Preview

Why Should A Prince Understand How To Use Well Both The Man And The Beast

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
681 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should A Prince Understand How To Use Well Both The Man And The Beast
Analysis of Machiavelli’s The Prince
1. Why should a Prince understand how to “use well both the man and the beast”? There are times when leaders must be both a beast and a man. When leaders are the man, they display respect and truthfulness. They understand how to talk with people to get things done. When leaders are the beast, leaders are focused on their own agenda and will manipulate and deceive others to achieve their goal. Leaders will mask their true intentions to those who have been faithful to them. When leaders are the beast, the leaders will look to others as being reprehensible but to the leaders their actions are necessary to preserve the organization.
2. What is Machiavelli’s advice in regard to a Prince keeping his word, using deception and having “all the good qualities” (such as mercy, good faith, integrity, humanity and religion)?
…show more content…

I think Machiavelli means leaders need to show their followers their human qualities. When using these qualities, leaders get people to believe what they are doing is in the best interest of everyone. Leaders get people on their side and the people do not see they are being manipulated to believe in what leaders want them to believe. But in reality, leaders are manipulating people to do what they want to achieve their objective. Machiavelli believes it is better to be feared than to be loved. If people fear their leader, they are less likely to rise up against the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the excerpt Machiavelli uses logos to talk about this issue in a logical manner. His first step in approaching this topic is when he states to the reader that others have tried to discuss how a prince should act. Machiavelli states that he is doing something along the same lines but what he says is that a prince must be able to do what is not…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    places the author at the mercy of the reader and prepares them to hear an idea…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Paper Evvver

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli says this because when a Prince is feared people will respect him and do what he says and they will love him and praise him. It is also possible to be both feared and loved but it is very difficult and only great rulers are able to create the balance.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Machiavelli believes that the higher road should be taken whenever possible, there are situations that may require that a leader set aside traditional morality in favor of cunning and trickery. As a pragmatist, he sees morality as a barrier to success in certain cases: "…it is necessary for a prince who wishes to maintain his position to learn how not to be good." (Machiavelli, 127) Machiavelli's prince must learn how not to be good, because "…it is not necessary for a prince to have all of the above-mentioned qualities, but it is very necessary for him to appear to have them." (Machiavelli, 135) As a leader, the prince is subject to specific standards by the people and must always have a favorable and consistent public…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These two men have a general idea of what a leader should be like. Machiavelli has a more ideal approach to leadership in today 's world. You have to take action in order to be taken serious by your people and the enemies around you. A ruler must have the respect of the people around him/her in order to be successful. That statement goes back to the idea of it being better to be hated than to be loved, most people take advantage of or don 't respect the idea of love, so it doesn 't do any justice to be loved by everyone as a…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that a ruler must do all in his or hers power to not be at a disadvantage. As being an elitist in society, one must always be ‘beast-like’. Having a disadvantage will put them in a situation to not reach their self-interests. The powerful must use any strategy to be authoritative. There are many present day situations that exemplifies Machiavelli’s points in The Prince.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that everyone should be ready for any attack or for him or her to be able to defend his country. Machiavelli says “… in peacetime he must train himself more than in time of war” (3). What he is saying that the peacetime that is given, they are to be training the most. He believes that a leader should have his soldiers ready for action. He would train with them daily. He set up multiple training stations to know their way in and how to escape difficult traps. Machiavelli as a leader would have them well trained because he knows at any moment any one would attack him. He rather is feared than loved, so that would only make many people hate him. He would act like he showed interest in his people but only did that so people would be on his side during times of…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s text, The Prince, includes a list of traits that he thought a Prince should possess. An…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays