Preview

Why Was Nicholas II Guilty Of Crimes Against The Russian People

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Nicholas II Guilty Of Crimes Against The Russian People
I think that Nicholas II is guilty of crimes against the Russian people. Nicholas II was ruler of Russia from 1886 to 1916. He was born May 18th, 1868 and died July 17th, 1918. Nicholas married Alexandra Feodorovna on November 26, 1894. They had 5 children, 4 girls and 1 boy. The four daughters were Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, Maria and Alexia was the son.I feel that the prosecution team did an excellent job of proving that Nicholas II is guilty of crimes against the Russian people. They provided good evidence and used there witnesses to their advantage. The Russian soldier, the factory worker, the peasant, and Nicholas II himself will prove he is guilty. These witnesses went through their lives going through bad experiences some can say because of Nicholas. Being a factory worker was tough during Nicholas II reign. The factory workers in this time period worked under awful conditions. It was torture what they had to do …show more content…
Nicholas II started a very unnecessary war with Japan which was a huge mistake that he made. The Tsar made plans to seize control of Constantinople and expanded into Manchuria and Korea. Japan did not like this. As he did this Japan felt threatened by his action and on February 8th, 1904 the Japanese navy surprised attacked on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur. As this point the Russian army was not in a very good place to be. Also, when World War 1 started the the Russian army was not properly supplied. By December 1914 the Russian army had 6,553,000 troops; however they only had 4,652,000 rifles. Untrained troops were forced into battle without rifles and ammunition. According to spartacus-educational.com, the army had about one surgeon every 10,000 men. Many soldiers would die from wounds that could be treated, but there was nobody to treat them. These men were sitting ducks waiting for a fellow soldier to fall just to pick up their gun to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Czar Nicholas's Rule In Russia
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Successful Was Czar Nicholas's Rule In Russia

    Under Czar Nicholas’s rule in World War 1, there were 1,700,000 to 2,254,396 total military deaths and 410,000 civilian deaths. As the head of the Imperial Russian Army, each and every one of these deaths was blamed on Czar Nicholas, the Czar of Russia. The wrath of his people later led to the the Russian Revolution and the end of the Romanov dynasty. Czar Nicholas II was an autocratic and inefficient ruler, which caused political opposition, neglect, and internal rebellions.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Political Opposition to the Regime of Tsar Nicholas Ii Grew in Russia in the Years Before 1905.
    • 578 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Why Political Opposition to the Regime of Tsar Nicholas Ii Grew in Russia in the Years Before 1905.

    This War with Japan was largely of Russia’s own making and it was here in 1904 where Nicolas II faced his first major test in foreign affairs to see if he was really strong enough to be Tsar. Russia’s main aims in the War were to pursue an expansionist policy in the Far East and also the Tsar wanted to distract from their domestic troubles by rallying into a patriotic struggle. However the War proved to be disastrous for Russia’s military as they had seriously underestimated the strength of the Japanese. This conflict led to disaster as Russia was defeated. It also showed up the problems with Russia’s government and the Tsar, as the military commanders had not prepared effectively enough. It was…

    • 578 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Far Was Nicholas II Responsible For The Fall Of The Romanovs
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Far Was Nicholas II Responsible For The Fall Of The Romanovs

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the most important cause of the February 1917 revolution was the Great War
    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How far do you agree that the most important cause of the February 1917 revolution was the Great War

    The Great War was the main cause of the February 1917 Revolution. The Russian army suffered badly in the First World War due to a lack of equipment, inadequate training and poor leadership. The Tsar decided to take personal command of the army. As a result, he was blamed for the army's problems and defeats. World War I was a total disaster for Russia due to the Russian army suffering defeat after defeat at the hands of Germany. Cost of the war led to the economic collapse which then led to more anger and outrage, this shows that the Great War started a chain reaction of problems for Russia. Morale during this time was at an all-time low and soldiers and civilians alike were looking for someone to blame. In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal command of the army and left St. Petersburg and moved to army headquarters in Russian, Poland. Nicholas II may have believed that, by taking charge, his army would be inspired and would fight with renewed vigour, however this had the opposite effect. Unfortunately, the Tsar knew little about the command and organisation of large military forces, and the series of defeats and humiliations continued. The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there were massive shortages of ammunition, equipment, and medical supplies which led to possibly the largest asset Nicholas had, the army, to lose belief and faith in…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    It Was Defeat in War Which Was the Main Reason for the February Revolution. Do You Agree with This Statement?
    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It Was Defeat in War Which Was the Main Reason for the February Revolution. Do You Agree with This Statement?

    In 1914 Germany and Austria declared war on Russia and their allies Serbia. Despite the fact that in 1908 Tsar Nicholas II had put into action ‘The Grand Military Programme’, aiming to rearm his forces and get Russia ready for war, the plan was set to finish in 1917, not three years earlier. Nevertheless, Russia went into war with its head held high, with full support and enthusiasm from the Russian people. By 1916 however, this support for the war had changed dramatically, as the fighting at the front had lived up to nobody’s expectations. Russia was now occupied by the enemy, proving the weakness of the Russian’s defence and the strength of the enemy. On the front line one out of three men had a rifle, due to the lack of weapons and supplies the incomplete military programme had been able to offer. The number of casualties, missing in action and death toll was catastrophic: 4 million by the end of 1915. Evidently moral of the men fighting was almost at breaking point, it was clear Russia was losing a battle they did not even want to fight. Another affecting factor on the front line was the fact that most of the…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Role Of Nicholas II In The Downfall Of The Romanov Dynasty
    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Role Of Nicholas II In The Downfall Of The Romanov Dynasty

    Assess the role of Nicholas II in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Factors Leading to Russia’s Poor Performance in WW1
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Factors Leading to Russia’s Poor Performance in WW1

    Russia’s poor performance in the war was an extremely important factor because it led to the Tsar becoming more unpopular. At the beginning of the war, there was a strong sense of patriotisms in Russia due to the excellent war performance. The decline in Russia’s war performance caused morale in the army and country to decrease. The situation of the war was made worse by the fact that in September 1915 after the Russians lost battles to the Germans (Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes); the Tsar took personal control of the army and dismissed his uncle, the Grand Duke Nikolai. As a result the performance of the army could be blamed directly on the Tsar himself.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

    Nicholas I faced a multitude of problems when he ascended to the throne in 1825, first and foremost of all these was the Decembrist Revolution by Russian officers. Second was Russia’s crippling economic backwardness, and the slowly crumbling social systems of the old autocracy. Due to Nicholas the I Slavophil outlook on economics he had all but refused to modernise the Russian economy instead leaving it to sit stagnant whilst Western economies of Britain and France thundered ahead. This neglect of industry was keenly felt during the Crimean War where the allied forces of Britain and France thoroughly defeated and embarrassed the Tsars armies. The Russian army was terribly equipped, only capable of supplying 50%…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

    At the front line the men only had three bullets and one rifle between two people and if every one ran out of bullets they would charge with bayonets and cavalry with sabers (a type of gun) this was one of their main tactics which they mainly trained and practice. There was also limited food, water and warmth, lots of people die of hunger and froze to death on the way to the battle and were too weak to fight when they arrived. In May 1915 Germany attacked Poland wiping out just under half of Russia's army, 1400 000 were kill in battle or got wounded and 976 000 were caught and became prisoners. The Germans had better attack and defense, they had bigger and deeper trenches and longer rang weaponry, and they had more ammo and could hold their position better. The Germans squads had twice as many guns and three times as much ammo as the Russian squads, their guns just mowed down the Russians like nothing. The main problem with the army was the transport, since Russia is so big it's hard to get troops, weapons, ammo, and food + water around to everyone. There was only two main train tracks running straight through the middle of Russia this made it hard to defend all around. All of this was blamed on the Tsar and because he was leading the army he was blamed for the massive defeat and the poor tactics. The State…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Czar Nicholas II Impact
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Czar Nicholas II Impact

    Czar Nicholas II, also known as Nikolai Aleksandrovich Romanov, was born on 18 May 1868. Czar Alexander III, Nicholas’s father, died with kidney diseased at the age of 49, and Nicholas II “succeeded his father in 1894” (NicholasII BBC). Czar Nicholas II was neither trained nor ready to rule Russia. Even though as kid, he had private tutors, his father did not inform or teach him…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peasants in Russia
    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peasants in Russia

    Nicholas II continued his father’s economic policies, creating more regular and better paid work for those employed in industry. He introduced factory inspectors and, by 1917, the average working day had been reduced to eight hours. Better education was also introduced for the children of workers. However, urban living conditions got worse and little was done to solve the problem of the spread of disease. Workers either lived in overcrowded blocks of flats or barracks. The average flat housed 16 people and only about 30 per cent of the houses in the main cities had…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fall of the Romanov Dynasty
    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    1905 was a bad year for Nicholas’ popularity. In August of 1905, they where defeated in their war with Japan. With this resounding loss, the people of Russia saw the navy’s weakness as an overall representation of Russian weakness. They pushed harder in their search for reform.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

    The war had an adverse effect on the Russian economy. The rising cost of food caused food shortages. Industrial workers went on strike to increase wages and by the end of the war and a new government emerged following Nicholas II abdication. The already delicate domestic political situation in Russia would be imperiled by Nicholas II’s personal affiliation with the military wealth of his country. Any other military commander could be blamed for a disaster and then dismissed, but by taking personal command the Emperor would now take personal as well as political responsibility for all military failures. The crumbling of the Russian position in the field after he assumed command made such an outcome inevitable regardless of innumerable…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why did Tsar Nicholas II fall from power in 1917?
    • 1998 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why did Tsar Nicholas II fall from power in 1917?

    Tsar Nicholas was an autocratic ruler who believed in divine right meaning he believed he was God’s representative on Earth, chosen by God to be Tsar; however, he was incompetent and refused to listen. In source 11, Nicholas states ‘I am not prepared to be tsar’ contradicting his belief in divine right and showing he wasn’t ready to be tsar. Nicholas’ military training instead of training to rule may explain his lack of readiness to become tsar. This statement backs up Nicholas’ incompetence as even he knew he wasn’t fit to rule. In the same source, he says ‘I never wanted to become one’ (become Tsar). Nicholas preferred to spend time with his family rather than ruling the country, shown when he says he didn’t want to be Tsar. Source 13 shows the Tsar wouldn’t listen, as the Okrahna, his secret police, sent a report to Nicholas saying ‘the workers here are on the verge of despair’ but he does nothing about it.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    An Example Of Nationalism In The Late 19th Century
    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Example Of Nationalism In The Late 19th Century

    The war was centered around Russia and Japan’s dispute over control of Manchuria and Korea. When Japan inquired about taking control over Manchuria and keeping their current control of Korea since it was apprehensive of Russia’s growing power in the region. Russia declined this offer, and after several negotiation attempts, Japan decided it was time to go to war. The Tzar of Russia at the time, Nicholas II, was convinced by his advisors that Japan would never attempt a military assault, so they were completely blindsided by Japan’s surprise attack on Port Arthur in February of 1904. This attack was quite successful for the Japanese, as only two Japanese ships were damaged while nearly all of the Russian ships were destroyed, with only one making it to another port.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics