Preview

WITHERING AWAY RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3051 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
WITHERING AWAY RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED
11/12/14

WITHERING AWAY RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED

This Page is an outdated, user-generated website brought to ou b an archive.It was mirrored from Geocities at the end of October,

For an questions concerning this page tr to contact the respective author. (To report an malicious content send the URL to oocities(at gmail dot com). For question about t archive visit: OoCities.org.

BACK TO MALA SIA & HUMAN RIGHTS HOMEPAGE
BACK TO SELECTED WRITINGS PAGE

WITHERING AWAY RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED
The recent Practice Direction of the Chief Justice Bil 3/2003 may cause the further withering away of the constitutionally guaranteed rights of the arrested person as stated in Art. 5(3) and
Art 5(4) of the Federal Constitution.
Article 5(3) provides that “Where a person is arrested he shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of arrest and shall be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.” Whilst Article 5(4) provides that “Where a person is arrested and not released he shall without reasonable delay, and in any case within twenty four hours (excluding the time of any necessary journey) be produced before a magistrate and shall not be further detained in custody without the magistrate s authority.
Section 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code reiterates this production before a magistrate within 24 hours. This reason for the production before a Magistrate is for the purposes of applying for a further remand order for the purposes of completing police investigations.
Section 117 until 120 also deals with the procedure and requirements that need to be satisfied before a Magistrate grants a further remand order.
It must be remembered that in Malaysia, a person arrested and detained by the police have got NO right to one phone call, and hence there is no way a person arrested can contact his lawyer, his family and/or his friends. There is also no right of access to lawyer and family when the person has been arrested and detained. There are times

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This section gives police the authority to pretty much arrest anyone for anything provided they abide by the above statements. Also if an offence has…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • After all procedural steps are complete you will be put into a holding cell, do…

    • 1305 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society almost all policemen never forget to read the person under arrest their rights because they know about the Miranda vs Arizona case. I believe that they have put more pressure on the police to say the rights because its a matter of the criminal getting let go because they forgot to read them even if the person already knows their rights. If in case that that does happen I still would not let the criminal go if the case was for something bad or something that would harm…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Provincial Offences act

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages

    10. Bail, probation, or other court or administrative orders or agreements in effect, with contact person to confirm compliance, if necessary.…

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * Right to Liberty and Freedom- You have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason – for example, if you are convicted of a crime. Anyone detained by the state must be brought before a court.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of US V. Nixon

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This also means that the court can be supplied evidence for…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court consolidated four separate court cases with issues concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained during police interrogations. All the defendants in each of these occurrences offered incriminating evidence during interrogations from police and were not notified prior to the interrogations of their rights granted to them under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Miranda was arrested and taken into custody to a police station where he was identified by the witness. He was questioned for 2 hours by officers without being advised of his right to counsel and then signed a statement that said that his confession was voluntary. ISSUE: Whether the government is required to notify the detained individuals of their constitutional rights granted by the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination prior to the individuals being interrogated by the authorities and assistance of counsel and give a voluntary waiver of these rights as a necessary precondition to police questioning and the giving of a…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Court maintained that the defendant's right against self-incrimination has long been part of Anglo-American law as a means to equalize the vulnerability inherent in being detained. Such a position, unchecked, can often lead to government abuse. For example, the Court cited the continued high incidence of police violence designed to compel confessions from a suspect. This and other…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appeals must be filed within a timely manor, no set time because various jurisdictions have different times…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that, the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney. The Fifth Amendment’ s rights protection against self- incrimination and double jeopardy, and right to a grand jury indictment . The Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy and public trial, trial by jury, confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, and counsel.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 gives a Constable a preserved power of arrest under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984 permitting reasonable force. In addition, the caution should…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court dramatically changed the procedures throughout the country. They linked the Fifth Amendment to the Sixth Amendment to the suspect’s right from arrest through trail.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda Decision

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case changed the way police handle those arrested for crimes. Before questioning any suspect who has been arrested, police now give the suspect his Miranda rights, or read them the Miranda warning.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Miranda had not questioned the officer’s or requested for an attorney, the Supreme Court of Arizona stated that Miranda’s constitutional rights had not been violated. Miranda also suffered with a mental instability and did not request for counsel to be present during the case (Miranda, 2006). Miranda appealed the U.S. Supreme Courts decision. After review, Chief Justice Earl Warren stated that the evidence collected could not be used against Miranda due to Miranda not being informed of his rights before he was interrogated (Miranda, 2006). After this case, a series of “Miranda rights” were put into place to protect a defendant who is being arrested and interrogated (Miranda, 2006).…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (1) (a) for any public offense committed or attempted in the presence of any peace officer; and…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics