Preview

Why Was Richard Whiting Killed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Richard Whiting Killed
On 15 November 1539 Richard Whiting was dragged through the streets of Glastonbury on a hurdle by Henrys soldiers. He was brought to the top the Glastonbury Torr. He was hung there until the executer thought he was almost dead but not fully. Then he was let off the rope and while he was still alive the executer cut his guts out in front of him. Followed by his heart and just to make sure he was dead they cut his head off and put it on a spike on Glastonbury Abbey. His body was quartered then each part was sent to 4 different towns Bath, Wells, Ilchester and Bridgewater.

To explain why Richard Whiting was killed we can start with the problems of Henry VIII. Henry needed money; he was bankrupt fighting expensive wars. He needed money to be powerful in Europe and to continue his campaigns.
Another problem Henry had was he wanted a son but his wife Catherine of Aragon had given him a daughter. Catherine couldn’t give birth to another baby, so Henry had to get a divorce which the Pope had to approve of. Then he needed a new wife.
His final problem was he wanted power. Henry wanted to control the Church in his own country so everyone will have to obey him.

Henry VII gave the job of closing down the monasteries to Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell got the monasteries closed down by sending out hand-picked inspectors to inspect the monasteries and to find something wrong with every monastery. If the inspector brings back a good review then
Thomas would send it back demanding the inspectors to find something bad about the monastery. The inspectors didn’t visit every monastery they sometimes just asked other people nearby what it was like.
These reports gave Henry what he needed to get rid off all the monasteries.

By the summer of 1539 Glastonbury was one of the few remaining monasteries in England. The monasteries were starting to resist such as Hexham in Northumberland where the monks barred the gate and prepared to resist the commissioning by force.
When the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some historians claim that the Pilgrimage of Grace was not a great threat to Henry as it was controlled promptly and efficiently but the rebellion would have been more serious had the Pope intervened. Cardinal Pole a leading member of the York family was instructed to organise an invasion however, before he could act the rebellion was over. Henry still took advantage of his power and executed other senior members of the Pole family, including elderly matriarch, the Countess of Salisbury. The strained relationship between the Pope and Henry within the past few years caused by ‘The Great Matter’ of Henry’s divorce and the more recent matter of the dissolution of the monasteries was more than likely to encourage the Pope’s decision to attempt to take part in the rebellion.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cardinal Wolsey, who was in charge of securing and annulment, was dismissed in shame when he failed to do so. Thomas Cranmer and Thomas Cromwell, both of whom harbored Lutheran sympathies then became Henry’s most trusted advisors. They wanted to create an English church of which the King would be the head. This allowed Henry to annul his own marriage.…

    • 3911 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1539 found the post-Reformation England in a delicate situation, facing the imminent peril of an allied invasion on religious grounds from both France and the Holy Roman Empire. One can refer to the English territory as to “a bone between two dogs”, this making Henry VIII a vulnerable monarch, isolated from the Roman Catholic states and lacking allies in Europe. As stated by D. Loades in “Henry VIII: Church, Court and Conflict”, “Henry remained apprehensive and when Francis and Charles signed a peace treaty at Toledo on 12 January 1539 he became almost paranoid.”…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly the death of Richard at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 was the final contributing factor to his demise, but it had certainly been brought about by Henry Tudor’s efforts and was undoubtedly not an event of simply sheer fortune for Tudor. It is the act of Richard breaking rank in a seemingly desperate final drive for victory that many site as the reason for the succession of Henry Tudor, though it is the events prior to this that determine whether Richard was left with no other choice.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was also very annoyed at Wolsey his adviser at the time for not being able to get him a divorce so he fired him and had him beheaded but he died on the way to execution.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite this being the main reason, it is true that Wolsey’s unpopularity was a factor that contributed as well, his many enemies at court provided reasons for Henry to remove him but Henry didn’t get rid of his straight away because Wolsey was able to do what he asked. However, when he failed, Henry took into consideration these enemies (especially the Duke of Norfolk because of his family ties with Anne Boleyn.) and his failures with gaining the nobilities favour. Therefore Wolsey’s ultimate downfall was the failure of not securing an annulment, but his unpopularity and minor failures such as the subsidies were contributing factors to the most important reasons of why he eventually fell from…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greed may have affected Henrys decision to overpower the church as Henry was slowly, but surely running out of money,. If Henry controlled the church he would control the amount of taxes and tithes people had to pay, and if he controlled the church Henry could shut down all the monasteries (which he did in a period called `The Dissolution of the Monasteries 1535’) and take all the money and goods from them. Greed was very…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catherine, understandably, was opposed to be divorced from Henry and tried her upmost to prevent the marriage being ended. Henry believed it would be easy to get a divorce from his wife due to Wolsey’s contacts, as papal legate and cardinal. However when it became clear that Wolsey’s efforts weren’t materializing, growing pressure began to remove Wolsey from his position. Wolsey went to desperate measures to resolve the problem, even attempting to put Catherine in a nunnery. However when all of these attempts failed, it was a combination of this, the failure of the amicable grant along with other factors, such as Wolsey’s opposition at court that combined to caused Henry to dismiss him from his position as Lord…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To an extent, Opposition to the religious reforms by Henry VIII wasn’t overly serious, the opposition did have some potential to cause damage but the danger was never severe enough to undermine the Tudor dynasty or threaten the omnipotent once of the “Most Christian King”. Opposition was only as serious as the support it had, which is why The Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536 was the most dangerous form of opposition. Henry ensured that disapproval from his kingdom would never threaten to undermine the longevity of the Tudor dynasty by using Cromwell’s key weapon: The Treason Act of 1534. This allowed Henry to eradicate any opposition that had potential to threaten Henry. The religious changes came to a halt in 1540, where Henry sends out a strong deterrent message by executing the architect of the religious changes, Cromwell.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December 1483 the bodies of Prince Richard and Prince Henry, only 12 and 9, were found murdered in the Tower of London. The mystery of who killed the boys is still a mystery to this day, however many suspect their uncle Richard III of York. Many historians who recorded the event explicitly express that they’re certain Richard III is responsible, and there’s many valid reasons to support their assumption.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important however to remember that the pope had never had much direct political power in England. He had no army and no proper tax base therefore he could not invade except through an alliance with secular allies. Indeed he blocked Henry 's dispensation to divorce Catherine of Aragon, but a king who was less worried about his soul and his wife’s nephew, the emperor, invading would probably just have ignored his commands. The king had also always had lots of power over the church. Political partnerships between kings, their bishops and abbots had always been a feature of the church, and this war true throughout the period 1485-1529. Henry VII enjoyed a very close relationship with the church through Cardinal John Morton, who was not only Archbishop of Canterbury but enjoyed secular power too as Lord Chancellor. Bishop Richard Foxe was also important to Henry Tudor and these senior figures of the clergy helped Henry develop his tax policies, while at the same time, Benefit of Clergy and other privileges of the church were untouched by the king. This close relationship between church and crown continued for the first twenty years of Henry CIII’s reign, as demonstrated by his long reliance and trust for Cardinal…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Henry had six wives, which lead to the splitting of the catholic church. By marrying his six wives Henry was looking for a few thing. A male heir for the throne, Political…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believed that the monasteries were corrupt during 1536 and 1539. Thomas Cromwell sent out some chosen inspectors to report on the state of the monasteries. Source F has a report on St. Edmund’s monastery, in Suffolk, it says “The Abbot delighted much in playing at dice and in that spent much money.” This suggests that the Abbot at St. Edmund’s monastery was gambling. Source F also says that the same Abbot was “For his own pleasure he has had lots of beautiful buildings built.” this suggests that the Abbot was spending the money on unnecessary things. This is backed up by Source C, from ‘The Tudor Years’ by John Lotherington where it mentions that “The public reason for the Dissolution of the Monasteries was corruption and waste of resources.” which proves that some of the monasteries were spending their money on unnecessary things like extra buildings.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, Thomas Becket has been regarded as Chancellor, Archbishop of Canterbury, Martyr, and Saint. He was a friend of Henry II, and when Henry II became King, he appointed Thomas Becket as his chancellor in 1154. Eight years later, as Becket and Henry II’s relationship grew stronger, Henry II wanted to gain greater control over the English Church so he appointed his chancellor Becket to the position of Archbishop of Canterbury as well. Although Becket was reluctant at first, he accepted the position. However, soon after things started to turn sour.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, (between 1536 and 1540 ) King Henry VIII wanted more power and money, and since The Pope didn’t approve of Henry’s divorce, he made himself Head of the church. When in this position, he found proof that religious people were being sinful which gave him a reason to destroy monasteries, causing the ‘Dissolution of Monasteries’. After this had happened, the land in which the monasteries…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays