Josh Ellsworth Sgt. Supervising Team 4 Patrol 6 to 6 3 12 work shift
He supervises 5 employees.
He has been an 8 year employee
Policy for reporting an injury> to immediately inform a supervisor and depending what the circumstances were, he would have the injured employee complete a memorandum.
Should if injured they would be taken to San Gorgonian Hospital.
He has known of the claimant for 12 years.
He was a pct. Assigned to the COP community policy unit
He believes that he was assigned in the beginning of 2015
The claimant duties were working on programs for community watch and defend programs for festivals and conduct research and planning.
His job as a 4 10 would involve a sedentary positon as is required to wear his full …show more content…
Past employment:
The claimant worked at San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Dept. before he lateralled transferred to their department. He did not known how long the cc was employed there but understood that he worked patrol before he transferred to their department.
Date of Hire:
Unknown.
What could you tell me about his alleged claim of injuries?
He mentioned one day in the end of March or the beginning of April 2015_that his upper shoulder and back area was sore by passing. He was not a formal complaint when he told that he was going to self-procure his own medical treatment. He stated that his injury was aggravated over time by seating at his desk conducting his job within COP. He understood that it was not a specific date and time when his alleged soreness occurred and interpreted that his alleged complaint of pain and soreness occurred over time.
He did not state that it was a job related claim or occurred due to any actions or incidents that he was involved in within the COP or out in Patrol or by affecting an arrest.
He did not offer medical treatment, nor did he made a report in regards to the claimant’s …show more content…
He was not aware of any other worker’s comp claims which he was injured. He never heard of the claimant made mention to any of his alleged injuries within his current claim which he just had learned of during this investigation.
The only information that pertained to any possible work related was when he supervised the claimant in the COPP unit when he overheard the claimant mention that his ballistic vest was pulling on the back of his neck whenever he would be at a seated position. He states that the claimant was not specific in saying if the pulling of the vest occurred during the time when he sat at his desk in the COPP unit or if he had felt the pulling when he drove his patrol unit or his own personal vehicle.
He states that the claimant did not elaborate on if he was in any pain or discomfort as to the pulling of the balletic vest and recalled that the claimant did mention that he had planned on submitting a memo through the chain of command to address this matter. He believed that the claimants intentions were to attempt to reform or revamp the current policy and procedure in finding an avenue of not to wear his ballistic vest when he was conducting administrative procedures within the COPP unit, and not in the field. He believed that the claimant wanted to change the design of his department issued balletic vest which he wore under his class C approved polo