Preview

William J. Bennett

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William J. Bennett
William J. Bennett is a conservative against gay marriage. He has written two books about American culture: The Book of Virtues and The Broken Hearth: Reversing the Moral Collapse of the American Family. Bennett writes a piece that appeared in the Washington Post on May 21, 1996. Gay marriage is a big controversy. The conservative and non-conservative people usually disagree with one another strongly. In the piece Bennett has a clear and strong argument against gay marriage. I believe that in his piece he clearly does not like gay people. Bennett writes that if we allowed gays to marry it would completely change the meaning and definition of marriage itself. Men and women complement each other and marriage reinforces the social act between them. He indicates that if we allowed gays to marry it would encourage incest in families between same sex siblings. Some young adults in high school claim they are gay or bisexual because it became “cool”, and the counselors know they are not gay. It would be confusing to children if we were to recognize the marriage of gay people. It would be difficult to teach the children sexual education. Also, it would be unhealthy for children to have gay parents, and they would be unbalanced. Although Bennett first states that he understands that homosexuals go through hard times, he shows a great amount of dislike for them. He has a large amount of logical fallicies. For example, in the piece he makes a slippery slope fallicie when he states that brothers would want to marry each other, or bisexuals would want to marry two people. He also makes a hasty generalization in where he remarks of a sample from one high school. I do not agree with anything that Bennett has argued. In my opinion, marriage is based off of, and canonly survive on love. To deny two people who love each other from living their lives together like heterosexuals can, is obscene. We are simply denying not only their love of one another, but themselves as human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Please read “A Gay Man’s Case Against Gay Marriage” by Michael Bronski on pages 687–690 of your text. Then reply with your analysis of the rhetorical situation of the essay. What is Bronski’s reason for writing? What is his purpose and angle? Who do you think his audience might be? Finally, think about the writing strategies Bronski uses to achieve his overall purpose. Based on our discussions of commentary and argumentative writing, what strategies do you think he relies upon to present his position?…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gordon Bennett, born 1955, is an Australian artist of Aboriginal and Anglo-Gaelic descent. Born in Monto, Queensland, and now working in Brisbane, Bennett is a significant figure in contemporary Indigenous Australian art.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judging by the title of this article written by Lisa Miller, readers would tend to believe that this would be a piece of work written to support the religious side of the war on gay marriage. However, when reading through just the first paragraph, it becomes apparent that the essay is actually contributing to the discrimination of the Bible. This instantly detracts from the author’s argument because this places a biased predecessor on the information to come. The author places emphasis on the fact that there is no reason why gay marriage should be illegal. Proving her essay to be void of valuable information, this author did not effectively and correctly present the facts on…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first category discusses how absurd it is to assume that if gay marriage was legalized then eventually polygamy, incestuous, and even pedophiliac marriages would all have to be legalized. In the second category it is a reminder that the slopes can slip in more direction, so their theory could back fire and the slope could slip into more support for not only the LGBT community, but also for those who are mentally handicapped and those with sexually transmitted diseases. As the third category states slippery slopes in general are a bad idea and are illogical and the fourth category recognizes that states, “in addition to the aforementioned reasons, a distinction between gay marriages and polygamous and incestuous marriages can be made based on the concept of “choice.” This fallacy is extremely weak in any sort of intellectual debate because the tactic of it is to fly off into a many other situations that are, more often than not, ridiculous and do not usually relate specifically to the “top of the slope” issue, and this essay is a good argument showing the flaws in the slippery slope argument against legalizing gay marriage.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article "Against Gay Marriage." One does not have to agree with Bennett to appreciate the strength and goodness of his mind. Still, although he raises serious objections to same-sex marriage, his argument overall reads more like an outline, lacking specifics and expert opinions, referring to only one organized, careful study, and committing a number of logical fallacies which muddy and weaken his argument.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bennett makes many over generalizations about the impact the signals of legalizing gay marriage would send to teens. Bennett almost contradicts himself with the inclusion of the quote from Harvard professor E.L. Patullo, "a very substantial number of people are born with the potential to live either straight or gay lives" (410). Many people are born with the potential to lead gay or straight lives, it is a choice, and the legalization of gay marriage would not cause societal indifference, but would rather foster a welcoming environment for young gays to come out into rather than living in fear or shame because of the hate and repercussions of being homosexual. Bennett also over generalizes the findings of an article about teenagers and adults being interviewed about being gay and bisexual. Fifty kids and dozens of parents and counselors does not speak for the whole population of a country, but also shows the weakness of Bennett 's argument as it shows the lack of actual education there is in much of the country on the subject of homosexuality. Bennett also makes assumptions about how conservative parents will lose the right to teach their kids…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He uses the quote to state that tradition marriage is being destroyed because of same-sex marriage. Then he asserts that gay-marriage is a new trend that will pass and that in every new trend that comes we “lose our moral sense.” In addition, he believes that same-sex couples have been using the political system to their advantage to achieve their goal even though their cry for legal marriage has been defeated in court numerous times. He indicates that religious groups would be sued for “discrimination.” To supports his argument, he uses a lawsuit case in which a an adaptation agency, Catholic Charities, was sued for refusing to allow “foster children with same-sex couples.” Furthermore, he uses another case in which a polygamist in Utah filed a lawsuit to allow him to marry more than one wife, to assert the assumption that “if same-sex marriage is allowed, no one will ever be able to say ‘no’ to anything…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes on Prop 8

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Farrell, M. (2010, January 25). Prop. 8 trial: defenders of gay-marriage ban make their…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal is an article written by Thomas B. Stoddard, an executive director of a gay rights organization called the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In the aforementioned article, he painfully illustrates the injustices and imbalance of the typical “traditional marriage” and its impact on average, devoted homosexual couples. More than just state his opinion on marriage between homosexuals, he emphasizes the injustice by accentuating real world situations. Not only does Stoddard denote the negative effects on loving gay couples, he illuminates the idea of gay marriage as something beneficial not only to gay partners, but society as a whole (722).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Still another key assumption in Sullivan 's article is that having gay marriage legalized would give homosexuals greater hope about the future. He says, "It provides role models for young gay people, who after the exhilaration of coming out can easily lapse into short-term relationships and insecurity with no tangible goal in sight" (285). Here again, it would be helpful to have references to several authoritative studies or expert opinions, but these are singularly…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the essay " The Case Against Gay Marriage," Manuel Lopez, a gay man himself, contests the idea of allowing gay marriage by relating it to his homosexual experience, and more specifically to the future outlook for the institution of marriage. He takes a passive but safe entrance to his essay by discussing opinion polls and common belief among young people, noting that the main reason high school students will not oppose gay marriage is due to their upbringing in a democracy that stands for equality. He mentions the central idea that gay marriage will mostly affect future generations rather than current ones. His opening, however, shows little support for most of his assumptions and claims. Aside from his lack of supporting evidence, his most notable aspect is his literary tone towards the issue. He shows no anger or…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American dream is one of freedom and equality. It’s supposed to be branded in the hearts of every United States citizen however, when it comes to homosexuals, citizens of the United States wake up and the dream is demolished. Gay sex marriage is the most conflicting issue in the contemporary social world. Marriage is an association of persons through which we perceive the reflection of a particular culture. It is basically a private matter and a fundamental human right. People should have the right to decide with whom they marry, not the state. If two persons are closed to each other regardless of their gender, they should be allowed to marry with each other (Eric). Legalizing gay marriage is granting same-sex couples the right to marry and would promote the separation of church and state, increase successful marriage rates and adoptions, decrease suicide, and ensure all American citizens have equal rights and opportunities.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays