Why Multiculturalism Can T End Racism Analysis

ENG 105, Sample Student Critical Summaries

Summary of “Why Multiculturalism Can’t End Racism” In the article “Why Multiculturalism Can’t End Racism,” Marlene Nourbese Philip discusses how multiculturalism promotes discrimination opposed to stopping it. Philip explains that there is inequality between different cultures and races in Canada; the Canadian government only recognizes the French and English in the constitution. Examples of genocidal practices against natives, past treatment of Chinese and Indian immigrants, and the preference of white European immigrants are used to explain unfairness amongst cultures in Canada and white supremacy. Philip believes Canadians can one day achieve equality among races but only if a strong, united effort is made.
Works Cited:
Philip Nourbese, Marlene. “Why Multiculturalism Can’t End Racism.” Word and World. Ed.
Kent Lewis. Toronto: Nelson, 2008. 112-116. Print.

Summary of “In Defense of Tree-Spiking”
He asserts that tree spiking is a legitimate technique to reduce logging. Examples of his personal experience of the practice, and reports of success from abroad are cited as proof of its efficacy. Considerations of safety for fallers and mill workers - whom opponents say are endangered by the practice - are addressed by recollecting his investigation into the matter, performed under the guise of an insurance agent. The core of his argument is his assertion that logging is immoral and thus spiking is necessary to protect defenseless innocents. That a –by his assertion –morally imperative endeavour is denounced is the result of an anthropocentric bias by those who oppose