For how long will English constituencies and English Honourable members tolerate...at least 119 Honourable Members from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland exercising an important, and probably often decisive, effect on English politics while they themselves have no say in the same matters in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?
In other words how long can the English tolerate the Scottish telling them what to do, while the Scottish would tolerate no such interference? This question was originally raised in the 1970s, but it was essentially a moot point. After all the Scottish narrowly missed out on their new parliament and so the English had just as much say over the Scottish as the Scottish had over the English.
In 1998 that changed when the Scottish and Welsh voted for their own devolved assemblies. Again this was not a big issue except when there were a couple of large backbench revolts over purely English matters when the government relied on Scottish MPs. For the first two Labour terms the Labour Party had more English votes and MPs than the Conservative Party, along with an (almost) English Prime Minister who sat for an English seat. However in 2005 this changed. The Conservatives picked up more votes in England, even if it was by a tiny margin of around 20,000 although they still had fewer seats. Scottish ministers sitting for Scottish seats were starting to hold English only portfolios such as health and transport and then Tony Blair was replaced by Gordon Brown who had spent all his life in Scotland, represented a Scottish seat and had a very obvious Scottish accent.
The West Lothian question was still on the back burner as David Cameron looked like he was going to win the election. However he did not. Instead he has to govern with the Liberal Democrats. If there are any big backbench revolts on English only matters the margin of victory for the opposition could be Scottish Labour MPs.
There is another issue, and that is money. A Scottish person receives a far larger amount of central government spending per head. On top of this there is a massive over-representation in parliamentary seats.
So in the middle of a difficult term will David Cameron try to stoke English nationalism by calling for only English MPs to vote on English laws? Don't bet against it.
By Stephen Canning
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
-In 1997, the newly elected Labor party in London gave the Scots (and the Welsh) the opportunity to vote- not for independence, but for devolution. They both voted in favor, taking a major devolutionary step in one of Europe’s oldest and most stable unitary states.…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
During the formation of the government David Cameron made concessions to the Liberal Democrats so that the prospect of a coalition would look more appealing. These concessions included giving significant cabinet positions to Liberal Democrat MPs, Nick Clegg for example became Deputy Prime Minister. It was these concessions that so much reduced the possible individual power of the prime minister and gave the Liberal Democrat cabinet members large amounts of influence over government policy. This resulted from the conservative fear that any significant cabinet resignations would cause the collapse of the government and a the entering into power of the Labour party (as the polls indicate), this means that Cameron had to keep the Lib Dem party onside.…
- 548 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
UK devolution created a national Parliament in Scotland, a national assembly in Wales and a national assembly in Northern Ireland. This process transferred various levels of power from the…
- 729 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
From start of this period, right through to the end, James constantly faced difficulties with parliament. These difficulties weren’t simply limited to his determination to seek a union with Scotland, there were far more issues and instances which caused difficulties with parliament such as clashes between royal prerogative and parliamentary privilege, finance and how James raised money.…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In recent years there has been an increase in the growth of spatial leadership. The tendency of Prime Ministers to distance themselves from their party and government has increased, developing a personal ideological stance. Prime Ministers such as Blair and Thatcher are key examples. Both Prime Ministers have developed their own stances: ‘Blairism’ and ‘Thatcherism’. Blair, for example, had really bad attendance at Parliament and his Cabinet Ministers have been quoted as saying that: Cabinet meeting sometimes lasted only fifteen minutes. This shows that Blair had a tendency to act like a president. It can be said that Gordon Brown is distant from his Labour party to some extent, but not as extreme as Blair. Brown has good attendance at Parliament and regular Cabinet meetings do take place.…
- 1018 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
James Whitelocke’s position as an MP makes him inherently biased in this debate however, this source can be taken at face value in as far as it gives a good idea of the views of Parliament at the time. The nature of this source (a speech) could lead to the insinuation that the facts are exaggerated to whip up parliamentary furore. ‘I do not see any likelihood of future parliaments’ is a very inflammatory statement likely to appeal to all…
- 1148 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: Howells, C. (2012) Unit 2 Parliamentary law-making in Scotland, Block 1, W150 An Introductory to law in contemporary Scotland, Milton Keynes, The open University.…
- 1654 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Policy and legislation increasingly vary across the UK as devolution becomes more firmly established. It is important to understand the context most relevant to you, but valuable learning can also be drawn from comparing developments in different contexts and countries.…
- 515 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Reasons for this include the Scottish economic recession in the 1980s, the dispute in Scotland over the use of North Sea oil, the misrepresentation of Scotland in the Westminster parliament and an increase in the support for nationalist parties…
- 1484 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The nations of the UK joined a union with England at different times and in different circumstances. Wales entered a Union with England in 1536 when England completed its conquest of the principality and thereafter governed it from London. But Wales retained elements of its distinctive culture despite Anglicisation. The crowns of England and Scotland were united in 1603 when King James VI of Scotland succeeded to the English throne as King James I. Scotland remained an independent state with its own parliament until the Act of Union in 1707 which was an international treaty between Scotland and England whereby Scotland joined the Union. Because of this Scotland maintained its legal, education system and local government. The Scottish Parliament was abolished and Scotland then sent their MPs to Westminster instead.…
- 934 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Ever since he swept to power in 1997, Tony Blair’s unique dominance over his party and indeed, the UK’s political scene, has attracted comparisons with a ‘presidential’ figure. Inevitably, the president most often cited is the American one. This note seeks to analyse: the origin of this debate about the increased importance of the British Prime Minister; the impact of Thatcher and Blair on the debate; and why the arguments in favour of there being a British Presidency might possibly be persuasive.…
- 3362 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Another one of Labour’s reforms to the UK was the devolution act. In Labour’s manifesto they said that they would address the issues of devolution and making the country more democratic. When Labour got into office they did…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To what extent has the location of sovereignty in the UK changed in recent years?…
- 1577 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
As the MP for Bath John Patten put it, “They undermine Westminster. What they ensure, as we saw in the last election, is if you have a referendum on an issue politicians during an election campaign say oh we're not going to talk about that, we don't need to talk about that, that's all for the referendum.”. One example of this occurring would be the General Election of 2001, where one hotly contested topic was the prospect of Britain joining the Euro. Many arguments should have been made regarding our relationship to the Single Currency – none were, however. This is because Gordon Brown indicated a referendum would be held, effectively sweeping the entire issue under the carpet, and it was never seriously considered again. Incidentally, the referendum was never held, and the enormous Constitutional Issue ceased to be a topic of note, at the whim of the Government. This isn’t to say the reverse is not true. Blair’s Government held a referendum in 2004, on the proposition of North-Eastern England devolving to have its own elected assembly. The Regional Assemblies were a large project for the Labour Government, but the North-East shot it down, with 77.9% of the votes cast showing a no to the…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise others.…
- 6550 Words
- 27 Pages
Powerful Essays