Preview

Wolsey and henry VIII

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1164 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wolsey and henry VIII
Both sources 5 and 6 tend to disagree with the idea of the king wholly surrendering his power to the Cardinal and instead state that the king still had some control in government matters. Source 6 states ‘I thought it best not to allow anyone else to bear this message’ when writing to Cardinal Wolsey in 1520. This is supported by the knowledge we have on the king giving partial power to Wolsey, however when making decisions on important cases Henry was always to have the final decision showing that he still had significant power.
This is also reinstated in Source 5, where it says that Henry VIII passed over some control over to Wolsey but did not wholly surrender his power in government, as ‘the ultimate source of all power was the king’. It also states that Wolsey ‘held a dominant position’ which we know as he was appointed Lord Chancellor by Henry and also became ‘legate a latere’ in 1518. Wolsey was left to arrange the Field of Cloth of Gold in 1520, achieving international glory for Henry showing that he must have had significant power to be trusted by the King in order to organise such an event.

Both sources 5 and 6 tend to disagree with the idea of the king wholly surrendering his power to the Cardinal and instead state that the king still had some control in government matters. Source 6 states ‘I thought it best not to allow anyone else to bear this message’ when writing to Cardinal Wolsey in 1520. This is supported by the knowledge we have on the king giving partial power to Wolsey, however when making decisions on important cases Henry was always to have the final decision showing that he still had significant power.
This is also reinstated in Source 5, where it says that Henry VIII passed over some control over to Wolsey but did not wholly surrender his power in government, as ‘the ultimate source of all power was the king’. It also states that Wolsey ‘held a dominant position’ which we know as he was appointed Lord Chancellor by Henry and also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489 to 1499?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry IV a Huguenot prince inherited the French throne in 1589. For four years, right after he took up the throne he fiercely fought for control of France against catholic oppression, and to end the fighting finally he changed to Catholicism. Even though he was now officially a catholic, he issued the Edict of Nantes in 1598 that provided Huguenots religious freedom. After all, of that Henry IV set out to fix all the damage he had done. He said his goal was not the victory of one sec over another but “a chicken in every pot”-a good sun-day dinner for every peasant. While Henry ruled, the Government was everywhere officials administered justice, improved roads, built bridges, and revived agriculture. Henry IV was assassinated in 1610 twenty-one years after he inherited the throne which was passed down to his nine year old son Louis XIII.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 and 3 support the view that Henry’s 1513 campaign was a success; ‘Henry knew he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was also very annoyed at Wolsey his adviser at the time for not being able to get him a divorce so he fired him and had him beheaded but he died on the way to execution.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, there were some aspects of Wolsey’s domestic policies which were particularly disappointing. This is established through the word in source V, “Wolsey sees to carry an air of disappointment”. For example there was clear resentment from the nobility from his policies of Enclosure and Engrossing in 1517 which subsequently left Wolsey having to abandon these domestic policies by 1523 because of the backlash he received. This “air of disappointment’ was also exemplified by Wolsey’s failed process to gain money for Henrys war effort: the Amicable Grant 1525 which failed as it was such a large tax which was bound to stir up considerable opposition, and so it proved. Violence flared in around England, causing Henry to halt the tax. As well as his arrogance and hatred to many nobility in the country which led to him being an unpopular character amongst them. Source T re-alliterates the unpopularity of Wolsey and his policies by stating he was “detested by everyone”, this was common between especially the nobles, however after executing Buckingham and Sheffield in 1521, nobles who threatened Wolsey it is clear that he would do anything to stride in Henry’s good favour. We can also in infer from this source that Wolsey’s steps were for his own benefit and wealth, the Eltham ordinances 1526 is a key example of how he…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Falsffah Quotes

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The last thing that people have to do in order to be a Christian King is doing what is right, no matter what. Being a Christian King is not something easy because sometimes the people that what to be the Christian King need to sacrifice somethings that they love because those things are not right. So as King Henry, who need to completely abundance his friends from the old time when he was a young guy. Hostess said that…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays