In this passage the author is talking about how the web is being used vigorously by college students every day. He sees that colleges are losing their need to have classes in a classroom when they can take classes online from their homes. The cost of having a class in an actual classroom is costly. The colleges have to rent space to have the classes in then pay a professor to come into a room and teach the students in a normal classroom setting. Since the technology has upgraded so will colleges. The author sees that eventually colleges will have to cut costs with the educational government allowances being cut, they will have to…
In today's society, a college degree is almost required to earn an income that will allow people to live comfortably above the national poverty level. For years the only option to obtain a degree was to go to a traditional college; where students had to sit in a classroom, listen to an instructor, take notes, and attend at specific times during the day. In 1976, Dr. John Sperling founded the University of Phoenix, wanting to provide an alternate means of obtaining an education for people who either: had a job without a degree and wanted to earn one, or who had a job with a degree but wanted to change their career path so they needed to get a new degree. With the advances of technology, college courses became available through one of the very first online classes in the world in 1989 by the University of Phoenix. This made earning a college degree even easier for many people. While there are advantages to getting a degree online, there are also advantages to sticking with the traditional style of education. How a person chooses to attend college is completely up to them and their decision should be made based on what their personal needs and wants are regarding scheduling concerns, classroom styles, and the resources that are available to help them through school. To make the best decision on how they obtain their higher education, potential students need to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both online and traditional education.…
In reading Zephry Teachout’s article, “Will the Web Kill Colleges?” he sheds light on the differences that is taking place in how students are earning their degrees. He discussed a few key points that reflected why he thought there was a shift to online learning, they were: a) the cost of online learning is significantly low, as online qualifications cost a college less to provide , b) the quality of the education earned through online learning may not be up to par, and c) questioned the validity of the degree earned and if employers would hire an employee that earned a degree from a traditional institution over an online school, and d) the ease of online learning versus attending classes in person, and the increased attendance for those who could not afford attending traditional institutions.…
The article brings to some interesting views on the futures of colleges and the experience that goes along with that first important step into adulthood. He brings some serious points to the argument. First, the traditional college experience versus an online college experience. Next, the quality of the online course information, as well as, having a tenured professor or an average non-degreed person teaching/monitoring a course. Then, he asks the question “Will employers take a person with an online degree just as serious as a traditional means degree?” Will they hold the same water so to speak? And finally, he weighs the pros and cons of the cost of attendance, the ability of non-traditional students to get a degree in their own time when they could not before.…
The author of the article “Will the Web Kill Colleges”, Zephyr Teachout states that students don’t have to be in a classroom to be able to ask questions or to learn. The author states. “Online classes are cheaper to produce.” (Chaffee 2012). Another key point suggests that web courses will allow the lower income students to have better opportunities to obtain a college degree. The high cost of tuition for a traditional Ivy League university with the traditional classroom settings would also entice students to look toward online courses with the comforts of your own home environment.…
In his 2011 article, “Reliance on Online Materials Hinders Learning Potential for Students,” David Smith attempts to build upon student’s obligated online interaction to make a case against online classes. Smith first shows how much today’s learners must use online materials by using the example of his own Alma Mater. By referencing his own experience at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln, with MyRED and EBSCO search engine, Smith lays the grounds for the focus of his argument. He then attempts to use what seem to be personal examples of experience with online coursework while begging the question through repeated examples. By failing to establish the credibility of his facts, attempting to force his own authority over the subject, and poorly organizing his thoughts, Smith fails to create a strong and compelling argument against online classes and the internet as a resource.…
As an educator, I feel that class size makes a great difference in a student’s ability to learn, focus and feel self confident about learning. According to an education week Survey conducted, revealed that 83% of teachers and 60% of principals agree that there…
When choosing a college or university, one of the top factors that are looked at is price and it 's no secret that college is expensive. Whether or not one is paying in-state tuition or out-of-state tuition, it 's not inexpensive. And with the tough economical times bestowed upon America, if people are looking to cut back and control spending, online courses may be the right way to go. For example, as cited in the article, East Carolina offers an on-line undergraduate…
Yet in such a harsh time, online schooling presents itself as an opportunity that is more affordable, flexible, and faster than attending a university in person. Online schooling is more affordable because you don’t have to pay the school for lodging, digital books are made available for rent, and you don’t have to travel to get to the campus. Online schooling is flexible because you can do your homework whenever it is convenient for you. If you work in the mornings, for example, you can come home in the evening and do your homework in your available time. When you don’t have to attend lectures at a campus, you are able to read through the material, which allows you to get done at your own pace, and because the courses are more concentrated on the material, the semester itself is much shorter than the semester of those attending a brick and mortar school, which makes online schooling a faster way to get a…
Our employees are already skilled at what they do here at our company, but imagine if they were to learn more skills that would not only benefit their future here, but our company’s future. Our employees will have a choice whether or not, they want to go to an in-class college or online college. Now, we prefer they go to an in-class college. This way, they can work on communicate and learn how to work with others, like they do at work. Some employees might prefer to go to an online college, for the simple fact that it won’t cut into time for the company. They will be able to take their time with an online school. It seems to be an easier and more convenient choice for employees. It will also help them when it comes to promotions and hiring for higher level jobs within the company.…
In “Why Are So Many Students Still Failing Online,” Rob Jenkins, professor of English at Georgia Perimeter College, brings online courses and their cons out into the open. Professor Jenkins argues in his article whether every course should be available to be taken online or if every student should be allowed to take courses online. Are the advantages that the school receives from online classes worth the failure of their students?…
In my First Year Writing class, I was first exposed to articles that dealt with educational issues such as the promotion of online-education and the advancement of math and science at the expense of the Liberal Arts. My professor began a class discussion about the popularization of online education by assigning David Brook’s article “The Campus Tsunami.” Brooks documents the millions of dollars dedicated by elite colleges such as Harvard and M.I.T. to e-learning the year. Before reflecting upon and researching the issue, I thought of e-learning as a convenient, cheap and efficient form of education. Brooks’s article confirmed my initial feelings. However, in this FYW required readings like an “An Elite College Education, Online?” (which were response letters to Brook’s article) and “Summa Cum Avaritia” by Nick Brommel that forced me to engage the alternative point of veiw. These two articles argue that online classes should not supplant the class…
The complex issue of online courses being offered to high school students actually consists of several smaller issues. First of all, should all students have the opportunity to take online courses?…
The Internet has made many things possible that would have been difficult to imagine just a few decades ago. People are able to find information on almost any subject in a few seconds, and more people are able to educate themselves as a result. Many people have also found more opportunities for education through developments in online education. Accredited universities are offering a wide-range of courses for undergraduates and graduate students, and studying through the channels of the Internet has made higher education much more flexible. Although there were many educators and institutions that were skeptical on how effective online education could be and the usage of media on school can also…
Community colleges and Universities see this as a opportunity to increase prices in tuition and decline people from enrolling. While this catastrophic event is occuring a new technology is forming, MOOC’s. MOOC’s is described as Massive Open Online Courses, that allows students to receive a higher education at a much lower cost. Martin Ford author of Rise of the Robots as stated previously, refers to Thomas Friedman columnist of the New York Times perspective on MOOC’s, “online courses had the potential to ‘unlock a billion more brains to solve the world’s biggest problems.’” The basis of Friedman’s argument is that online courses, has the ability to allow more people to recieve an education and with that it can lead to greater possibilities in the job industry. Open online courses would require you to complete all course objectives with the help of a computer as your teacher. The advantage to having a computer as your teacher is that, it’s made from the knowledge of millions of qualified databases. Therefore, no question of a student will go unanswered. According to Ford, “About 70 percent of US college students borrow, and the average debt at graduation is just under $30,000.” In other words, Martin Ford is showing the pit college can make in your pocket no matter the degree you are pursuing. With online courses…