Preview

Why Is The Justice System Unfair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Justice System Unfair
Our justice system today can be unfair in the way we decide who is guilty for what crime and how to punish them for that crime. There are many factors that play into how we decide what's best to do with a criminal. There are also many factors that have nothing to do with the crime but they play a part in deciding your fate.

Depending on what time of day it is could mean you could go to prison. If it's late in the day the judge and jury could be ready to go home so they are willing to decide you are guilty just so they can leave sooner. If our justice system was more eye for an eye then whatever the person did if they were proven guilty the same thing would happen to them. There would still need to be a trial but once they were proven guilty that would be the end of it.
…show more content…

If you look trashy or homeless some people might think you don't know your rights and they could try to take advantage you not knowing. And if they are just looking for a conviction then you could go to jail for something you didn't do. So depending on what they did it might not be to bad but it would be better than spending time in prison for someone else's mistake.

Another factor is who you know or how much money you have. If your family is a judge and they get your case they could take it easy on you. And if your family has money they could try to buyout the judge for him to maybe give you a shorter sentence. If we didn't have this kind of justice system then he wouldn't be going to jail and the family couldn't buy off the judge because whatever he did would be done to


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, the main issue to consider when charging or sentencing someone for a crime should be the offense and the sanctions that pertain to that charge. The criminal justice system regards itself as being fair and impartial, and that the law is equal for everyone regardless of their financial status. Some argue that money does play a big…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of time, society has not always accepted that the punishment fits the crime. There is always uncertainty and bitterness with the belief that the punishment has been too harsh or too lenient.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the use of a judge to listen to both sides of the trial, to the impartial jury that is used to decide the verdict of the trial. Everyone in the courtroom is there to offer a fair, and safe trial for whomever may have charges brought against them. It may be true that there are many things within the Criminal Justice system that may not work efficiently or even effectively, however there is nothing that is perfect. There is something to be said when it comes to the American Justice system; it gets many things right when it comes to equal rights and fairness for the American…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A judge will take into account the guidelines set forth by the State’s Penal Code, as well as those brought forward by the defense attorney. An offender’s criminal history, involvement in the crime, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime will all be considered in deciding whether to hand down a harsher or more lenient punishment. An offender who is considered a first-time offender may be granted leniency or a reduced sentence, but strong arguments can be made in favor and opposition of such a practice. Finally, punishment serves multiple purposes, for the victims of crime as well as the public, and the benefit for all involved should be considered. Ultimately, the judge will review all mitigating circumstances and deliver what he or she believes to be a fair sentence for each individual…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is fair to be tried in both civil and criminal court for the same alleged actions because they deal with different aspects of the crime. For civil cases, it deals with whether you are liable or not, while in criminal cases it's whether your guilty or not. You can be found not guilty in a criminal case, however, you can still be found liable in civil cases. It is only fair that the victims get awarded damages. Furthermore, it is not against the 5th amendment since the defendant won't be at risk of life or limb in civil cases. Moreover, those found guilty in criminal cases are rarely brought against in civil torts. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with being tried in a criminal and civil court for the same crime.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In summary if people such as Sable were given fair sentencings for their crimes less people could be in jail which would save state tax dollars to be put into schools and hospitals. People get extreme sentencings for the crimes they commit which are not deserving of them, more people should get the chance to be put on parole and show that they can positively contribute to their community. It is important to help people create a better life for themselves if they are willing to work and commit themselves to it. When someone fails at something they need to be picked up and given a second chance to show they can do better just as many prisoners need. The Prison-Industrial Complex System receives millions of citizens’ tax dollars to…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is there times where you didn’t receive the justice that you deserved? The justice system is not fair like the government says it is. The rich people use money to help influence decisions. There is still racism in our justice system that put people in jail that don’t belong there. Corrupt people could become judges or police officers that don’t give fair decisions. Not all trials are fair because there is bias in America's justice system.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To answer if America’s criminal justice system is fair and just is a hard question to answer and discuss. The reason behind that statement is because there are so many reasons for why it is fair and just, and then there are many reasons also why it is not fair and just. This topic is something people argue over all the time and one that doesn’t have a correct or wrong answer. If I had to answer this question right away I would say that I am in the middle, I say that because of after reading the chapter on crime It made me see all the problems our criminal justice system has that needs working out.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    sentencing

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the main problems with sentencing in the courts today is the broad nature of the crimes committed, in the legal system of England and Wales criminal offences are very broadly defined and can have widely varying degrees of severity, for example theft could be anything from stealing a chocolate bar from a corner shop, all of the way up to stealing the crown jewels.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The size that is required at the maximum number of people on a jury has been adjusted from twelve to only six and it no longer requires a unanimous vote in most countries, but to a two-thirds majority vote. This means that only four out of six people need to vote one way for it to be the standing ruling. That is if the jury even going to be tried, most cases are settled before the trial. The unpredictable results and the money involved in running a trial has also “driven many institutional litigants […] to demand that their customers waive trial by jury and accept […] arbitration” (Dershowitz 455). This allows them to make the process of settling…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine a completely innocent individual being convicted for a crime he or she had no involvement in but being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The individual lives out his or her jail sentence in an orderly fashion only to be found not guilty after more than a decade with the discovery of vital evidence produced by advanced technology. This is just one of countless cases of wrongful conviction of innocent people by the justice system. Since 1989, countless of cases were found wrongfully convicted after the case had been closed, but were reopened thanks to the advancement in the justice system such as the usage of DNA testing. Problem is, if this is the state of our justice system at the moment, where there is such a large chance of someone being wrongfully accused and having to serve in prison for so many years and only to be released after the damage has already been done, one would always fear that type of justice system. The innocent should fear the justice system no matter how…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equity is defined as the sentencing principle that similar crimes and similar criminals should be treated alike. (Frank Schmalleger, 2007)Equity in sentencing has been an issue for quite a while. It has sparked heated discussions in the U.S. Congress, as well as arguments among community members. Supporters of equity in sentencing try to inspire changes to our current legislation, and its opponents are attempting to abolish it in its entirety.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our criminal justice system is not perfect, and never will be, meaning there always is a chance for a jury to convict an innocent person. Juries convict on the standard that the defendant…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays