluntarily cause themselves harm. We simply don’t understand why they wouldn’t stop and because scientists, doctors, and psychologists can’t explain voluntary self-destructive behavior, they deem it a disorder or disease. In an interview, Heyman stated, “In the medical world, in economics, in psychology and in the clergy, they really have no category for this, no way of…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbles In Children

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Standards targeted- To recognize children’s efforts, providing children opportunities to make choices, and letting children do things on their own independently.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Applied Linguistics

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages

    * We see learning in different ways (Behavior –habit formation-; Innatism –response to behaviorism- ). “If we learn through habits, what about children?…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays