Preview

Why Should Drones Be Banned From Military Warfare?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should Drones Be Banned From Military Warfare?
Drones should be Banned from Military Warfare

Since the first appearance of military drones in 1982, drones have been widely used as a weapon of war as it does not risk the pilot’s life in a war besides being a deadly and efficient in strikes. Unfortunately, drones are not only deadly towards the terrorists but also towards innocent civilians as drones attack had kill so many innocent civilians. In Yemen alone, around 70% of casualties from six drones attack launched by the United States in 2009, 2012 and 2013 were innocent civilians such as children, pregnant mothers and old folks (Whitlock 2013). Although some people argue that military drones are efficient and the safest weapon to engage in war without harming the pilot, military drones
…show more content…
According to Amnesty International (Moskowitz 2013), the government does not take any responsibility toward the death of innocent civilians that was accidently killed during the drone strikes against the terrorist. However, they believe that the strikes were a success as it managed to wipe out the terrorists that were located in the targeted area. This act is selfish as it is taking its toll on innocent mothers and children that has no idea about what is happening around them. Next, it is an obvious violation of international human law when the human rights of the innocent people that was killed in drone strikes are being ignore (Akulov 2012). According to the law that we abide with, trials will be made upon execution of innocent people. However, there were no trials made toward the incumbent administration upon the death of innocent people caused by drone attacks. Without any relevant action taken, it is considered as a war crime as the rights of drone attacks victims are not being justify but only to be ignored and disrespected. Other than that, drone attacks are against the international law when it is launched by a non-belligerent country towards other countries (Akulov 2012). For example, the United States are violating the Article 51 of U. N Charter that states, attack on others …show more content…
These three major reasons clearly show the solid reason form the government to reconsider the usage of drones in military warfare. The administration ought to put a stop on the usage of the drones as worst consequences may be faced in the future because the world now is not as safe as it used to be and may will misuse the drones and its deadly feature. They might use it as a threat to other country who does not own drones. As we are living in the world where technologies are rapidly improving and innovating, so will the drones. It will become more dangerous and lethal in the future. Hence, it will provoke war amongst the big countries and make the world a less safe place. So, I suggest the military department to stay with the current weapon without drones but to come up with better and wiser strategy to overcome threats from other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Increased security threats caused by heightened global terror activities, for instance, sectarian groups or Mexican drug empires, has prompted the development of decisive technologies, which will respond directly to the increased sophistication of these radical groups. A reliable technology is the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) commonly known as a drone. The drone not only investigates a terror environment but also conducts aerial strikes. The commencing research will analyze in detail the positive impacts of the drone to homeland security.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones Dbq Analysis

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The American society in which we grew up is one that prides itself on the advancements we continuously make in the technological field. Though there is some value in the use of devices to aid our lazy American culture, the sacrifices of opening our skies to the new drone age greatly outweighs the benefits of making life easier than it already is. While many companies shift to now offer drone delivery right to our doorsteps, the administrators in charge are not paying attention to the laundry list of determinants that can result from our growing reliance and dependence on something which stands as a want as opposed to a necessity. Drones should not be regarded as the top technological success…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones are not expensive to make and are very effective. Drone attacks have saved people’s lives. The traditional way of war is very dangerous. Men have to be physically out on the battlefield, fighting, not knowing if they are going to make it out alive. Yes guns, tanks, bombs, and many more weapons are being used, but they would not know if they had hit their target or not. Also, more damage is made to people’s…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays