Preview

why the normans won the battle of hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
why the normans won the battle of hastings
Why the Normans won the battle of Hastings

The reason why the Normans won the battle of Hasting

About 10 days before the Vikings landed at Stanford the Saxons were down in Hasting where they were expecting the Norman’s to come and attack. Unfortunately for William the winds where not very good in France and after a few days of waiting for the Normans word got out that Vikings had landed up in Stanford. The Saxons marched up as fast as they could, they won the battle of Stanford and then went back home, however shocking news awaited them, after all their waiting the Normans had landed down at Hastings.

Here is where another mistake happens, Harold marched straight down to Hastings after only 5 days of rest. He could have waited for William to come closer to his castle which would have given his men more time to rest. As William arrived Harold got his men to formed a shield wall.
William’s archers went first their aim was not great as they were shooting uphill consequently hitting the shield wall and soaring over their heads. Next William sent in his cavalry (men on horses) to attack but because there was a shield wall the hoses could not get past therefore the Normans were safe.
William reset his archers to a good position enabling his archers to get a good aim, as a result of this it created the smallest of cracks in the shield wall, the Norman’s took their chance and ran up to them. After about an hour some Norman’s on the left side retreated and drew some Saxons out with them creating a big gap William started to use that tactic more until there where cracks everywhere, William then lined his archers up once again and shot. This was the fatal moment; Harold got an arrow in his eye therefore causing his death. This had a big effect on the Saxon’s, they didn’t fight as well, some ran away, but others stayed to fight

In summary

The main reason why the Norman’s won was due to Harold’s death. After he died the Saxon’s lost all momentum,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Syllabus Nootes1

    • 4241 Words
    • 17 Pages

    - Armies at the centre of the “swing” were fortified, leaving those on the outside weak and slow…

    • 4241 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William did not know it yet, but by allowing this to happen he had already lost the battle before it began. All William had to do was put more guards…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final thing that caused Richard to lose the battle was his own solo assault on Tudor. It is believed that if Richard had…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luck and timing were central to William’s success at Hastings. Firstly, in advance of the campaign, two of William’s rivals had died; Henry, king of France and Count Fulk of Anjou. This was very significant to the campaign because it enabled William to leave Normandy feeling safe because his two main adversaries were dead, and permitted him to get to Hastings without agonizing over an invasion and to dedicate his full thought to the campaign which lay ahead. When he did embark on the campaign, the weather was in the favour of the Normans. Initially, William had intended to embark in July but owing to adverse winds, the invasion was delayed from the end of July to September; first at the River Dives and then at St. Valery on the Somme. Additionally the Navy were no longer at seas as only remained on the Seas until the 8th September. With the amalgamation of clear seas and good weather on the 28th September, the day of crossing, The Saxons crossed the channel in just over 24 hours. Moreover, unbeknownst to William, this also was an extremely auspicious time for him because if he had arrived at his intended time of crossing in July, Harold and the Saxon army would have been waiting for him. However, it was a time of unease for Harold that year, as it was apparent that England was going to be invaded by either a Norman or a Scandinavian Force, and so Harold was nervous throughout the entirety of his nine month rain. Harold, thinking that he could be ubiquitous, had troops both at the North and at the South, waiting in vain for these invasions; however this only tired out his troops and stretched his resources. The Scandinavians arrived first, and so Harold made the southern fyrd march north to fight the Vikings. The battles of Gate Fulford, led by Edwin and Morcar, and the Battle of Stanford Bridge, were both won by the Saxons, boosting their morale but nonetheless they suffered great losses and the troops were tired where…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bunker Hill Battle

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Col. Prescott's men would be the first attacked. This was the first charge with British army on the east side of the hill with the secondary doing a straight attack. General Howe's men lead the attack with 5,000 troops up the hill. But they were not alone; they were covered by cannon from British ships in the river. While this was going on, some of the British ships loaded their cannons with incendiary shells and annihilated Charlestown, where a fraction of American troops were sniping at British soldiers on the battlefield. The first attack failed. The British retreated.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1066 Year of the Conquest

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Saxon landowners surrendered their land to their protectors, someone more powerful than themselves. Independent farmers had no defense against the Viking raids or resources to tide them over other disasters like cattle sickness, a series of bad harvests, fire, or storms.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the 22nd of August 1485 Richard III, the last Plantagenet King, was defeated and killed in the Battle of Bosworth against Henry Tudor, who would found a dynasty which would feature the first Queen to rule in her own right and would last until 1603. Richard had over twice as many men as Henry but was defeated when, trying to get to Henry, Richard was slain by a rush of cavalry led by Sir William Stanley, the brother of Henry’s step father. However there are many contributing factors to Richard’s death and defeat including, Richard’s pride, Henry’s support from France and Wales, and the support from the Stanley’s at the crucial moment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the Tapestry, this is depicted within the one-sidedness of the aforementioned battle preparations. This is seen from both the ability of the Normans to construct the boats needed to cross the Channel, the quick building of the motte-and-bailey castles for defence, and even in the number of forces that William was able to procure for the invasion. Although much of this can be attested to the perspective of the embroidery being from a pro-Norman viewpoint, it still nonetheless attests to an organized battle on the side of William pitted against a rushed Anglo-Saxon conglomeration. In actuality, this perhaps reflects the fact that the Anglo-Saxons, under King Harold, had recently faced two other invasions to the north. This is of no mention within the Tapestry, an omission that gives the Normans the appearance of defeating fierce army, but still allows for the depiction that Herlands force that was the lesser military…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many correctly regard the Battle of Agincourt as a courageous English victory, a battle where men who were tired, hungry and standing in their own diarrhoea somehow found the will to fight against an enemy almost five times larger, and won. The other common thought is also the battle was won by the use of the longbow. This is not true. The victory went to the English because of French mistakes and the men who were holding the longbows.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Tudor Propaganda

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This indicates that Henry was able to win the battle thanks to his chosen location because it gave him an advantage over Richard as the marsh made his soldiers difficult to reach and see (due to the sun being blocked by Henry’s army) which in return would have made them difficult to attack. Vergil’s use of the adverb ‘deliberately’ rises a question over the reliability of the source as it indicates that Henry consciously made the decision to place his men on ‘the right side’ of the marsh suggesting that he was a skilled fighter who knew how best to use the available space cleverly. This implies that Vergil may have over exaggerated Henry’s field tactics in order to present him as strategic man as we know that Henry was an inexperienced fighter and was reliant on the Earl of Oxford to ‘command’. Furthermore, we know that Richard III – a more experienced fighter – was located at the top of Ambien Hill. This may have undermined the extent to which Henry’s location played to his advantage because…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harold and his army had just finished fighting at Stamford Bridge, his soldiers were tired and wounded but Harold made his army march to Hastings which meant his army had no chance to recover. Even though Harold belived that his army could put all their effort into it. Also one of Harold's mistakes was whilst holding the shield wall together William's army ran toward Harold's. The right side of William's army turned around and ran away. After the shield wall broke, Harold's army ran straight ahead after them. The Normans split up into two columns then closed on Harold's army. This could be known as an envelopment.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays