Preview

Withholding Life-Sustaining Therapy Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Withholding Life-Sustaining Therapy Case Study
A. Overview Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment
Many critically ill patients who die will do so after a decision has been made to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy (Lobo et al., 2017). Health care provider have to consider about duty of care, legal duty and human rights of patient, in terms of the situation withdrawing or withholding care have high awareness is necessary related make distinction between: euthanasia, murder, and manslaughter. Due to the life-sustaining treatment, withhold and withdraw as palliative procedures indeed promote an end-life care approach (Connolly, Miskolci, Phelan, & Buggy, 2016).
Definition of withholding life-sustaining treatment is decision not to start or increase a life-sustaining …show more content…
The same justification applies to continuing a treatment already started, the primary aim of treatment is to provide a health benefit to the patient. Specifically, the aim in withholding is to avoid burdensome intervention, and the aim of withdrawing is remove burdensome intervention (Olsen, Swetz, & Mueller, 2010). Studies stated for this term, this has been challenged by modern medical ethicists withholding a treatment that has not been tried is “morally” harder than withdrawing one that has not proven beneficial. Withhold of life support in perspective of psychologically may be easier to withhold a treatment than to withdraw the tools (Stacy, …show more content…
Condition consider due to withhold and withdraw consist of brain death, coma, and permanent vegetative state. In this situation patient is considered legally dead, criteria for diagnosis include combination of neurologic physical exam and testing (apnea test/EEG), Cardiopulmonary support sometimes continued until family or others arrive (Davis, 2017; Sue; 2012; Taylor & lylis, 2012; Welie,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Long Goodbye: The Deaths Of Nancy Cruzan
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of The Long Goodbye: The Deaths Of Nancy Cruzan

    It troubled him that the Judge Teel described Nancy’s condition as “unresponsive and hopeless” with “no cognitive purpose for her except sound and perhaps pain.” If Nancy feels pain then she is not in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). We did not know what was going on behind the scenes, but later it would all come to light. Our case bypassed the appellate court of Missouri and headed straight to the Missouri Supreme Court, with a little assistance. Our case was scheduled for review in September, along with a case that has opposite opinions as ours. In other words, the parents of a young man named Phillip Radar, that was diagnosed as being brain dead, did not want to let their child go, but the hospital caring for him did. Phillip’s heart was beating even though he was brain dead. Both of the cases were scheduled to be heard on the same morning in September, but on August 31st Phillip’s heart stopped and the effort to revive him was unsuccessful. His death left our case as the only one to be…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical And Moral Issues In Physician-Assisted Suicide
    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ethical And Moral Issues In Physician-Assisted Suicide

    Physician-assisted suicide raises many ethical and moral issues. For patients who advocate for PAS, they acknowledged that the act promotes human dignity, autonomy, and is a humanizing act to end their suffering. PAS is an act of healing for the terminal sick to help end their daily struggles and many see it as a dignified choice. It is evident from patients’ voice and Dr. Byock testimonials strikes the heart of the senseless need to keep the terminal ill alive. Along with the inevitable deaths comes costly medical expenses that can better serve to improve the country and the communities’ welfare.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terri Schiavo Case

    Therefore, one function of caregiver is to prevent and, if possible, end suffering. Hence, to achieve such a goal, actions involving assisted suicide and euthanasia would be permissible (Corr, 2013). Not to many of us, especially those who are younger, have a will or power of attorney. Living wills and advance directives are important components of patients’ medical records, which all too often do not indicate the appropriate palliative care measures the patient desires. A review of the current literature indicates that approximately 85% to 95% of the population does not have adequate advance directives or palliative care measures written in their medical record. Furthermore, these orders may not follow the patient when he or she is transferred to other facilities for intermittent care. Unwanted tracheal intubations can be both costly to the facility and distressing to the patient and family members. By instituting a change in policy, organizations can ensure that patients’ wishes for end-of-life care are met appropriately (Alfonso, 2009). It is very important to meet the needs of the patient as well as the family. However it can be troubling when the patient and family’s do not…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong: Article Analysis
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong: Article Analysis

    Instead of embracing this act of death, we should respond to suffering with compassion and solidarity. (Anderson, Screen 1) Many of the patients seeking to end their lives in this way usually suffer from depression or other mental illnesses, but also from loneliness. Instead of us giving them pills to kill them, the doctors should provide the suitable medical care they need. As for the patients in physical pain, pain management drugs can be administered to improve their quality of life. The terminally ill patients are provided with hospice care and fellowship to accompany them on their last days of life. Doctors should help their patients die a dignified death of natural causes, not assist in killing them. (Anderson, Screen 1) Physicians take the oath to always heal and care, never to kill intentionally. Palliative care focuses on the patient’s quality of life and improving it by alleviating pain and other distressing symptoms of a serious illness. At any age or stage in illness, palliative care is available to help improve the patient’s life as a whole. It does not matter if the illness is curable, chronic, or even life-threatening, medicine can improve your symptoms dramatically, helping you live with your…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Advanced Directives In Healthcare
    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Advanced Directives In Healthcare

    Who has the right to decide when to end life sustaining measures? Is it the individual, the health care provider, or the government? This has been an ongoing debate for many decades in the healthcare field. Advanced directives were suppose to be the simple solution to this dilemma. However, this simple solution has become very complicated and has evolved over the years. According to Watson et al. (2010) end-of-life care highlights the following issues: competency, persistent vegetative state, living wills, best interest standards. Oftentimes people, including nurses have a difficult time speaking about end-of-life care. Advanced directives should be a legal document that allows a person to decide their wishes about…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Right to Die: The Terri Schiavo Case
    • 1580 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Right to Die: The Terri Schiavo Case

    Currently in the United States, there are approximately 35,000 people in a persistent vegetative state. Patients in this condition have outcomes that vary from recovery to death with…

    • 1580 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Acting To Let Someone Die Analysis
    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Acting To Let Someone Die Analysis

    In Acting to Let Someone Die, Andrew McGee critiques the medical ethics view that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (LST) or life support is an act of killing in contrast to the idea that withdrawing LST is simply an omission rather than an act. He focuses mainly, however, not on whether withdrawing LST is an omission or an act but whether the withdrawal lets the person die or kills them, concluding that providing LST merely postpones death and its withdrawal just lets the person die of the original causes that initiated the LST in the first place. I plan to assess McGee’s discussion of the difference between withholding and withdrawing life-saving treatment, a distinction that he ultimately decides does not exist, and the idea that there…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma
    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death and Advance Care Planning
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Death and Advance Care Planning

    Caring for patients at the end of life is a challenging task that requires not only the consideration of the patient as a whole but also an understanding of the family, social, legal, economic, and institutional circumstances that surround patient care. A legal requirement of end of life care is that the wishes of the individual, including whether CPR should be attempted, as well as their wishes how they are cared for after death are properly documented. This means that their rights and wishes even after death are respected.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Physician Aid in Dying
    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Physician Aid in Dying

    Bioethics is considered by some to be the decisions made by a person or group using logic and knowledge of right or wrong as it affects current biological issues. It is a growing concern in today’s world where people are caught in a balancing act of human nature and law to determine right and wrong regarding biological and medical issues concerning them. A bioethical issue that has been around for years is physician aid in death. Although this issue is said to give terminally ill patients the comfort and dignity of ending their lives on the terms they choose, some say that decisions are influenced by doctors and infringe upon human rights.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Physician Assisted Death
    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Physician Assisted Death

    Many of us have felt the pain of watching a loved one’s life slowly diminish in a hospital bed. Today, modern medicine and doctors can only go so far to care for terminally ill patients. Even with the knowledge of this country’s best medicine and most extraordinary doctors, many of the terminally ill suffer persistently; they become unhappy, and some are not able to fend for themselves in ways healthy individuals find to be easy and are able to do. The simple every day actions begin to be tremendous struggles such as eating, moving, and even communicating. In extreme cases, terminally ill patients may no longer find the will or strength to move forward. Physician-assisted death can be constructed to have reasonable laws, which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life, easing the patients suffering when nearing the end of their life. Physician-assisted death is ethical and is a compassionate response to unbearable suffering. Physicians should be required by law to help terminally ill patients, with no hope, which have a strong desire to end their lives.…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aid In Dying
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aid In Dying

    The ethical issues that arise for ones that are for life-sustaining treatment are potential recovery, sanctity of life, personal request, and professional physician integrity. Although there are often minimal benefits seen with the use of extreme measures to prolong life, the potential recovery is valid reason for patients to continue with life-sustaining treatment. The sanctity of life, which is the belief that people are made in the image of God and their lives are sacred and should be protected and respected at all time, is dependent upon the patient. Patients’ values and beliefs may differ, but if the patient has a “low quality” of life and still believes that their life is sacred, then the ethically correct decision is to continue with life-sustaining treatment. As mentioned previously, due to laws that have been created, patients have the right to choose the care and treatment that is provided to them near the end of life. Therefore, it is seen as unethical if anything or anyone takes that decision away from the patient, which again calls into question professional physician integrity. A physician is reliable for providing exceptional care to the patient and attending to the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ethics Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Ethics Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics