Bennet had in the marriage of her daughters. Mrs. Bennet was not able to speak to her daughters’ suitors in the same manner as her permission was not necessary for them to marry. Her husband’s permission was. Austen was criticizing the gender roles that were prevalent in society in the 1810s by using satire to make Mrs. Bennet as ridiculous as possible. Wilde is doing the same thing to an extent. Even though he portrays Lady Bracknell as overbearing and a bit ridiculous with the questions she asks Jack, the fact still remains that in 1890s England Lady Bracknell has power over her daughter’s …show more content…
Lady Bracknell says, “Never speak disrespectfully of Society, Algernon. Only people who can’t get into it do that” (349). She continues by explaining that Algernon has nothing but debts and says, “But I do not approve of mercenary marriages. When I married Lord Bracknell I had no fortune of any kind. But I never dreamed for a moment of allowing that to stand in my way” (349). Her own husband had nothing when they were married, and she was the one who pushed them forward into society and up the proverbial ladder. Consent for the marriage is given at that point. It is no coincidence that she had just found out the vast fortune to which Cecily was entitled upon her coming of age. Wilde uses this circumstance to further Lady Bracknell’s gauche ideas, thus increasing the somewhat uncouth portrait of the older upper class Victorian