Preview

William Pitt

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William Pitt
Pitt’s consolidation of power
How did the 1784 election consolidate William Pitt’s power?
In December 1783, George III ended the Fox-North coalition, and appointed William Pitt as Prime Minister. However Pitt had little support in the House of Commons, calculations suggests he could rely on 149 votes and was opposed by Fox and North, numbering about 230 in total.
In order to reduce power of the opposition Pitt offered his allies, including Fox, to the cabinet. Government was immediately defensive and in January 1784 was defeated on a motion of no confidence. However Pitt refused to resign, despite the defeat, he retained support of the King and support of the House of Lords. This led to creating influences on the public and some members to even switch their support to Pitt. Therefore, having the support from the King and Lords were significant and gradually increased the consolidation of William Pitt’s power.
Raising support in the House of Commons for the election in 1784 also consolidated William Pitt’s power, as it portrayed to the other MP’s his ability who may go on and support him as a non partisan, and sow seeds of division and doubt within the coalition. The election could then be held in more favourite circumstances which consolidate Pitt’s power. Similarly, raising support outside the Commons for the election in 1784 strengthened Pitt’s power as he was gaining support from the public, increasing his votes to power.
Also, since the King appointed Pitt, they had a polite relationship, this implies that the support from outside and inside the House of Commons and from the King, showed that he had a good chance on winning the election, and consolidated his overall power.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though by this decade the Monarchy did not have the feudal power it had held in the 16th century, King George III was crucial in creating Pitt’s dominance. For any government to be successful it needed the backing of the King. This had been shown by the failure of the Fox-North coalition due to the King refusing to use royal patronage during the period. Royal influence created and maintained much of Pitt’s support. In 1784 alone, the King created 119 new peerages. He tactically gave titles to men who had influence over men in the Commons. For example, he gave a peerage to the second son of the Duke of Northumberland, leading to six of the Duke’s seven loyalists becoming supporters of the new government. All this led to Pitt having an ever increasing majority in Parliament, making it easier and easier for him to carry out his plans.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pitt gained support in and outside the commons separately. Pitt’s idea was to delay an immediate election in order for him to tackle his opposition head on. He though that this demonstrate his ability to independent MPs who would then support him in the long-term. ‘Pitt was determined to face his critics in the Commons, and events showed that his judgement was sound. It needed considerable nerve and courage to defy the coalitionists in the Commons. Pitt calculated that if he could impress the House he would set in train a shift of opinion away from the opposition and towards himself. This meant that when the Election took place the morale of the opposition would already be low. He knew that many of North’s followers had been reconciled to the coalition with Fox only because it held out the prospect of a stable ministry. Now that this expectation had been…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When William Pitt came to be prime minister in 1783, Britain was in a state of serious depression after the American War, and therefore needed reform and change. Pitt recognized the countries requirements and attempted to bring about several different types of reforms to all aspects of British life. His reforms had varied success due to many different factors, such as the public opinion, the desires of members in parliament, and also the king. Some of Pitt’s reforms proved very successful in bringing Britain back in to a prosperous position after the American war, while others lacked popularity and failed. The reasons for these varied successes are vast and there are many different aspects as to why some succeeded while others failed.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments can be considered to have dealt poorly with rebellion on account of repeated noble support for rebellions throughout the period. The support of the nobility was crucial to maintaining control of the localities and additionally, noble support of a rebellion could increase the risk of a rebellion overthrowing the monarch. This was due to the likely contribution of funds to bolster supplies and troops with the involvement of retainers and experienced foreign mercenaries. Lack of noble co-operation with the government could also increase the threat of rebellion. This can be seen in the Cornish rebellion of…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course Pitt’s early political career was very important, as it is essential to recognise that he achieved his post as Prime Minister only by cleverly and politically climbing up the political ladder. During the 1780 elections, Pitt contested the “University of Cambridge” seat, but unfortunately lost. However during the next year of 1781, Pitt entered the House of Commons, within a year of entering the House of Commons, Pitt was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Death of Lord Rockingham was also very important for Pitt’s rise to power. Many Whigs who had formed a part of the Rockingham ministry, including Charles James Fox, now refused to serve under the new Prime Minister. Pitt, however, was comfortable joining the Shelburne Government; he was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer (making use of his mathematics education).…

    • 716 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British politics at the time was highly corrupt. People were sent to parliament on the basis of their wealth and connections rather than actual ability. Patronage was commonplace. This was the process by which an MP was sent to parliament by recommendation of an influential contact. The person making the recommendation would be under some pressure to choose good people (in terms of their own reputation) but the process was wholly undemocratic. The existence of rotten boroughs also shows the dishonest nature of politics at the time. These were deserted towns that still sent an MP to parliament from times when their populations were larger. It was easy for a politician to bribe the inhabitants of such a town, since votes were cast publicly on noisy stages called hustings. Pitt's family connections were therefore key to his political success. His alliance with the King was also highly valuable to him. Without George III Pitt could never have gotten into power. His dependency on the King was reflected in his actions over the Regency Crisis. In late 1788 George III became mentally ill. Fox quickly went to the Prince Regent for support (in order that he could gain power through royal patronage, of which he had always claimed to be a fierce critic) and hoped to get into office since the current King was no longer fit to rule. However the Prince was unpopular…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From start of this period, right through to the end, James constantly faced difficulties with parliament. These difficulties weren’t simply limited to his determination to seek a union with Scotland, there were far more issues and instances which caused difficulties with parliament such as clashes between royal prerogative and parliamentary privilege, finance and how James raised money.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reluctance to hold a free election due to fears of Presbyterians and royalists possibly gaining a place led to the nominated assembly, this ended up to be a mixture of moderates and radicals who clashed on their views and as a result rarely agreed on anything, therefore the general assembly was not effective. The moderates organised for the nominated assembly to be dissolved behind the radical’s backs leading on to the instrument of government which announced Cromwell as lord protector, the first protectorate parliament was then duly assembled on 3 September 1654. However, the abrupt termination of Parliament in January 1655 due to the criticism of the ‘recognition’ introduced by Cromwell meant that MPs never finished revising the Instrument of Government and so it was never legally endorsed.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles’s abuse of his prerogative powers , proroguing parliament seven times and dissolving parliament three times suggests that Charles was unable to work with parliament which meant his position was weakend after exclusion . For example he could no longer legislate, relied on cooperation of the Tory Anglicans and it worsened fears of absolutism. Furthermore, these fears were emphasised with Danby and his pensions and the test bill in 1675. Parliamentary fears of absolutism limited Charles powers as the passed the Second test act and the Habeas Corpus amendment act. Historians such as Zoosk, argue that there were underground movements after the exclusion crisis and the fact that the issue of exclusion is repeated during James II’s rule suggests that Hutton is correct in saying there were still unresolved tensions. Lastly, exclusion worsened fears of absolutism as without a parliament, it meant Charles II relied on Louis XIV for money and alongside Montagu’s revelations, it created fears especially in the atmosphere of fears of universal…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Wilkes Resume

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    · 1774-Admitted to the House of Commons to represent Middlesex and supported the rights of the voters rather than the House…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    Although some rejected to parliaments legislation of the colonies, some accepted it. Both Dulany and Grenville thought that as the mother country, it has the right to make decisions about its colonies without a representative because it's the duty of the colonies to provide for the mother country. Pitt and Dulany on the other hand resented the idea that England should be able to make decisions that would affect the insides of the colonies for they believed it's the right of the citizens and the colonies to decide if they should be taxed or not.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even after all the attempts to secure The Commonwealth, the Parliament was shut down on 1653. Indeed, on April 19 1653 , Oliver Cromwell suggested the temporary suspension of the Parliament. On the next day, he was accompanied of soldiers to ask the members to leave and to seal the Parliament’s building. Not so long after, when Cromwell was named Lord Protector, a new political period, known as The Protectorate, began. Although he was never crowned king, his government was still a dictatorship which was supported by the army . Furthermore, Oliver Cromwell was a Puritan Protestant , which caused him to reform some religious practices. He notably commanded his soldiers to damage some churches . Throughout his reign, he established two constitutions,…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As this continued a lot of campaigns were held by the working class to abolish the voting rules and make a change for new ones. Fearing another revolutionary war the prime minister and the king at the time were forced to take action and refresh the rules into ones that would be somehow fairer than the last in order to…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He refused to be a king but in the other hand he accepted to be the Lord Protector. After being the Lord Protector they renewed the title to Protector. He conquered Ireland and Scotland while being the Protector. He ruled during England’s only Republic and he was an effectively leader of the government from 1651 onwards. He had a troubled relationship with Parliament and, on April 20th 1653, he dismissed the Rump Parliament by armed force, setting up an assembly known as Barebones Parliament.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the United Kingdom and its predecessor states, judicial independence emerged slowly in the United Kingdom. Under the Norman monarchy of the Kingdom of England, the king and his Curia Regis held judicial power. Later, however, more courts were created and a judicial profession grew. In the fifteenth century, the king's role in this feature of government thus became small.[4] Nevertheless, kings could still influence courts and dismiss judges. The Stuart dynasty used this power frequently in order to overpower Parliament. After the Stuarts were removed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, some advocated guarding against royal manipulation of the judiciary. King William III finally approved the Act of Settlement 1701, which established tenure for judges unless Parliament removed them.[5]…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays