this statement. He explains in the chapter how legal problems, economics, fear of rebellion are all main factors in causing racism. What Zinn doesn't mention, but what the researcher thinks is also important is religion was a main factor as well. Many of the laws that were enforced in the colonial times contributed to racism. Before these laws began to pop up, the colonies were in turmoil. The Virginians were in their starving period and were desperate for food. They needed labor quickly to make enough food to survive. The Virginians were so desperate in fact, that during 1609-1610, they would dig up graves and eat the corpses. Many of these colonists were not fit to work in fields, John Smith declared a sort of martial law to organize the colonists into work gangs and forced them in the fields for survival. When the slaves started rolling in, laws began to pop up about the slaves, despite the fact that slavery was not yet legalized. In 1639, a law was passed that allowed "all persons except Negroes" to obtain arms and ammunition to fight off the rogue Indians. When three servants tried to escape in 1640, the white servants were penalized with additional years on their contracts, but the Negro John Punch was forced to serve the rest of his life. Another example of how laws caused racism was in 1640 when a Negro woman begot a child by a white man. The woman was sent to the whipping post, and the man had to do public penance. Despite the fact that black and white servants often worked together and became friends, laws were created to forbid those relationships. An example of this would be in 1661 when a law in Virginia was passed that if any English servant would run away with a Negro, the servant would be forced to do a special service for the master of the Negro. Another such law was in 1691 that declared banishment of any "white man or woman being free who shall intermarry with a Negro, mulatoo, or Indian man or woman bond or free." The Virginia slave code read on escaping slaves "if the slave does not immediately return, anyone whatsoever may kill or destroy such slaves by such ways and means as he shall see fit." These laws basically forced the white colonists, whether free or a servant, to not have any type of relationship with Negroes, thus extending the racial barrier. Zinn also contributes racism growing due to economic conditions. In the poor south the plantation system was beginning to grow rapidly. Indentured servants were becoming more scarce as the economic conditions in England were improving causing less people to come to the colonies. The servants in the colonies were not enough to meet the needs of the plantations. Due to this, the colonies began to import slaves from Africa at a large rate. In 1700 there were only 6,000 slaves. In 1763 however, there was 170,000 slaves, which was about half the population. The black slaves were a lot easier to enslave than the Indians or whites. Eventually the number of black slaves in the south was 3 million. The greedy and mostly illiterate southerners began to continuously import more and more slaves to get more profit from crops. The slaves would rarely openly rebel against the owners, but would use sabotage as their main threat.
The profits slavery brought was amazing for the rich owners. James Madison told a visitor shortly after the Revolution that he could make $257 on every Negro in a year and only spend $12 to $13 on the estate. Zinn also offered a different viewpoint from Landon Carter who complained that his slaves neglected their work. Rebellion was another reason Zinn described as being a main cause of racism.
The African slaves would often try to escape to try and reunite with their families. Rebellious slaves would often burn tobacco crops, kill overseers or try and run away. Mass hysteria began to increase rapidly across the colonies, as owners became more fearful that their large number of slaves or servants would rebel. To help Zinn's argument, he wrote how black slaves and white servants would often try and escape together, get drunk together and have relationships with one another. The slave masters often perceived the servants in the same manner as the slaves. Getting back to rebellion, Boston passed laws that if any slaves who were on their own gathered in groups of two or more would be sentenced with whipping. In 1663 a group of white servants and black slaves in Gloucester County, Virginia were planning to rebel against their masters to gain their freedom. The plan was exposed and the slaves were executed. The fear of rebellion of blacks led to deep hatred between the blacks and
whites. Zinn's reasons for why racism is from nurture rather than natural is very accurate. The reasons he stated for this was the laws imposed on slaves, economic conditions and rebellions. I do feel that religion was also a major role player in the causes as well. The bible considers the color black with the devil and all of other evil. The Crusades also may have played a role as well, as it was the white Christians versus the colored Muslims. So for all these reasons, not one of them is "natural". Because these ideas are not natural feelings towards different races, there is hope that perhaps one day, racism may be eliminated from the world. It is unfortunate that the War in Iraq is going on though as that helps extend the gap between different religions and races. If there is going to be a change in today's world, it is important that we look at the facts that Zinn presents us with and understand that we don't have to have racial tension, that it only happened due to events in the past, that those events are over with and this is a different world. Though race is one form of prejudice caused by nurture, religious prejudice is also caused by nurture. The role that major religions played in causing and perpetuating racism, and the associated violence that went with it, must be acknowledged and the sin of racism must be confessed as part of the healing process. The churches' recent record of standing with the oppressed is notable. It is essential that the church continues to speak out against oppression and support those who resist violence. As churches draw up their plans to stop violence, racism must be included. For many people it is easy to recognize and name violence associated with wars, ethnic cleansing, and state aggression against its own citizens. However we must understand and make links between the root causes of violence against individuals and other forms of violence. The fear, hatred, dislike and the negative attitude towards people because of their ethnicity, color, cast, religion, class or gender, when nurtured and fuelled by those who have the advantage of possessing economic, military or political power, can be turned into the ugly and obscene annihilation of people and a total disregard of their humanity. The church can, and must, nurture a culture of non-violence and restore through a healing process a world where we can live in peace and without fear. To do this, the church must be bold and confident in leading the way to a better common understanding and respect for human rights of all people. Politics like religion also plays a major role that nurture produces. Many in the country have prejudice towards certain political parties. Some favor the great democratic party, who care about lives and middle class citizens, while some favor the power hungry Republicans who think that angering other people through violence will bring about peace and give themselves some extra money in their pockets. These democrats or republicans often feel hostility towards each other through learned prejudices. Republicans believe that Democrats are weak and too kind whereas Democrats believe that Republicans are evil, cold blooded, corrupt scoundrels which is an accurate assumption the researcher must add. But where do these people receive these feelings you must ask. Certainly there is no gene that determines ones beliefs. The answer is that there is no personality gene and that through watching parents and peers opinions, people tend to gravitate towards one party or another. How one grows up will also have an effect on their political preferences. Examples of this would include if you grow up in a middle to lower class family where you must work hard for your money, you will tend to be more liberal and caring. Should you grow up as a spoiled rich kid who gets whatever he/she wants and is set for life easily, it is likely you will be a cold-hearted Republican. To verify this assumption of nurture over 2/3 of kids have embraced their parents or peers values as they often learn of morals and values through their parents.