Woodrow Wilson was part of the big 3. The big three was made up of the Wilson (USA), Clemenceau (France), and Lloyd George (Britain¬) and they were who dominated the January 1919 peace conference held in Paris. As Wilson was a very religious man, his aim was simply to create peace; he was trying to create a treaty that would be the end of all wars. However he noticed that his allies would have preferred the terms of the treaty if they specifically benefited their nations, and punished Germany.
To get Wilsons views heard was always going to be difficult. “England and France have not the same views with respect to peace that we have by any means” Although both Lloyd George and Clemenceau have different views to each …show more content…
The points that in some ways would not benefit the allies were left out, such as general disarmament or free movement of ships anywhere in the world. So the points used didn’t cause peace but made Germany more angry and more likely eager for revenge for Germany thought that the treaty would be based on the 14 points proven by the German president Ebert in may 1919 “the German people... trusted the promise given by the allies that the peace would be a peace of right on the basis of president Wilsons 14 points”. this means that Germany was shocked at the mass of punishments that they had to agree to therefore making them more angry. Alsace Lorraine was always going to be returned to France whether it would be in the treaty did not matter to Clemenceau, so it wasn’t surprising when Clemenceau agreed with Wilson on this point. Wilson 14 points didn’t create peace, and disappointed the people of Germany, who thought the treaty, would be like his 14 points, only to create peace, and it wouldn’t be too