The purpose of this paper is to argue with orthodox statement that saying men is meant to be a leader and to prove that women also have the ability to be a leader instead of men. As part of that, it is obviously show that the deeds of women have not always been acknowledged as it's because, most societies have been patriarchal. According to Oxforddictionaries.com, patriarchal means “relating to or denoting a system of society or government controlled by men”. Until the twentieth century, women didn't have many choices for what they could do with their lives (Heather Ball 2007). However, as the time past and half of the world's population are women in today’s world (United Nation 2010), it is urged that women should be given a chance to become a leader whether in family, society, organization or international level to represent their group or even the whole society as they are quality and quantity proven. There are several factors or facts that support the statement that woman should be given a chance to become leaders that are most of universities students are women, a lot of women hold a superior position in any organization and also the advantages of women’s nature itself.
The first factor that entitled women to become a leader is a fact that shows most of universities students are women. A study by Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) found that 49.2% women opt for higher education in United Kingdom whereas the male only clock for 37.2%. This fact was supported by United Nations (2010) figures that indicate 51% of worldwide universities students are women. The study shows in tertiary enrolment, men’s dominance has been reversed globally and gender disparities favour women, except in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern and Western Asia. Globally, gender balance has shifted in favour of women, which increased 5% percentage points for the period 1990 to 2007. As