Preview

Why the Normans won the battle of hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Normans won the battle of hastings
Why Did the Normans Win the Battle of Hastings?

On 5th January in the year 1066, England’s king, Edward the Confessor died. Unfortunately he had no heir, so three men were competing for the throne. These were called; Harold Godwineson, William, Duke of Normandy, and Harald Hardraada. Harold Godwineson stole the throne and became the king. Both William and Harald were furious and were prepared to fight for the country, thus creating the battle of Stamford Bridge and later on, the battle of Hastings

Harold Godwineson was extremely unlucky. When both of the other competitors decided to attack, he didn’t know who would arrive first. He could either take his army north to where Harald’s Viking army would go, or south to wait for William to arrive. He had to guess which way to go and he knew that if he chose the wrong way, he would be letting the entire country down. Eventually he chose north. The army marched north and finally met the Vikings on the 25th September the same year. They fought, and the Saxons won with Harald himself amongst the dead. Although they had conquered one army, many of Harold’s men were injured if not dead, and they now had to march an exhausting two-hundred-and-sixty miles to meet the Normans.

Another main reason that the Normans won was because William had prepared a lot more than Harold for this battle. With him he had brought an astonishing seven thousand, five hundred men to fight with him, who were all fully trained, and about another four or five thousand to help, such as doctors, blacksmiths, chefs and so on. Harold brought about five hundred housecarls, who were fully trained fighters, along with around seven thousand fryd, who were just peasants that he picked up along the way.
The army of the Saxons were desperately in need of rest after their march through the country, but the odds were not in their favour. The battle began almost immediately, so Harold’s men did not have any time to plan an attack or anything. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harold Godwinson was the richest man in England and had been Earl of Wessex for many years. He had been the advisor for Edward the Confessor as well as Edward’s brother-in-law because his sister married Edward in 1045. Harold was one of the most powerful nobles in England, which proves he was an experienced warrior; the Godwin family had also established alliances with all of the major noblemen in England. He understood how England should’ve been governed therefore proving himself to be a good leader. Additionally, Harold was the Witan’s choice to become king.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They worked through the night making sure that they secured their position especially since they were outnumbered and low on ammunition and gun powder. On the morning of June 17, 1775, the first shots were fired from the British war ships in Boston Harbor and the initial ground assault then began, led by Major General William Howe and Brigadier General Robert Pigot. The British attacked from Bunker Hill but the majority of the fighting was done on Breed’s Hill. The British assaulted the hill three times in total. In the first two advances they were pushed back by the Americans and both times they retreated, but on the third attack the British received reinforcements which allowed them to subdue their rivals on the third assault.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Who were the Vikings? ------The Vikings were also traders , explorers and settlers. They were highly advanced and not as primitive and barbaric as they are portrayed.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could be argued that because the colonists did have the help of France, and that Britain was in a poor economic state. For one, Britain forced its soldiers to fight or sign up, and then trained them to follow every command. This meant that Britain had complete control over their soldiers. This also meant that they had more soldiers to fight with. More soldiers that are more skilled is, based on common sense, almost a guaranteed win. The final reason why it was improbable for the British to lose was that they had more supplies than the colonists. More supplies would mean a higher moral, and not as famished soldiers. These are a few of the reasons why Britain should have won, but there are some good reasons why they…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the Tapestry, this is depicted within the one-sidedness of the aforementioned battle preparations. This is seen from both the ability of the Normans to construct the boats needed to cross the Channel, the quick building of the motte-and-bailey castles for defence, and even in the number of forces that William was able to procure for the invasion. Although much of this can be attested to the perspective of the embroidery being from a pro-Norman viewpoint, it still nonetheless attests to an organized battle on the side of William pitted against a rushed Anglo-Saxon conglomeration. In actuality, this perhaps reflects the fact that the Anglo-Saxons, under King Harold, had recently faced two other invasions to the north. This is of no mention within the Tapestry, an omission that gives the Normans the appearance of defeating fierce army, but still allows for the depiction that Herlands force that was the lesser military…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Haralds Saga

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Harald first gained his political power after the Battle of Stikelsted. Haralds half-brother was King Olaf the Saint, they both fought side by side during the Battle of Stikelsted. During the battle his half brother Olaf was killed and Harold was also injured but managed to escape from the battlefield. During the escape he was helped by Rognvald Brusason and brought into Russia where he first met King Jaroslav. Jaroslav gave Harold the position of commander of his defense…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thanks to the friendly winds which guided us across the channel, we arrive unopposed on English shores. Defenses are built and fortified as the men, motivated by my words feast on food and wine as we await the moment of truth. We have the advantage over the enemy, for the horses we ride provide us strength and quickness. We are truly blessed that the English have turned back Harald Hadrada and the Norwegians at Stamford Bridge. Now there is one less opponent to fight for my crown. Though battle tested and weary, Harold of Wessex will not easily relinquish what is rightfully mine. Remember, it is Harold who swore allegiance to me after I freed him from Count Guy of Ponthieu. I gave him arms and armor as he swore the sacred oath upon saintly relics. That oath, a pledge to support my claim to the English throne was broken (New World Encyclopedia, 2009).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harold and his army had just finished fighting at Stamford Bridge, his soldiers were tired and wounded but Harold made his army march to Hastings which meant his army had no chance to recover. Even though Harold belived that his army could put all their effort into it. Also one of Harold's mistakes was whilst holding the shield wall together William's army ran toward Harold's. The right side of William's army turned around and ran away. After the shield wall broke, Harold's army ran straight ahead after them. The Normans split up into two columns then closed on Harold's army. This could be known as an envelopment.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays