Preview

Why Is Patrick Carr Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Patrick Carr Important
Patrick Carr was not a politician, or a general, or anything of much influence. He was a common working man. Although he became important to the American Revolution after death. More importantly, where, when, and by whom he was killed. Also what he said in the few days before he passed on.
Patrick Carr was born between 1739 and 1740. He was an Irish journeyman and apprentice to “Mr. Field, a leather-breeches-maker” (Boston 1775). He grew up in Ireland and was familiar with soldiers and street mobs. So on March 5th, 1770, (date of the Boston Massacre) Carr probably knew that the British were the insinuators of the disturbance. While traversing the street, the soldiers fired and Carr was shot. The bullet went through his abdomen, or stomach. Death was
…show more content…
His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry was a lawyer and politician between (1736-1799). Patrick Henry was a leading figure of the american revolutionary period. Patrick was a opponent of the stamp and townshend acts levied by England. Patrick was best know for the saying Give me liberty or give me death speech to the Virginia assembly in 1775. Patrick had a role in the overthrow of the royally appointed Virginia and was elected governor. Patrick criticisms helped bring about the amendments that became the bill of rights. Patrick was a failure as a p;anter and storekeeper but then had a success as a lawyer and politician. Patrick opposed the tariffs imposed by the townshend acts and the british attempt to collect them by using the Royal Navy and naval courts martial.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry was the first and the sixth governor of Virginia. Henry led antagonism to the Stamp Act in 1765 and he is mostly remembered by his speech,”Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death”. He was know as one of the most influential bodies in Republicanism. While he was creeping up on his twenty fourth birthday, he finally qualified as a lawyer in 1760. After that, Henry was not prepared for what it took to be a lawyer. Not to mention Patrick’s political…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCullough strategically and chronologically delineates each battle of the Revolution beginning with the Battle of Bunker Hill. Throughout each of the battles, McCullough thoroughly explains the colonial struggles and accomplishments as he also displays the British as a nasty group of individuals who were hard-hearted with loyalty to the Crown. However, most of the Loyalists simply feared the British royalty as punishment for treason was overbearingly harsh. Although biased, McCullough carefully displays the American Revolution as brutal for both the British and the colonists. He writes of “the most crucial year” from a cardinal view, concentrating emphasis on American strategy rather than British strategy. He acknowledges the British’s major distress, yet he undermines the importance of the drudgery of the Loyalists, disregarding the punishments that they were forced to endure by the colonists. Some of these castigations include the practice of tarring and feathering and merciless murder.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would describe Patrick Henry as an intelligent, honest man having strong moral principles. He lived a full life, marrying twice and having 17 children. He was a lawyer, five term govenor of Virginia and member of the Virginia House of Burgesses. He fought for the Bill of Rights and was an important figure in the American Revolution. "Born on May 29th, 1736 in Studley, Virginia, he was the son of John Henry and Sarah Winston". During his childhood he attended a local school and was later tutored by his father. At the age of 16 Patrick opened a store with his brother but it quickly failed. At 18 he married his first wife, Sarah Shelton, and attempted a career as a planter which didn't go well so he returned to shopkeeping and sadly failed a second time. Later he took a job at Hanover Tavern, where he worked with his father-in-law and began to study law. Patrick Henry was self taught but he managed to persuade a panel of attorneys that…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defend your actions. Critical thinking 2 In the years leading up to the American Revolution, the British sought to establish firm control over their American Colonies. The Boston Massacre also known as “Incident on king street “occurred on march 5, 1770.On evening of the march 5, a lone British sentry guarded the entrance to the Boston Customs house where officials collected import duties for the king .The sentry got into an argument with a barber’s apprentice and swung his musket at him , hitting the boy on the head .Other…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patrick Carr was born between 1739 and 1740. He was an Irish journeyman and apprentice to “Mr. Field, a ‘leather-breeches-maker’” ‘material made by tanning animal skin - short pants that end at the knee - maker’ (Boston 1775). Carr grew up in Ireland and was familiar with soldiers and street mobs. So on March 5th, 1770, (date of the Boston Massacre) Carr probably knew that the British were the insinuators of the disturbance. While traversing the street, the soldiers fired and…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soldiers fired at the the crowd. Then the colonists were up and arms about the Boston Massacre so the King and Parliament were forced to have the soldiers tried in court at the colonies and The King had John Adams be the lawyer for the soldiers and John Adams accepted because he thought everyone deserves the right to a lawyer. “Quickly becoming known as the Boston Massacre, the episode further propelled the colonies toward war with the British. Flames were fanned even more when the eight soldiers involved in the incident and their captain Thomas Preston were acquitted on the grounds of…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the episode Join or Die, everything starts at the point of the Boston Massacre, due to the Coercive Acts, and most of the hour is spent on debating and choosing sides in court. After the event occurs, John Adams is asked to represent the English guards in the Massachusetts court of law. After hearing their story, he decided that representing them would only be right and just to the law. The viewers do not get to see John Adams’ planning process in the case, other than accepting it, since it jumps directly to the court scene. Here, the people of Massachusetts proceed in saying that the commander of the English guards, Captain Preston, told his men to fire upon the crowd of civilians. Adams opposes this and provides facts and evidence that contradict every part of the civilian argument, which is how he earns acquittal for the case against the guards. Later, Adams is offered a prominent position in the name of the King, but turns it down, which results in his appointment to the Continental Congress. This is where the episode ends, with Adams leaving his family and riding off to join the Congress.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was a man who believed in the law, and in fair play. If the soldiers could not get a fair trial, were we any better than the British and their high handed ways.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Lee

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Charles Lee, a general in the American Revolutionary war, is a historic figure in American history. Serving under George Washington, Charles Lee participated in a number of battles. However, history says Charles Lee was treacherous to the cause, all the while that he was in command during that time; he was acting in bad faith toward the Americans. His influence in the army was, at all times, mischievous (General Charles Lee: Traitor of the American Revolution). To the British, Charles Lee was a traitor who turned on England to fight under George Washington. Due to Charles Lee’s treacherous actions against America, it would lead to his downfall in the following years.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry was born in May of 1736 in Hanover County, Virginia. He served in the Virginia House of Burguesses and wrote persuasive speeches that opened the eyes of the colonists and make them see that they were being enslaved. Patrick Henry was the seed of motivation, and the driving force that the colonist needed in order to be free and stand up for what they think its fair. He was important to the revolutionary war efforts because, he encourage people to fight for their rights and not give up.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atticus Finch , the lawyer that helped Tom Robinson in his case, made a closing statement before the jury were on there way to see if Tom should be pointed guilty or not guilty,” The state has not produced one iota of medical evidence to the effect that the crime Tom Robinson is charged with ever took place. It has relied instead upon the testimony of two witnesses whose evidence has not only been called into serious question to cross-examination, but has…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry- not at convention because he was chosen by Virginia but declined to serve; professed to fee in fearsome doc. the death warrant of liberty…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays