Women in combat In the article, “Military women in Combat: Why making it official matters” composed by Jena McGregor, the author clearly makes a strong stance regarding women in the military. One point being, that at least 14,00 new jobs were made unrestricted, while 250,00 jobs in the military still remain restricted to men only. The main point in the article is difficult to point out at first , because the author seems to be in favor for women’s advancement in the military without combat and gives example to support her argument.…
Throughout the United States, sexism is a defining role in the choices that are made concerning who can and cannot perform a certain task the most efficient and safe. Fighting on the front line, in a Combat Unit, is one of those tasks that certainly takes special skills and integrity that not many people possess. Throughout reading and analyzing Coed Combat Units—A Bad Idea on All Counts, many informative, thought-provoking, and straight forward points were addressed concerning women working along-side of men on the front line in the United States Military. While growing up and still to this day, I have always believed that men should be the only ones fighting for our great country, no because a woman cannot keep up, but because men were basically built to fight in the military.…
Women should be able to fight in battle. I mean why shouldn’t they? Men fight in battle, why can’t women fight? Women could be just as strong and as fast as a man in battle. There are some women today and throughout history that have gone to the battlefield in secret.…
In the article, “No Women in Combat”, Darren Graves (2008) presents three main points to show that women are not suitable to be in combat and some facts to supporting his ideas. Although through the ages, the equal rights movement of men and women thrive worldwide. He argues that when women face difficult situations, they will not be mentally tough to get overcome. The traditional that was created for a long time for men now is placed by the comments set later. Furthermore, Darren claims that women are not inherently healthy physically as men in order to be ready to fight in any situation. Finally he advocates the reason that women are more prone to accidents when they are under pressure, high stress with the real figures and materials showing. Thus, people still can see the effort that women contribute to the military, whether or not in the combat.…
Speaking from a woman who is in the military I’m going to elaborate on why I think that women shouldn’t serve in combat positions. It’s scientifically proven that women doesn’t physically perform at the same level as men. For an example, the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) is broken down into two categories’, women and men and in which they have different age groups in which women are held to a lower standards than men. The APFT have different requirements when you turn a certain age meaning your body can’t handle as much as it did when you were younger. Same thing with women and men you can’t hold them to the same standard when their body is constructed differently. Physically a woman skeletal system is less dense and prone to have more breakages than a man. Psychological concerns are that women would be place on the front line and then get pregnant to escape from combat. Another reason I think women shouldn’t go into some combat positions such as sniper school is because you have to be aware that they camp out for days, but a woman can’t do that especially if they are on their menstrual cycle. We as women have to realize is that we can’t do everything as men.…
Did you know that females fought in the revolutionary war? Yes, women, they had to disguise themselves as men and change their names so they wouldn’t be recognized. In the usa today it’s normal to see a female in the military. Women’s rights evolved a lot over there and still are. In older years all women did was cook, clean, and take care of the house, nowhere near the military.…
But why you ask? Here are just a few things people might say to argue against women being able to cooperate in combat duties. Opposing side: There's always the risk of a woman getting pregnant. They've had woman getting pregnant right before deployment or finding out during their deployment and have to get shipped back immediately. Me: Yeah, if a woman was serious about her job, she would take better precautions before going out. If anyone does get pregnant, neither the man nor the woman is ready for the job then. Opposing side: They don't have the strength. What if they were going out into battle and one of their men collapsed, and couldn't get up on his own. Not only would they be able to pick them up, there's like 30 more pounds of equipment on them. Me: They don't let women with no strength out into combat. They get training, a lot of training, and only the strong, smart, fast women get sent…
The idea that women should not go into combat is slowly being changed. In an article from The San Diego Union Tribune author Gretel Kovach states that Marine Corps are planning to open ground combat jobs to women for there might be some benefits (Kovach). The Marine Corps are one of the toughest American military branches and…
Everyone works extraordinarily courageous when danger is experience. Women are not left out. They work as hard to ensure they achieve what is required of them. No gender is designed for courageous acts to be in the military solely. Women and men can work hand in hand to fight the battles and emerge victorious. Women have been restricted from artillery, infantry, armor and other combat roles in specialty. They are recruited to perform administrative work, nurse the ill and wounded, do laundry and cook for the troops. I strongly disagree with the person who came up with this plan. Women should be allowed in the army not to cook but to serve as their male counterparts since no gender is better suited for some jobs and careers (Lianas…
Women military combat women should not be subject to what happens in war combat. women are built different women are more qualified parents then man men would try to take care of the women and protect them help them and save them they women would have to have different sleeping quarters and different bathing areas then the men that’s more money army navy marines and air force women would have to work hard like the men and women structure aren’t meant for some of that work “It is said that this will allow women to fill hundreds of thousands of combat roles from which they are currently excluded. Substantively, this is a poor idea” (cnn, 1).…
I think that women are just as capable of being able to hold down a combat position just as good as a man in the military. I am a veteran of the United States Army, and I served three years in the military. I have firsthand experience on what a day in the life of a female soldier is. I was stationed at fort Lewis Washington and I was assigned orders to first brigade in the twenty-fifth infantry battalion. Our company and battalion was a majority of men, and there was like ten to each woman on post.…
They would stay back and tend the farm while their husbands were out. Women in the United States can be in the army, but they are held at a lower standard than men. Women were denied highly ranking and physical positions. Men typically get the higher ranking combat positions because they are believed to be stronger than women. Until 2013, women in the United States Army were not allowed to be in combat positions.…
For the past few years, women have been extremely vocal on their beliefs on this debated topic. Women have accused men of being privileged and not giving the rights to women. They have made a very impressive leap in the military field in the past years. “There are currently 1.4 million members of the active-duty military, of which 14% are women” (McGuire 692). While 14% may not seem like a lot, it is actually a significant increase, because women were not even allowed in the military just years ago. This may be a good start for women’s rights, but if women want full equal rights, then women should be required to register for the military draft. As of right now, women are still fighting for their true equal…
This argument makes sense because the physical side of women are lower than man. In basic training the standards of physical fitness have been set to suit men, and women attempting to reach them will over-stretch themselves. Also there is a factor of enemy abuse while both male and females are at risk of torture and rape, but misogynistic societies may be more willing to abuse women prisoners. However women have proven to be a good support in the combat system with morale, tradition and mission effectiveness. In the end there are more positives than negatives for women being allowed to serve in the combat…
Recently, Congress granted women the right to fight alongside men in all active combat positions, raising questions in regard to the future success of this executive decision. Women have served for the United States military for hundreds of years. However, as a result, they now the opportunity to participate in global warfare at their own risk. Although numbers in war are crucial to victory, the effectiveness and efficiency of the women’s performance in combat roles has sparked questions from the general public. Many people in society have argued that the decision was made to provide equal rights and to determine if women are capable of defying the odds of the challenges combat presents. The real problems women in combat will confront are much more complex and pertain to subjects relating to pregnancies, infections, and physical capabilities. Although there are few benefits of women participating in combat, the negative effects outweigh the number of positive amount.…