Words Abbé Sieyès Used To Characterize The Bastille In 1789?

In 1789 French Parisians Bravely stormed the prison of bastille in hopes of promoting their identity through nationalism. The Storming the Bastille, set up an introduction into the french revolution. The fortress was controlled by royalty and erected in the fourteenth century, it’s dismantling was more then a fight for power, it symbolized the end of the monarchy that shadowed the French and the birth of the modern French Republic. The bastille taunted all that stood bellow, high rising walls and intimidating structure.The French revolution was a large step towards nationalism, between the lines of the revolution where events like the storming of bastille that set course for change and nationalism. Bastille on the outskirts of Paris was used
and nothing can succeed without it.” Those are the words Abbé Sieyès used to characterize the third estates value over the current rule in 1789. Sieyès interprets what is at the time a major political situation, he stands beside the third estate and their underwhelming position being overrun by the first and second estates power. The dominate creates a monopoly that threatens the the third estates unfairly. He advocates for equality among the three groups and that all orders should serve in government. He in all sincerity wanted people to realize how the third estate is taken advantage of daily. The most important legacy the source has for future generations portraying nationalistic views after the French Revolution is that it's one of the first documents to express the idea of Nationalism, especially, ethnic nationalism. The most important phrase from the pamphlet is "The Third Estate is France and France is the Third Estate". It is in this line that Sieyes defines what a nation, a modern nation is. It will no longer be the king that is France, it is now the ordinary people that make France. This will eventually one of the guiding principles of German and Italian unification and part of what makes the two World Wars so bloody. This is one of the documents that really represents the birth of Nationalism as an idea, one of the longest legacies of the French Revolution. As a clergyman it would appear that Abbé Sieyès has a bias towards the higher classes and
It is evident how nationalism can tie people together within a country and unit them to better futures. All three sources illustrate events that lead to more civic nationalism and liberalism. They foreshadow a legacy of french pride and wellbeing that all project to the world the power of unity within ones country and what this makes of the nation. All events influenced other nations to become more unified as a whole dependant on each other. In addition all actions helped restore power within the nation at a time of disarray and political crisis. Sources two and three exemplify a progressive side of nationalism that shows the bonding between two classes with two sets of values. This is unlike source one which is a very dangerous side of nationalism that leads to battles and blood shed just to get somebodies voice heard and message sent. It is so absurd to believe that France a country so sturdy now was once at battle with their leader. It is clear that positive changes were quickly made after the storming of bastille to bring equality to the people and evolve society. All there sources answer a question that is beyond basic democratic understanding, to what extent does nation rely on its citizens? This question still is under debate by many countries but civilly answered in France during the