Preview

Why Was Hag Called The Butcher Of The Somme

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Hag Called The Butcher Of The Somme
General Douglas Haig was the general of the army and he had a really important role to play. His role was to command the army; however, his plans didn’t turn out to be a success because there were so many deaths. This was in the Battle of the Somme.
The Battle of the Somme was on July 1st 1916 – November 18th 1916. This battle had started as Germany had attacked France in Verdun and France was losing. This then meant that they had to call one of their allies and the only near friend was Britain. They called Britain and the British soldiers was at the River of the Somme, Britain were also the distraction for France. As Britain were at the River of the Somme Germany had sent most of their soldiers there, this had then led to the Battle of the
…show more content…
General Douglas Haig can’t be blamed for all the lives lost because they weren’t trained and it was the public people that had put their names forwards to fight for the country. General Douglas Haig didn’t make the Germans divert and come towards the British army so Haig can’t be blamed for doing something that he hasn’t even done. A major reason is that the weather was bad so the British army couldn’t do anything as it’s a natural cause. Haig had also learnt from his mistakes as Haig had changed the plans after he knew that they were losing the war. Another reason is that the British army were making all the decisions on the no-man land so the soldiers knew what they were doing instead of the soldiers sending someone to Haig to make the decisions. If the soldiers had sent many of their men to General Douglas Haig, then they would’ve lost so many lives. The British army had changed the tactics and the soldiers had used a technique called the creeping barrage. The creeping barrage is used when you throw a bomb and you can quickly move in the smoke so the opponent can’t see you. The creeping barrage had worked really well as the Germans were dying and the British soldiers could actually make their way to the other side of the no-man lands without losing many …show more content…
Another reason is that Britain were losing the war and they had more deaths than Germany in the first couple of days. Also, this first day of the war was also known as Britain’s bloodiest day in history as on that day the most British men had died out of any other war Britain had ever been in. another reason is that the British army attacked Thiepval twice and they failed, the soldiers were then told to go and attack the same place again by Morlan and General Douglas Haig. This proves that General Douglas Haig is ‘the Butcher of the Somme’, because many young men fought in the war to save the country and they had lost their lives. However, it still doesn’t mean that General Douglas Haig is ‘the Butcher of the Somme’, because the young men had volunteered, Haig didn’t force them to fight they wanted to with their own will. Also, despite the British army having lost many of the soldiers in the first day they had won the war with less British men as Germany had more deaths. At the end of the war the British army had lost 432,000 men over the 4 months the soldiers fought for the country and Germany had lost 500,000 over the 4 months that the soldiers had fought for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source B3 was written by Fred Pearson, a private on the Western Front, writing a letter to a local newspaper in 1966. He said “The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig” describing how he stupidly sent soldiers to die, in the source he says how Haig “lived almost 50km behind the line” in the source with this quote he basically described Haig as a coward who didn’t know what the trenches were like. Source B2 is reliable because of the fact that it was written by a Private who was at the Somme during the battle, so in that respect he had a firsthand view of the battlefield. However the Source is also not reliable because of the fact that it was written 50 years after the Somme so the author could have forgotten some of the details, on top of that the fact that he wrote it for a newspaper so he could have over-exaggerated to get his story published.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of The Bulge was one of the infamous battles fought between the allies and germany during WW2. It was an attack that Hitler launched in a last effort attempt to break up the allied alliance. It took place on December 16, 1944 on the Western sector of Europe. Some of the groups and people involved were the allied powers, Hitler, Lieutenant - Colonel Joachiem Pieper, Sepp Dietrich, Manteuffel, and Brandenberger. It impacted the war because of the fact that it was such a big loss for Germany and was also the largest battle that the Americans fought in at the time. It impacted soldiers by causing many casualties for both side, especially the german side which suffered 100,000 casualties. Majority of the soldiers had to deal with extremely…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A direct witness Fred Pearson, who was a private on the Western Front , holds a letter to a local newspaper during 1966 (Source B3). He says in the letter “The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig” this quote supports the view of British generals being incompetent. Debates still rage about Haigs tactics at the Battle of the Somme, when 20,000 men were killed on the first day alone. He also talks about his wrong decisions where he…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source B is written by a sergeant in the British army and it supports the statement and it is reliable since it is neither written by Haig himself to avoid blame for the Battle of the Somme, nor by someone who wasn’t at the battle. Source B gives us a first person view of the battle as Sergeant Cook was there…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    history dunkirk coursework

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    May 1940. Germany had attacked France, Belgium and Holland. Within six weeks all three countries had surrendered. Germany’s success lay at the feet of a new and successful war technique: Blitzkrieg. This was the fast and overwhelmingly successful invasion of a country using tanks, air craft, artillery and infantry all working together communicating by7 radio. The BEF (British Expeditionary Force) was sent to help in France in 1939 at the start of the war, but was caught up in disaster, retreating from the German Front back to France and eventually the beaches of Dunkirk. On the 27th of May Winston Churchill (PM) ordered the Royal Navy to retrieve and evacuate as many of the BEF as they could. For seven days the British soldiers waited on the beaches of Dunkirk. It was believed only 30,000 would return. However thanks to small boats from the British public, by June 4th Navy was able to rescue nearly 338,000 men. It was described as “A miracle of deliverance” By Churchill himself. These men would be core in the army for the next five years and help to win the war. Without them all would have been lost. Therefore the evacuation itself could be argued a triumph. However as Churchill said “wars are not won by retreats no matter how glorious” and the amount of equipment and men left behind was enormous. And for those reasons it has been argued either side since 1940. In this essay I’ll be evaluating sources that support the interpretation that Dunkirk was a triumph and sources that contradict that statement. First of all sources that support this interpretation.…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Somme offensive was launched on July 1st, 1916, and…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though they won in the long run, the first day of the Battle of Somme was a major defeat for the British. Over 57,000 British soldiers died on the first day. According to George Coppard, hundreds of his fellow soldiers lay dead the morning after the attack. Many were caught in the barbed wire of the Germans trenches, leaving few survivors (Document B). The skillful thinking of the Germans saved them from facing a loss as grand as Britains.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 is an extract from Sir Douglas Haig’s final dispatch, published in March 1919. This source begins to describe the Battle of the Somme as a tremendous victory. Haig claims that “The three main objectives… had been achieved.” Haig also then begins to describe the three objectives, “Verdun had been relieved…”, “German forces had been held down…” and “the enemy’s strength had been considerably worn down”. Haig also claims that as the objectives had been “achieved” this was enough to “…justify the Somme Battle.” This source was published shortly after the war in 1919, but was a few years after the Battle of the Somme allowing some time for the truth about the events of the battle to emerge. The source has some limitations as it was an extract from Haig’s own writing, who was Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces therefore the source may be bias towards Britain and their success in the battle. The purpose of the source was to inform people of Haig’s perception of the battle and due to this being one person’s view, the accuracy of the source cannot be verified.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the loss of vital lives came the massive losses of equipment. Overall, nearly 40,000 pieces of equipment were ‘surrendered’ to the enemy, including 17,000 machine guns, 12,000 field guns, 2,800 anti-aircraft guns and 475 tanks. This was one of the worst losses of equipment ever sustained by the British military. These are obscene numbers of equipment lost, and…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of Cambrai (November 20th- December 4th 1917). It was fought in Cambrari, France. It was the British against the Germans. The significance of the battle was that it was the first battle that actually used tanks…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another reason I think that perhaps Haig does not deserve the title ‘Butcher of the Somme’ because he had untrained men and they weren’t used to fighting which made them very vulnerable to the experienced German soldiers. We often think about Haig relaxed with his feet up while his men were fighting and dying. However Haig was under enormous pressure.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Vimy Ridge

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Farr, Don. Silent General: Horne of the First Army : a Biography of Haig 's Trusted Great War Comrade-in-arms. Solihull, England: Helion &, 2007.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, Source B is written through the perspective of the British. General Haig was a man of high power and rank as he was the commander of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) during WWI. This would influence his point of view about the battle of the Somme in reports such as Source B. The battle of the Somme was a British…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of the Somme in 1916 was start of the turning point in British people’s attitudes towards the war effort as the reality of modern warfare was revealed. Britain and its allies lost over 600, 000 men for only 32km of territory, it was one of the bloodiest battle of the WW1. A drop in enlistment came soon after the movie ‘The Battle of the Somme’ was released as people questioned Haig’s tactics in the war after the British army was decimated. However, the zeppelin raids carried out on coastal cities and London in 1915 and 1916 dropped morale as the war was seen to be brought back to the home front. Britain was unexpectedly attacked for the first time in May 1915 by zeppelins, killing 9 people yet over the 2 years 52 zeppelin attacks claimed the life’s of over 500 people.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the failure and lives lost were not entirely Churchill's fault, he was heavily involved in the planning, and its approval by a War Council of five leading military figures was likely due to his domineering personality and enthusiasm, which caused him to control the planning and execution of the attack, and once in that situation, you accept all the glory or all the…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays