Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

World Leaders Simulation Reflection Assignment

Good Essays
1518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
World Leaders Simulation Reflection Assignment
World Leaders Simulation Reflection Assignment
Diplomacy signifies finding a solution to and going the best way about an issue/problem in any given circumstance in an attempt to meeting your own needs without the degradation, and shaming of others in the process. It is also known as the art and technique of fabricating a diplomatic friendly relationship, without the approach of violence to get your point across or needs satisfied. In other words, this is the essence of saving others from humiliation and losing dignity. Diplomacy evolves from both a non-practical and diplomatically non-friendly approach, and a self-assured and emphatic approach once dealing with people. Being cold-heartedly kind and courteous in your approach to others forms the foundation of diplomacy. In many instances, reducing and lessening your input of communication to essentials helps in turn guarantee your successfulness in achieving your goal and prevents you from committing mistakes, as greater volume of communication raises your stake of coming at fault. Possessing the capability and capacity to refrain from certain arguments or thoughts when negotiating with others on an international scene between nations or groups of nations, also plays as an essential component in the development of diplomatic communication. As one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy, had once said “Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.” Plato
The term “diplomacy” is ordinarily and frequently used in reference to foreign policies or external affairs attended by government officials who are assigned to debate and negotiate on matters of importance such as bilateral or multilateral interests, in order to successfully come into terms, arrange and work out a deal solving all issues/problems.
In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other hand diplomacy is the weapon of first choice. The influence and potency of diplomacy is used as a way for nations to get other countries to come into terms with their way of rationalizing when it comes down to taking down tough and controversial dilemmas that involves the society, such as climate change or the HIV epidemic. As abuse and corruption of hard power can more often than less lead to countries becoming reserved and reluctant to negotiating and opening up, diplomacy should be taken into crucial consideration, as it is vitally important, and prevents economic sanctions and the threat of war to be proposed. Though at the same time, it must be taken into consideration and account that diplomacy and conflict are profoundly interconnected and frequently contribute to each other. An interesting example of this would be China. The more China seems to become of military power, and, therefore, is very capable of exercising its hard power, the more people are seen participating in cultural exchanges such as learning the language, and studying Chinese, cultural expertise such as art, music and architecture. This enlightenment of cultural comprehension is a relevant diplomatic tool. The aim and intention of diplomacy on a universal level is to protect the national interests, promote trade and endorse the culture and economy between nations. Having the Olympics in Beijing, was a superb opportunity to bring nations together in an apparent demonstration of diplomacy, and was also beneficial in bringing China to the forefront of the world’s consciousness.
The national power and capacity of a country is highly determined by the quality of diplomacy looked through by the state. Morgenthau emphasizes the significance of diplomacy quoting "Diplomacy is the brain of national power, as national morale is its soul. If its vision is blurred, its judgment defective, and its determination feeble, ail the advantages of geographical location, of self-sufficiency in food, raw materials, and industrial production, of military preparedness, of size and quality of population will in the long run avail a nation little.

A nation that can boast of all these advantages, but not of diplomacy commensurate with them, may achieve temporary successes through the sheer weight of its natural assets. Lathe long run, it is likely to squander the natural assets by activating them incompletely, haltingly and wastefully for the nation's international objectives."
In a narrow sense, diplomacy signifies communicating your necessities and beliefs to others in a manner that does not hurt anyone’s feelings. As witnessed in our U.N. meeting, Volcanus immensely lacked characteristics of diplomatic communication towards Rochben, which in turn came back to haunt them as they came in last, and had themselves questioning where they went wrong.

World Leaders Simulation Reflection Assignment
Diplomacy signifies finding a solution to and going the best way about an issue/problem in any given circumstance in an attempt to meeting your own needs without the degradation, and shaming of others in the process. It is also known as the art and technique of fabricating a diplomatic friendly relationship, without the approach of violence to get your point across or needs satisfied. In other words, this is the essence of saving others from humiliation and losing dignity. Diplomacy evolves from both a non-practical and diplomatically non-friendly approach, and a self-assured and emphatic approach once dealing with people. Being cold-heartedly kind and courteous in your approach to others forms the foundation of diplomacy. In many instances, reducing and lessening your input of communication to essentials helps in turn guarantee your successfulness in achieving your goal and prevents you from committing mistakes, as greater volume of communication raises your stake of coming at fault. Possessing the capability and capacity to refrain from certain arguments or thoughts when negotiating with others on an international scene between nations or groups of nations, also plays as an essential component in the development of diplomatic communication. As one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy, had once said “Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.” Plato
The term “diplomacy” is ordinarily and frequently used in reference to foreign policies or external affairs attended by government officials who are assigned to debate and negotiate on matters of importance such as bilateral or multilateral interests, in order to successfully come into terms, arrange and work out a deal solving all issues/problems.
In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other hand diplomacy is the weapon of first choice. The influence and potency of diplomacy is used as a way for nations to get other countries to come into terms with their way of rationalizing when it comes down to taking down tough and controversial dilemmas that involves the society, such as climate change or the HIV epidemic. As abuse and corruption of hard power can more often than less lead to countries becoming reserved and reluctant to negotiating and opening up, diplomacy should be taken into crucial consideration, as it is vitally important, and prevents economic sanctions and the threat of war to be proposed. Though at the same time, it must be taken into consideration and account that diplomacy and conflict are profoundly interconnected and frequently contribute to each other. An interesting example of this would be China. The more China seems to become of military power, and, therefore, is very capable of exercising its hard power, the more people are seen participating in cultural exchanges such as learning the language, and studying Chinese, cultural expertise such as art, music and architecture. This enlightenment of cultural comprehension is a relevant diplomatic tool. The aim and intention of diplomacy on a universal level is to protect the national interests, promote trade and endorse the culture and economy between nations. Having the Olympics in Beijing, was a superb opportunity to bring nations together in an apparent demonstration of diplomacy, and was also beneficial in bringing China to the forefront of the world’s consciousness.
The national power and capacity of a country is highly determined by the quality of diplomacy looked through by the state. Morgenthau emphasizes the significance of diplomacy quoting "Diplomacy is the brain of national power, as national morale is its soul. If its vision is blurred, its judgment defective, and its determination feeble, ail the advantages of geographical location, of self-sufficiency in food, raw materials, and industrial production, of military preparedness, of size and quality of population will in the long run avail a nation little.

A nation that can boast of all these advantages, but not of diplomacy commensurate with them, may achieve temporary successes through the sheer weight of its natural assets. Lathe long run, it is likely to squander the natural assets by activating them incompletely, haltingly and wastefully for the nation's international objectives."
In a narrow sense, diplomacy signifies communicating your necessities and beliefs to others in a manner that does not hurt anyone’s feelings. As witnessed in our U.N. meeting, Volcanus immensely lacked characteristics of diplomatic communication towards Rochben, which in turn came back to haunt them as they came in last, and had themselves questioning where they went wrong.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Chenoweth suggests that states, nationalist movements and ethnic groups that engage in conflict with each other are faced with two options—violence and non-violence. She says that although major wars between states have become less common, today’s politics are filled with internal conflict, ethnic cleansing and violence against civilians. She asks the question as to why violent strategies are used instead of non-violent ones like protests and negotiation, even though they come at such a great cost.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ability to act in a diplomatic way and build lasting relations – in the real and in the virtual world.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The structural-systemic approach posits that wars are usually the result of imbalances and rapid changes of power. The Democratic Peace Theory explains that democracies are less likely to fight one another since democratic states have a norm of compromise for negotiation. Democratic states are transparent and stable, and civilians direct military, helping to solidify this stability. Democratic states have system provided checks and balances to avoid a rush to war since constituents will hold politicians accountable. However, criticism remains as this theory leads one to the conclusion that democratic states would provide us with the absence of…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Democratic Peace theory, known as the “democracies seldom if ever go to war against another” states simply that there is a relative absence of war between states which foster the system of democracy. This thesis has already established itself as an undeniable axiom for the US foreign policy which could be effortlessly traced in the President Clinton’s address of 1994 for the State of the Union: “Democracies don’t attack each other” and “ultimately the best strategy to insure our security and to build a durable peace is to support the advance of democracy elsewhere.” This theory nurtures the idea that the absence of wars between democracies culminates into the maintenance of peace and security in the international scene. Yet, the concept of democratic peace, like other conspicuous concepts, entails contention; if the democratic peace theory has been valorized by proponents like Bruce Russett, John Owen and Michael Doyle; on the other side, it has not escape the extensive criticism of opponents like Christopher Layne, David Spiro, Henry Farber, Joanne Gowa, Ido Oren, Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder. If on one side, Russett states that the Democratic Peace Theory is “one of the strongest nontrivial of non-tautological generalizations that can be made about international relations”, on the other side, Christopher Layne counteracts it by: “in a realist world, survival and security are always at risk, and democratic states will respond no differently to democratic rivals than to non-democratic ones.” Thereby, the debate of the Democratic Peace announces more to be an inquisitive contest between realism and liberalism and this essay is going to embark in the task of framing the Democratic Peace Theory by a critical assemblage of the intricate views proposed by both the proponents and opponents of this theory.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The “Art of War” is an ancient Chinese military treatise written by Sun Tzu, a high-ranking military general around late Spring and Autumn period of China. The text is divided into thirteen different chapters, each of which is devoted to one specific aspect of warfare. Throughout the past and to this day, the “Art of War” has remained one of the most influential texts of Eastern and Western societies, leading millions from military theorists and political leaders to business management employees, a better understanding of how to manage conflict and win battles. Although he admits that conflict is an everyday part of life, Sun Tzu considered war as a necessary evil that must be avoided whenever possible, asserting that “war is like fire; people who do not lay down their arms will die by their arms.” Throughout his treatise, he emphasizes the fundamentality of avoiding war, and if impossible, the importance of dealing with it swiftly and efficiently. Overall, the “Art of War” tremendously helps the reader understand the deeply complex power relationships between individuals, and how to empower oneself within a democratic society.…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The missing presence of war within democracies are explained by the wide variety of different historical, economic, and political events that did not support military violence between democratic states. The democratic peace challenges the effectiveness of other governmental bodies which highlights balance-of-power estimations and strategic interests to provide factual reasoning on the peace and stability that is built in democratic system. The idea of spreading democracies is something that would bring greater international peace only if a state becomes increasingly economically interdependent and rely heavily on international organizations (The Fact of Democratic Peace). There are two main ideas that make up the democratic peace theory. The…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War and Peace

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The United States should use military force in defense of personal liberties and rights, for stability and security, in self defense, and as a last resort, when peaceful resolution and/or compromise is impossible. The goal of U.S. foreign policy should be to that which benefits itself and its citizens. Peace is possible, but not always sustainable. The topic of War and Peace has been the central, continually recurring issue throughout a majority of United States history, continually affecting everyday modern life within the international community. War is an unpleasant, yet necessary instance that will likely continue to pervade human interaction. Peace, being the opposite of war, is seen as preferable, but lacks the problem solving abilities of war. Because of this intricate relationship, the two will always be in tango, each affecting each other in every way. Foreign policy, the interaction with others, will constantly dictate the states of war and peace, and when their existence is permitted. The essay will attempt to explain war in terms of conflicting self interest, compromise, and violence. The essay will attempt to form a definite stance concerning foreign policy, and answer how we should interact with other people/countries, and why. Foreign policy stance will form the baseline for clauses of when going to war is acceptable. And war will be analyzed in depth to explain why it occurs, what happens in it, and what it ends in. These ideas will be supported by examples from American History, including the American Revolution, the Civil War, the French and Indian War, and French Revolution, through recognizing patterns throughout history, in-depth analysis, and factual evidence.…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Essay

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diplomacy is a very valuable because it allows us to interact between other countries. It is used to negotiate with other countries for compromises and to prevent war. But as we can see, it hasn’t been entirely effective in the past.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diplomatic history dates back to ancient times. Undoubtedly, each epoch had its great diplomats, who have contributed not only to the development of international relations, but also had an impact on the course of world history. One of the most famous and successful diplomats of all times is Henry Alfred Kissinger, the American diplomat, statesman and expert in the field of international relations. The name of this person attracts the attention of many politicians, scientists and analysts for many years. And it is not surprising, as he has been one of the most respectful personalities in international relations since a long time.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Painting Analysis

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Paul Rubens’ “Garden of Love”, encompasses and captures the Baroque ideal of richness and lavishness. The viewer will observe a fusion of the realistic tradition of Flemish painting with the imagination and freedom of Italian renaissance painting. The painting expresses Neoplatonic views while also providing the viewer with endless topics for discussion and analysis, making it a true conversation piece. The “Garden of Love” depicts a scene of passionate festivities. In the painting, a group of aristocratic lovers decorated in the most extravagant of satins and lace are placed in a garden dedicated to Venus. The elegant gentlemen and women seem to be full of life and spirit. It is a radiant summer day, and the shady darkness of a grotto engulfed with sensuality. The painting was described in “Rubens Conversatie a la Mode” as, “These portrayals suggest a general scene of fashionable society.” (Goodman)…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    pg stuff

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    War and terrorism are distinct, but sometimes closely related terms used in modern warfare. The term “war” is used to define both armed and unarmed conflict. An unarmed conflict involves a concerted effort or campaign to combat or put an end to something considered injurious, an act of antagonism or contention. However, this paper will focus on the armed conflict of war, which is a state of open, armed, often prolonged conflict carried on between nations, states or parties. Armed war can also be defined as a state of usually outdoor and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations. Because armed war is often related to political communities, it is also commonly known as political violence or intervention.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Culture can influence business in different ways, and culture is one of these obstacles that can affect the entire cooperation between two countries. Language problems and culture collisions are not uncommon, especially in the beginning. A negotiator must be able to handle these difficulties in a way that is satisfying also for the other part. Mistakes can be difficult to correct and can destroy the entire operation of negotiation.…

    • 2868 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays