Preview

Why Would The Founding Fathers Want To Replace The Articles Of Confederation With A Federal Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Would The Founding Fathers Want To Replace The Articles Of Confederation With A Federal Republic
ϖ Why would the founding fathers want to replace the Articles of Confederation with a federal republic? Why would this not lead to tyranny?
Prior to the American Revolutionary War, the colonists were longed for their freedom. They accepted their challenge to demand the natural rights and liberties of a mankind even though they had to give up their lives. The Articles of Confederation, at some point, could be considered as a complete form of freedom they deserved although it was failed to clearly demonstrate the nation as a one whole country because it lacks in unifying people in the same society.
Although the demanding of creating a new central government was faced greatly oppositions, the Framers had successful promote the idea of centralized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There was opposition to the constitution because many mainly the anti-federalists believed it would turn into tyranny and everything that happened in the American Revolution and there steps towards a democracy would end and it would become like Britain. Therefore the war would mean nothing and democracy would not happen, the government would take over.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In some ways The Articles of Confederation was a dream come true for the states. Small states such as Rhodes Island benefited from the equal number of votes in congress. Also it allowed the states to run themselves with little interference from the central government. In other ways the articles became a nightmare. The Articles of Confederation…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were well written, especially considering the fact that the U.S.A. was a brand-new country and had no knowledge whatsoever on how to run a country. Though they were good, the articles didn't provide America with a very effective government. Since the people were afraid of a centralized government that would become too powerful, they decided to move most issues to a state level, rather than a national one. This is problematic because of it's economic effects, and because of the effects on politics and the limitations of the federal governments.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Revolutionary War, originators of the Articles of Confederation had checked that the federal government could never do rob power from the each individual state. The outcome was that the national Congress was very weak and even politically weak which make them not to keep national unity and went almost bankrupt. The specter of rebellion and collapse forced American elites to make a stronger and more centralized government under the Constitution.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With high hopes for the articles, there was great disappointment due to its effectiveness. The articles of confederation failed to provide the United States with an effective government. The central government was designed and planned to be eminently weak. It was formed to defend the states as a whole, but had…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some believed the Articles of Confederation could simply be amended, however they soon realized drastic changes were needed. Those that lobbied for a stronger national government saw the effects of too much power left in the hands of the citizens during Shays Rebellion. And so continued the balance between liberty and order. They also recognized the need to strengthen its weakest point, the inability to tax. The end result was the Constitution which established three branches of government; the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary. This three branch system was a radical change but it provided a system of checks and balances. It did not come without great debate. There were…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Revolution of 1776, America had to transition itself from thirteen disjointed colonies to one unified nation. In 1777, the Articles of Confederation was drafted and submitted for the states’ approval. Out of thirteen states, only eight ratified the plan for a national government by 1778, while nearly three more years passed before the last state approved the Articles (Soomo Publications, 2015). Although the Articles of Confederation provided a system for the Continental Congress to direct the Revolutionary War, Congress felt the need for a stronger union with enough power to defeat Great Britain. The belief that a constitutional order must be fitting to its republican character was met with the fear of a central authority (HistoryEd, 2009). Such a fear may have potentially devastated the ability to adequately serve a considerable union like the United States. In response to this fear, Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton published essays in hopes of swaying the public opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution. The Federalist Papers are a collection of eighty-five articles written by Hamilton, as well as James Madison and John Jay, promoted ratifying the Constitution in hopes of creating a resilient, centralized government (Lutz, 1990). After months of deliberation at the Constitutional Convention in Pennsylvania, a Constitution was ratified and agreed upon by the states.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws but it was able to keep the new nation alive and together and it protected the rights of the minority,…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The founding fathers wanted a republic wanted a republic with no monarchy, to have elected representatives and limited government. The founding father created government with the past and the experience to see what worked and what did not. The ancients, who were Greek like Plato and Aristotle, thought that the government should promote human excellence. Plato recognized three types pf government, monarchy, aristocracy and democracy.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays