Preview

World History AP

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8777 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
World History AP
Chapter 4 Big Picture Questions 1. What common features can you identify in the empires described in this chapter? • All empires controlled large areas and populations. • All empires were brought together by conquest and funded in part by extracting wealth from conquered peoples. • All empires stimulated the exchange of ideas, cultures, and values among the peoples they conquered. • All empires sought to foster an imperial identity that transcended more local identities and loyalties. • All empires ultimately collapsed. 2. In what ways did these empires differ from one another? What accounts for those differences? • Some empires sought to rule through local elites; other empires sought to rule with a more centralized power structure. • Some empires were new; others drew on older traditions. • Some empires lasted for considerably longer periods than others. • Some empires assimilated conquered peoples more quickly and completely than others. 3. Are you more impressed with the “greatness” of empires or with their destructive and oppressive features? Why?
This question can reasonably be answered either way: • Empires were impressive because of the impact they had on regions that they conquered; their sheer size and the number of subjects over which they ruled; their military conquests; and their monumental architecture, often associated with the promotion of political authority. • Their use of force in the creation of empires and their use of coercion to extract resources, particularly from conquered peoples, offer a strong argument that they were destructive and oppressive. 4. Do you think that the classical empires hold “lessons” for the present, or are contemporary circumstances sufficiently unique as to render the distant past irrelevant? • This question can be answered successfully from several perspectives, although in order to argue that the classical empires are irrelevant a student would have to address the arguments made in the Reflections

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The classical empires experienced periods of great power by centralization of power and establishing belief systems to maintain power over their empire. This is true for both Han China and Mauryan India. Both of these classical empires were very successful in the ancient world because they were able to expand and create strong political policies to keep their empires strong and stable. While both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India built distinct political structure to ensure that their officials were implementing their policies, Han China and Mauryan India used belief systems as techniques to ensure that there was order in their empires.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Empires have been welcomed and glorified by people by being given empires laudatory names. They are seen as innocent without plans and reasons occasionally like the example of the United State invaded Iraq. Nevertheless, empires are not innocent, because rulers would like to plunder other lands and people by using them such as the British aggression of India and the Americans armed intervention against Iraq.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical societies built large imperial states that sometimes expanded to the point where they bordered one another…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time period 600 B.C.E to 600 C.E the world had many large empires controlling lots land, and two controlled their empires similarly.One of these is the Roman Empire who originally was a republic that had a large bureaucracy that made the decisions, but later on Caesar Augustus took over complete control and claimed divine power. When Caesar Augustus took over the bureaucracy lost all its power and the emperor gained that power. The other empire is the Gupta of India which was a not very centralized government but had a emperor that claimed divine power. The Gupta also did not have a very large bureaucracy like the Romans. The Roman Empire and the Gupta Empire both had a emperor at the center with a small bureaucracy, but the Gupta gave some power to their local officials.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a strong ruler is key to a successful empire. A strong ruler is a sign of a strong empire, and if you have a weak leader who makes bad decisions when your empire will most likely crumble. Many empires such as Carolingian, the Qin Dynasty, Egypt, and so many more thrived because of their strong leaders, even if that time of prosperity doesn't always last long. One great and powerful leader that lead his empire to peace was Augustus. "The era of Augustus’ reign was a golden age in every respect. " (Augustus) A strong leader often brings prosperity which causes the citizens to be more patriotic. This patriotism helps strengthen the empire's military might because more people would be willing to fight for the empire that they…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In what ways did these empires differ from one another? What accounts for those differences?…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In history, there existed strong empires that were very powerful and lasted for many centuries. These empires were able to conquer, defeat and rule over many other empires. They had strong and organized armies that could not be taken down which ensured their long survival in such an era in the world where only the strongest survived. Their stability on the other hand brought about advanced in discoveries and many areas such as education, architecture, medicine and even culture. These achievements made a great impact to the whole world up to date and therefore a great legacy was left behind.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rome Essay Question

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My plan is to take the main examples provided for why each is successful and format it as follows: Roman Republic, Roman Empire, both, hit on other civilizations, misc. I’m planning to link examples that explain how other emperors didn’t do what Rome did correctly directly with my fact on what Rome did do correct. As far as the second half of the question goes I am planning on taking what I have on each empire and try to make references to them during my arguments above. Tom L. was emphasizing Assyria during his explanation of this response. I listed some main points to hit on for every civilization below. Then with the remaining information I’m planning on just picking and choosing whatever fits. If you want me to send a list of my sources or an unrefined copy of my original notes let me know, it is kind of a cluster fuck but has some other background information.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belonging

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    An empire is when a leader controls a nation. It was harder for them to find an emperor that resembled a ‘warrior image’.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arising out of preexisting territorial kingdoms, the Roman and Han empires marked a different scale and quality of empire building. With a population of over 50 million people and up to 4 million square miles under its control, the Han Empire had vast resources on which to draw. The Roman Empire governed equally vast land and territories, yet the two empires had separate patterns of development. The Chinese envisaged imperial culture as an ideal from the past to be emulated by the civilian magistrates and bureaucrats who managed the state. The Romans, in contrast, transformed—through experimentation and innovations—from a city-state ruled collectively by citizens into one-man imperial rule. And both empires became principal models for successor states.…

    • 4139 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will focus on the aspects of imperial management comparing the Roman and British Empires. It will explain what made them successful, what made them fall, and why empires seem to come into and go out of existence as they do. There are two major points that made the Roman Empire one of the longest lasting, and most successful empires. First is the governing approach that Roman leadership took in regard to its territories. The Romans took a more hand’s off approach to governing; they would have governors installed in the territories that were loyal to the Republic and require taxes be paid from that territory, but they would not send an army to occupy the territory.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is An Empire

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The very first empires started with the emergence of communities and the motivation to conquer came with the need to survive harsh environments which prone those communities to routinely attack other living tribes in search of food and shelter. Progressively, the search for natural resources, the need to accrue wealth, and the desire to be a winning power substituted the basic necessities of early invasions’ objectives. Here if we had to draw a definition of empire, it could be understood as a set of territories under the dominance of one chief, one king or one president.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All these provides reasons to become an empire. ' Empires rarely come about by design, they grow organically'…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benefits of an empire

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By having an empire, means having a common identity. Hence, war can be avoided; laws will be standardized and form a free trade zone.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays