Preview

Why Was Henry Viii Important

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
180 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Henry Viii Important
Henry VIII was an extremely vain king. He was so convinced that he was all powerful and the most handsome. In June of 1520 Henry VIII had an infamous meeting with Francis I of France. The meeting took place over the course of two weeks on a piece of land dubbed The Field of Cloth of Gold. The meeting was meant to bring friendship between Henry and Francis but was really nothing more than a boasting match. Henry went to extreme lengths to impress Francis and prove to be better than him. Henry went so far as to build a palace for Francis for his stay. The palace was covered in Tudor colors and gold cloth. Henry did all he could to outshine Francis. At one point during a least Henry challenged Francis to a wrestling match. They got up from their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?

    Henry had a very detailed and complex financial policy which enabled him to milk every penny he could from his Nobility or in fact avoid having to pay them all together. A prime example would be Henry's reluctance to grant titles and land as rewards, instead he preferred to award the ancient honour of the Order of the Garter. This significantly decreased the amount Henry had to pay out to his Nobles but it also kept them satisfied as it was such a prestigious award. Henry also used Bonds and Recognisances to restrain the power of his Nobility. Lord Burgavenny, for example, was fined £70,650 for the breach of such a Recognisance. This obviously contain the power of over mighty Nobles as it was estimated that between the years 1504-1508, Edmund Dudley collected £50,000 per annum from bonds. Such methods aided with controlling Nobility but there were other financial policies that contributed.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Limiting the Power of the Nobility?
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Limiting the Power of the Nobility?

    Henry VII was very keen to limit the power of his nobility because he saw the great and powerful nobles as dangerous, he thought that if they had a big enough army they could rise up against him and over throw him, this was a constant worry to Henry as he had risen up and usurped the throne himself. Therefore to avoid the possible danger he tried his very best to limit the power which the nobility had. One way in which he attempted to do this was to keep the nobility to a very small number, this was a successful method as it made it very easy for Henry to keep a close eye on each one and their families to make sure they wasn’t planning any revolts which could affect Henry and his hold on the throne. The tight grip allowed Henry to give clear instructions and to make sure they stayed in order and loyal however due to the huge cut in nobles local areas began to suffer due to the fact there was no one there to keep them in order, this led to a breakdown in laws over different towns.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How successful were Henry VIII's aims 1509-1514?
    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How successful were Henry VIII's aims 1509-1514?

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?
    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?

    It might be inferred that Henry was less than impressive as he was clearly insecure. Source two shows Henry seeking to compare favourability with his rival king Francis I of France. He persistently asks the Venetian ambassador whether he is more physically impressive than Francis e.g. Henry asks ‘what sort of legs has he got?’ Such insecurity might encourage challenges as Henry could be seen as unconfident about his own authority. This argument could gain weight from the fact that the ambassador would be seeking to provide accurate information to the government of Venice. It could however be seen as the only one incident by a king who had only been on the throne for six years. Also it is not sustained in the other two sources.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Henry VII Influence His Government
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Henry VII Influence His Government

    The household staff rose beyond mere servitude: Henry eschewed public appearances, therefore, staff members were the few persons Henry saw on a regular basis. He created the Committee of the Privy Council ,a forerunner of the modern cabinet) as an executive advisory board; he established the Court of the Star Chamber to increase royal involvement in civil and criminal cases; and as an alternative to a revenue tax disbursement from Parliament, he imposed forced loans and grants on the nobility. Henry's mistrust of the nobility derived from his experiences in the Wars of the Roses - a majority remained dangerously neutral until the very end. His skill at by-passing Parliament (and thus, the will of the nobility) played a crucial role in his success at renovating…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?

    During this essay the questions that will be discussed will be ‘Was this a new monarchy? and ‘Was Henry VII and innovator? But as said before, his biggest problem was money.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure

    Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor. Instead, the 20 year old French successor, Francis I invaded northern Italy and recaptured Milan from the Habsburgs. Francis, like Henry, wanted to be the centre of attention and he could afford to. Another person who made Henry look weaker, was Charles V who became the King of Spain, The Holy Roman Emperor and the Duke in the Netherlands, he was the ultimate ruler, whereas Henry lacked great titles so couldn't compete and couldn't improve his ‘warrior…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt
    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Patrick Henry Important
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was Patrick Henry Important

    Patrick Henry was one of the leading figures in the American Revolutionary time period and left an impact in later years. An outspoken opponent of the Stamp and Townshend Acts imposed by England, he stirred the conflict with his famous “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” speech and although he opposed the formation of the U.S. Constitution as a threat to the liberties and rights of the individual states, his criticisms helped bring upon the amendments that are known as the Bill of Rights.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    He increased the amount of warships in the Royal Navy from 5 to over 40 and constructed fortifications on the southern coast. Through these efforts, Henry earned the title as the “Father of the English Navy”.Despite frivolous spending on war and luxuries, the dissolution of monasteries brought wealth to England. It pleased the Protestants and furthered the dissolution of Catholicism from the Church of England.Among Henry’s political accomplishments was his granting as Lord of Ireland, as well as the Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 which brought Wales into the English Kingdom. These successes point towards Henry increasing the rule of England over neighboring territories. Henry VIII was certainly not the nicest king in England’s history, but many of his goals were accomplished how he wanted them to be. He obtained his male heir, obtained the necessary power to end his marriages, built drastically upon the Royal Navy, and was awarded numerous titles. In the question of success, not everything has to be completely moral to expect a successful reign. While England was sure to see more tough times ahead, it was certainly not broken or completely exhausted of resources when Henry…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was Henry Viii Important
    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Was Henry Viii Important

    Henry VIII, the determined Tudor king, pursued an ambitious foreign policy with the goal of making England a powerful force in Europe. He aimed to challenge the French through an active foreign policy, gain recognition and prestige, establish trade connections with the Netherlands, act as a respectable statesman and mediator, and solidify his dynasty by strategically marrying into Scottish and Irish families to gain control over their territories. Henry VIII’s first major impact as a statesman and peacemaker was on the negotiations and finalization of the Treaty of London in 1518. Henry actively took part in the negotiations, aiming to improve diplomatic relations and prevent conflicts between the major European powers. Unfortunately, despite…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory
    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Successful Were Henry Vii's Attempts to Control His Nobility
    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Successful Were Henry Vii's Attempts to Control His Nobility

    Lotherington says, ‘No king could rule without the co-operation of the nobility, which was largely responsible for conducting the king’s business in the provinces’ and Pendrill supports this when he says that Henry VII’s prime aim was to restore a partnership in government, shifting the balance in his favour after the disruption of the Wars of the Roses. Policies to achieve this combined a mix of the ‘carrot and stick’ technique. The ‘stick’ approach combined military and financial restraints and a reduction in central and local power. Whereas the ‘carrot,’ approach saw Henry develop a reward system for service and encouraging loyalty from his peers. However the question remains, how did Henry do when meeting the nobles. Are we to believe Pendrill who claims, ‘Henry’s relationship with his nobility was, ultimately a failure.’ Or are we to follow Guy’s line who claims, ‘by means of bonds, Henry VII in effect disabled his nobility.’…

    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics