Preview

Why Won The Battle Of Hastings Against Harold Godwinson II?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1272 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Won The Battle Of Hastings Against Harold Godwinson II?
What would have happened if William the Conqueror has lost the in The Battle of Hastings against Harold Godwinson II? To begin with, lots of events may have not occurred or happened in history. Any event that is significant in history has a huge impact on outcomes later made. In this instance, if Harold Godwinson had won the the Battle of Hastings he would have stayed in power and William the Conqueror would not take over the throne.
Description of the Event
The Battle only began based on a promise not kept by Edward the Confessor in giving the throne over to William like he was supposed to. The promise was made in 1051 when Edward the Confessor had decided to give the throne over to William when time was due. Edward the Confessor’s distant
…show more content…
This battle caused a huge change in the environment and government policies. A major significance in this event was the amount of lives that were taken based on a petty battle. Up to at least 10,000 men were believed to have died in this battle, it is yet to be true since there is no leftover evidence of bodies buried. In my own opinion, the question I continue to ask myself is, Why was Harold Godwinson’s army so unprepared knowing William’s constant anger toward the fact he was not in power. Reasons why Harold was unprepared as because Duke William had attacked before they were properly ready. While in battle, some of his best fighters as died in the previous battle, The Battle of Stamford Bridge, and the rest of soldiers were tired from the battle and the journey south. While in battle, the English were holding it together but the Normans tricked the English by pretending of retreat back. The English followed behind, leading their strong position on a hill, but then Harold Godwinson had died. In the event of his death, his army grew weak and ended up losing the battle. In this battle though, William was extremely lucky and only truly won based on the trick he played on the English during the battle. When William conquered the Normans, he completely had begun a new policy. Though, William wasn't fully English he still brought his native tongue to the English court. Some forms of French would remain the …show more content…
Overall in this battle, William defeated Harold because of his luck, and that Harold was unprepared. The most important point in the Battle of Hastings was that William won the battle. He made a last-minute plan during the battle, a plan that resulted in the defeat of the English. And yet what if Harold hadn’t fallen for the trick? Or no Norman knight had doubted the presence of his leader? What if Harold hadn’t been killed? Where would they be as a country

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was an honor to fight for Duke William's right to be crowned King in the battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. The battle of Hastings was one of the most memorable and successful battles that I have ever participated in as a Norman soldier. The Duke of Normandy, William, prepared for the battle against the King of England, Harold, months in advance. It all started after the death of King Edward, the Confessor died the 5th of January 1066 without an official heir to the throne (BBC, 2011). The day after King Edwards death, Harold claimed the throne to be King Harold II of England, illegally. Once Duke William heard of this news, he set out to gather his army and seek the approval of the Pope to become England's next rightful King.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William did not know it yet, but by allowing this to happen he had already lost the battle before it began. All William had to do was put more guards…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final thing that caused Richard to lose the battle was his own solo assault on Tudor. It is believed that if Richard had…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    http://www.pbs.org/empires/napoleon/n_time/html/page_2.html# Click on date, then if you want more information click on the event (will take you to event-specific pages)…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A question such as this is not a straightforward answer; there are many arguments for and against his success with the Godwin's. The Godwin's power changed over time from when Godwin was bought up through power under the reign of Cnut right up until when Edward declared Harold to be the next king on his death bed. Edward needed to control the power of the Godwin's in order to keep his own power because if he did not control them they would overthrow him from the throne. He had to give them a certain amount of power by weighing up the balance of power between himself and the Godwin's very carefully. One factor is the Dover incident, and how he dealt with the Godwin's during and after the incident. He dealt with the family members individually: Godwin, Edith, Swegn, Harold and Tostig. One other factor is Edward sitting back and allowing Harold to look as if he is in control, but ultimately having control himself. These are the points that will decide the balance of the argument and question presented.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luck and timing were central to William’s success at Hastings. Firstly, in advance of the campaign, two of William’s rivals had died; Henry, king of France and Count Fulk of Anjou. This was very significant to the campaign because it enabled William to leave Normandy feeling safe because his two main adversaries were dead, and permitted him to get to Hastings without agonizing over an invasion and to dedicate his full thought to the campaign which lay ahead. When he did embark on the campaign, the weather was in the favour of the Normans. Initially, William had intended to embark in July but owing to adverse winds, the invasion was delayed from the end of July to September; first at the River Dives and then at St. Valery on the Somme. Additionally the Navy were no longer at seas as only remained on the Seas until the 8th September. With the amalgamation of clear seas and good weather on the 28th September, the day of crossing, The Saxons crossed the channel in just over 24 hours. Moreover, unbeknownst to William, this also was an extremely auspicious time for him because if he had arrived at his intended time of crossing in July, Harold and the Saxon army would have been waiting for him. However, it was a time of unease for Harold that year, as it was apparent that England was going to be invaded by either a Norman or a Scandinavian Force, and so Harold was nervous throughout the entirety of his nine month rain. Harold, thinking that he could be ubiquitous, had troops both at the North and at the South, waiting in vain for these invasions; however this only tired out his troops and stretched his resources. The Scandinavians arrived first, and so Harold made the southern fyrd march north to fight the Vikings. The battles of Gate Fulford, led by Edwin and Morcar, and the Battle of Stanford Bridge, were both won by the Saxons, boosting their morale but nonetheless they suffered great losses and the troops were tired where…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If D Day were to have failed, there are many possibilities of a different outcome to the war that could have occurred. Ambrose discussed some of these outcomes in his article. These outcomes given may have very well been a history we remembered instead of the one we know today. One of these possibilities is the English monarchy could have collapsed.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the 22nd of August 1485 Richard III, the last Plantagenet King, was defeated and killed in the Battle of Bosworth against Henry Tudor, who would found a dynasty which would feature the first Queen to rule in her own right and would last until 1603. Richard had over twice as many men as Henry but was defeated when, trying to get to Henry, Richard was slain by a rush of cavalry led by Sir William Stanley, the brother of Henry’s step father. However there are many contributing factors to Richard’s death and defeat including, Richard’s pride, Henry’s support from France and Wales, and the support from the Stanley’s at the crucial moment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of Towton

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Battle of Towton was fought during the Wars of the Roses on 29 March 1461, near the village Towton in Yorkshire. It was the "largest and bloodiest battle ever fought on English soil". According to chroniclers, more than 50,000 soldiers from York and Lancaster fought for hours on a snowstorm on that day, (which was a Palm Sunday.) A newsletter said a week after the battle reported that 28,000 died on the battlefield. The fight brought about a monarchical change in England. Edward IV displaced Henry VI as King of England, getting the head of the Lancastrians and his key supporters out of the country.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 4 reasons for William's victory in the battle of Hastings. First, there was his preparation, the next, William's leadership. Then, Harold's weaknesses: and finally, luck. I think that luck was the main reason for William's victory because, without the wind changing at the precise moment when Harold was still at Stamford Bridge, William would not have been able to accomplish an amphibious landing unnoticed to invade the southern side of England before Harold arrived, ultimately crowning William king of England.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English and French have a rich history of engaging in wars. The friction between the two countries began in earnest when William the Conqueror seized power in England and brought Normandy with him into the British Kingdom. The Hundred Years war, which interestingly did not actually last for a hundred years, but rather a hundred and sixteen years, marked the apex of fighting between the two countries. One notable battle in the war was the Battle of Crecy, which took place in 1346, a mere ten years into the start of the war. The battle proved a decisive victory for the English, marked notably by the English use of the longbow. Ultimately, as Froissart seems to exhibit in his recanting of the battle, the British victory can be traced back to superior strategy and preparation.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King William's War, which occurred from between 1689 to 1697, was the first of a series of colonial conflicts between France and England for supremacy in North America. It started when King William III of England allied himself with the League of Augsburg; certain German states, Spain, Sweden, Austria, and the Netherlands,; to oppose French expansion. In America, King William¡¯s War, or otherwise called The War of the Grand Alliance or the War of the League of Augsburg, was fought between the English and its Indian allies and the French and its Indian allies. The first major conflict occurred on February 9, 1690 when the French and Indian forces from Montreal attacked and burned Schenectady, New York. The English responded by the seizure of Port Royal on May 11, 1690. However, it was recaptured a year later by the French. The city of Quebec was also attacked by English forces in their first major military operation of King William's War, but they were obstructed by the French troops. The war ceased in a stalemate and officially ended with the Treaty of Ryswick, which ended the fighting in America and Europe, and returned all colonial possessions to their prewar status.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams victory in 1066 is suprising in some ways, this is because King Harold came up with some good choices. Harold was smart enough to think of making a shield wall with his army. By making a shield wall, William's army would have been struggling to fight them. The shield wall was formed by every man in the army to stand shoulder to shoulder to make it more stronger. Each shield was made from wood and covered in metal which would help the shield wall more protective and stronger. Another good choice from King Harold was positioning his army at the top of Senlac Hill. This was a good choice because William's army were firing arrows at them. This would result in the arrows being fired and missing Harold's army completely.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays