Preview

Why We Should Not Cause Unnecessary Pain And Suffering

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why We Should Not Cause Unnecessary Pain And Suffering
Premise 1: We should not cause unnecessary pain or suffering.

Support: To avoid causing unnecessary pain or suffering is an objective moral principle. Intentionally causing someone pain and suffering is an immoral act. An exception to this principle, is if it is for the greater good. If many people’s pain and suffering can be prevented by causing suffering for one person, then it would be a moral decision to allow one person to suffer for the betterment of many others. This exception doesn’t really apply to the situation of the prisoners rioting, as the prisoners are causing their own pain and suffering by rioting, however the exception holds true to objective morality.

Example: If you put a child in time out for sneaking cookies
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism
    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Biblical Worldview Syllabus
    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Biblical Worldview Syllabus

    Students need to be made aware of contemporary ethical issues and learn to evaluate them in light of scriptural truth. This course is designed to teach students how to apply a biblical worldview to selected ethical issues that they are likely to encounter…

    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ethical Issues Of Prolonging Death
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Ethical Issues Of Prolonging Death

    Death is an event, dying is a process. Modern medicine today works very hard to help people live longer and avoid that dreaded day when death comes. The healthcare system is prolonging life, but is it always the answer, forcing someone to continue a suffering life. Doctors sometimes unintentionally instill false hope in patients by offering treatment that most likely will not work or benefit the patient. Prolonging life has ethical and moral issues. Death is also a very taboo topic in our culture and should not be discussed or accepted. The doctors and pharmaceutical companies that are prolonging life do not fully understand the damage they are causing to society surrounding death.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killing and Letting Die
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Killing and Letting Die

    Philippa Foot’s calculated article entitled, ‘Killing and Letting Die’ is one which provides arguments through hypothetical situation’s, discrediting opinions and beliefs of other modern philosophers. Its main cause is to locate moral differentiation between the active taking of life versus allowing death to occur by means of not producing assistance. Afterwards Foot applies these beliefs onto the sub-topic of abortion, highlighting flawed examples of pro-abortion arguments she then counters these with her own strong outlooks. In this critical report I intend to analyse the relevance and application of Foot’s arguments highlighting both strengths and weaknesses in Foot’s judgements.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant and Mills on Capital Punishment
    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant and Mills on Capital Punishment

    Utilitarian’s view suffering as intrinsically bad, and only when the amount of suffering is outweighed by the amount of resulting benefit is suffering acceptable. Punishment involving suffering is a very complicated concept for utilitarian’s. With regards to crime the only justifiable punishment is a punishment that will in turn reduce crime. Utilitarian decisions are in a sense always a balancing act between total good and consequential harm. The same is true for deciding how to punish criminal offenders; one most determine whether the overall balance of pleasure is increased or decreased because of the form of punishment considered. In doing this a true utilitarian would have to a lot equal consideration to the suffering of all parties including the criminal offender.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Torture Ever Ok?
    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is Torture Ever Ok?

    As a I discussed in my third essay, there are many disputes between people on whether or not torture should ever be allowed. I am writing my opinion on this heated issue and explaining why torture should be allowed under extreme circumstances. Extreme instances that should allocate torture are: times of war, a terrorist attack, or high profile criminal activity. If lives are at stake in these circumstances than I believe torturing someone is permissible. Torturing can be a way of defending those people, but should be the last option. A lot of times in these scenarios there are no other options and torturing someone is the only way to get fast results before it is too late. I am a utilitarian thinker and I believe in the greatest good for the most people. If a lot of people 's lives are at stake in a situation and can be saved because of one criminal 's pain then torturing is the way to go. I believe that torture can be morally justified in many extreme circumstances and by regulating torture by law then it could benefit our society.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill: The Ethics Of Torture
    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill: The Ethics Of Torture

    Therefore, consequences are irrelevant if the torture is based on the moral duty and therefore torture would be ethical. The universal moral law only acts on your will if there is a moral consequence based on duty. If you can’t rationalize the ends to justify the means, then it’s wrong. Respect their autonomy. I base this on the information in the article and podcast that are part of the project resource. There is no moral principle in his way of thinking and states, emotions that are irrational. He doesn’t approve of emotions in correlation to human reactions. Emotions can cloud the…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    misery. Although assisted suicide permits Tim to avoid needless suffering, there are various disadvantages to choosing this route as well. Conflicting principles involved in the anti-PAS route are; nonmaleficence and fidelity. Nonmaleficence requires healthcare providers to avoid causing harm to a patient, including deliberate harm, risk of harm, and harm that occurs during the performance of beneficial acts.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Role Of Life After Death In Greek And Hebrew Culture
    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Role Of Life After Death In Greek And Hebrew Culture

    Just as universal as birth, death is an inevitable fate that has threatened mankind for their entire existence. Countless philosophers, authors, scholars, religions, and theorists have grappled with the greatly debated topic of the afterlife. N. J. Richardson eloquently described this struggles as the, “beliefs about what happened to a person at the point of death and afterwards were never fixed and always remained a subject for debate” (Adams). Contributing influential opinions on the afterlife, the Greek and Hebrew cultures have wrestled with many concepts in order to arrive at a rough understanding of their individual views of life after death. These two dominant cultures have what appears to be a drastically different stance upon the time…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killing vs. Letting Die
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Killing vs. Letting Die

    There's been quite a controversy in the topic of "killing" and "letting someone die". Just by the word "kill", many will say it's worse to kill a person, for example shooting them than allowing a person to die by say, not providing them with medicine. With this said, this just simply means that it it worse to harm a human being than letting harm happen to them. It's quite hard to weigh which is wrong or which is morally right. It really depends and varies on the situation we're talking about.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Compassion
    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ethics of Compassion

    To help explain the ethics of compassion I will be using reference from the Dalia Lama’s book Ethics for the New Millennium, more specifically chapter ten; The Need for Discernment, and chapter 5 The Supreme Emotion. I will also refer to Touching Peace, and the five mindfulness trainings. The Dalia Lama had so many strong points it was hard to find any criticisms in his philosophies. One thing that concerned me was how he recognizes people who kill and torture for pleasure. The other point he made that came across as weaker to me or somewhat questionable is that we are to question whether our motive is genuinely compassionate when considered in relation to the totality of all beings. As for the strong points keeping in mind that there is no substantial difference between us, we all share a common desire to be happy and avoid suffering. The second point he made that I think is very strong is that, when we lack discipline, eventually anxiety arises in our mind, and deep in our heart we come to feel a sense of disquiet.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ultilitarianism
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultilitarianism

    In utilitarianism, there are no actions that are intrinsically wrong. “The morality of an action always depends on its results.” If those results are optimfic then the action is morally right. With this logic, killing/torturing innocents wouldn't be immoral. Most would recoil at this ‘immorality’, but, remember, in utilitarianism “kindness that fails to be optimific is immoral.” I believe this to a certain degree in which that in my opinion some immoral actions can be moral in certain circumstance. Contrastly, I think kindness is moral in most…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Torture Wrong
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Is Torture Wrong

    Torture is the intentional inflicting of severe pain and suffering on people to punish or intimidate them so that they will extract information (Doing Ethics). Torture is morally wrong if it is unjustifiable or does not serve a purpose. On the other hand, to protect and secure our country from extremist and other terrorist, it can be morally justified. Keeping torture quiet with the public and out of world news is crucial. If it got out that the Americans were torturing assumed terrorists or enemies of the state for answers, it could cause great controversy. Although torture can be seen as unethical and unjustifiable, it is needed to protect…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torture and Ethics
    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture and Ethics

    Evans, R (2007) The Ethics of Torture, Human Rights and Human Welfare. Retrieved on 4-13-2013 from http://www.du.edu/korbel/hrhw/volumes/2007/evans-2007.pdf…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Netflix Case Questions 1

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Netflix Case Questions 1

    You need to use V-R-I-N framework to define Netflix’s competitive advantages. The framework should be reflected in your writing.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics