Preview

Why Was Henry Viii Important

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
180 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Henry Viii Important
Henry VIII was an extremely vain king. He was so convinced that he was all powerful and the most handsome. In June of 1520 Henry VIII had an infamous meeting with Francis I of France. The meeting took place over the course of two weeks on a piece of land dubbed The Field of Cloth of Gold. The meeting was meant to bring friendship between Henry and Francis but was really nothing more than a boasting match. Henry went to extreme lengths to impress Francis and prove to be better than him. Henry went so far as to build a palace for Francis for his stay. The palace was covered in Tudor colors and gold cloth. Henry did all he could to outshine Francis. At one point during a least Henry challenged Francis to a wrestling match. They got up from their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?

    How far was Henry VII’s control over the nobility in the years 1485 to 1509 due to his…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Limiting the Power of the Nobility?
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Limiting the Power of the Nobility?

    Henry VII was very keen to limit the power of his nobility because he saw the great and powerful nobles as dangerous, he thought that if they had a big enough army they could rise up against him and over throw him, this was a constant worry to Henry as he had risen up and usurped the throne himself. Therefore to avoid the possible danger he tried his very best to limit the power which the nobility had. One way in which he attempted to do this was to keep the nobility to a very small number, this was a successful method as it made it very easy for Henry to keep a close eye on each one and their families to make sure they wasn’t planning any revolts which could affect Henry and his hold on the throne. The tight grip allowed Henry to give clear instructions and to make sure they stayed in order and loyal however due to the huge cut in nobles local areas began to suffer due to the fact there was no one there to keep them in order, this led to a breakdown in laws over different towns.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How successful were Henry VIII's aims 1509-1514?
    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How successful were Henry VIII's aims 1509-1514?

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?
    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?

    It might be inferred that Henry was less than impressive as he was clearly insecure. Source two shows Henry seeking to compare favourability with his rival king Francis I of France. He persistently asks the Venetian ambassador whether he is more physically impressive than Francis e.g. Henry asks ‘what sort of legs has he got?’ Such insecurity might encourage challenges as Henry could be seen as unconfident about his own authority. This argument could gain weight from the fact that the ambassador would be seeking to provide accurate information to the government of Venice. It could however be seen as the only one incident by a king who had only been on the throne for six years. Also it is not sustained in the other two sources.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Henry VII Influence His Government
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Henry VII Influence His Government

    The household staff rose beyond mere servitude: Henry eschewed public appearances, therefore, staff members were the few persons Henry saw on a regular basis. He created the Committee of the Privy Council ,a forerunner of the modern cabinet) as an executive advisory board; he established the Court of the Star Chamber to increase royal involvement in civil and criminal cases; and as an alternative to a revenue tax disbursement from Parliament, he imposed forced loans and grants on the nobility. Henry's mistrust of the nobility derived from his experiences in the Wars of the Roses - a majority remained dangerously neutral until the very end. His skill at by-passing Parliament (and thus, the will of the nobility) played a crucial role in his success at renovating…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?

    Henry VII took the throne after a battle against the former king Richard III whose forces outnumbered Henrys by two to one. Henry VII had a couple of big problems, one of them was that there were people that had a stronger claim to the throne than he did, his only claim was that god let him win the battle, therefore the nobility didn’t respect him at the beginning of his reign. Another of the problems he faced was the fact that he feared a lot about his security and about his son, and in order to keep his family and himself safe, he signed treaties with other countries so they didn’t attack each other because Henry, not being a conventional king, preferred peace than war.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure

    Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor. Instead, the 20 year old French successor, Francis I invaded northern Italy and recaptured Milan from the Habsburgs. Francis, like Henry, wanted to be the centre of attention and he could afford to. Another person who made Henry look weaker, was Charles V who became the King of Spain, The Holy Roman Emperor and the Duke in the Netherlands, he was the ultimate ruler, whereas Henry lacked great titles so couldn't compete and couldn't improve his ‘warrior…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt
    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Patrick Henry Important
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was Patrick Henry Important

    Patrick Henry was one of the leading figures in the American Revolutionary time period and left an impact in later years. An outspoken opponent of the Stamp and Townshend Acts imposed by England, he stirred the conflict with his famous “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” speech and although he opposed the formation of the U.S. Constitution as a threat to the liberties and rights of the individual states, his criticisms helped bring upon the amendments that are known as the Bill of Rights.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was Henry Viii Important
    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Was Henry Viii Important

    Henry VIII, the determined Tudor king, pursued an ambitious foreign policy with the goal of making England a powerful force in Europe. He aimed to challenge the French through an active foreign policy, gain recognition and prestige, establish trade connections with the Netherlands, act as a respectable statesman and mediator, and solidify his dynasty by strategically marrying into Scottish and Irish families to gain control over their territories. Henry VIII’s first major impact as a statesman and peacemaker was on the negotiations and finalization of the Treaty of London in 1518. Henry actively took part in the negotiations, aiming to improve diplomatic relations and prevent conflicts between the major European powers. Unfortunately, despite…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory
    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Successful Were Henry Vii's Attempts to Control His Nobility
    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Successful Were Henry Vii's Attempts to Control His Nobility

    Lotherington says, ‘No king could rule without the co-operation of the nobility, which was largely responsible for conducting the king’s business in the provinces’ and Pendrill supports this when he says that Henry VII’s prime aim was to restore a partnership in government, shifting the balance in his favour after the disruption of the Wars of the Roses. Policies to achieve this combined a mix of the ‘carrot and stick’ technique. The ‘stick’ approach combined military and financial restraints and a reduction in central and local power. Whereas the ‘carrot,’ approach saw Henry develop a reward system for service and encouraging loyalty from his peers. However the question remains, how did Henry do when meeting the nobles. Are we to believe Pendrill who claims, ‘Henry’s relationship with his nobility was, ultimately a failure.’ Or are we to follow Guy’s line who claims, ‘by means of bonds, Henry VII in effect disabled his nobility.’…

    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics