Preview

Writ of Habeas Corpus

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Writ of Habeas Corpus
WRIT OF HABEAUS CORPUS
POL201
Stephan Garcia
June 15, 2013
Barbara Jo Harris

INTRODUCTION I. Habeas Corpus
A. Historial Standpoint
B. Gitmo
C. How it works II. Civil Liberties A. Fighting for rights B. Historical perspective C. maintaining these rights
III. War on Terror A. Beginning B. U.S. objectives CONCLUSION

Habeas Corpus has been around for very many years. Although no one knows its exact origin it still dates back pretty far. Habeas Corpus has been seen as a good thing and a bad thing. It has been around for every war we have had. It has also been suspended by two of our presidents in the past. The story and history of Habeas Corpus is a very old one but it is also a very interesting one too. In this essay, I will examine the history of Habeas Corpus, the civil liberties and freedoms that are at issue and the war on terrorism currently being waged around the globe today. I will attempt to show how these three issues are entwined, and how our personal freedom is at stake, more than we realize.
A writ of habeas corpus is a legal action that requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention—that is, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. The remedy can be sought by the prisoner or by another person coming to the prisoner 's aid. Also known as the "great writ", it is a summons with the force of a court order; it is addressed to the custodian (a prison official for example) and demands that a prisoner be taken before the court, and that the custodian present proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether the custodian has lawful authority to detain the prisoner. If the custodian is acting beyond his authority, then the prisoner must be released. Any prisoner, or another person acting on his or her behalf, may petition the court, or a judge, for a writ of habeas corpus.


References: Waldman-Levin, Oren (2012) American Government; Bridgepoint Education, Inc.; Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUPOL201.12.1 Oyez. (2008) Boumediene v. Bush, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_1195 Wright, Anthony (1994) Citizens and Subjects ; Routledge, 1994 Bush, George W. (February, 2003) The White House; President Bush Releases National Strategy to Combat Terrorism Retrieved from http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030214-7.html U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records (March, 2007) United States Senate Retrieved from http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00073
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Entire Course

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 4 Worksheet
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Week 4 Worksheet

    | A writ used by prisoners to challenge the nature and length of their confinement…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper
    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    POL 201 Final Paper

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rights In An Insecure World
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rights In An Insecure World

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Suspension of Civil Liberties in America
    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Suspension of Civil Liberties in America

    This paper will prove that civil liberties, in America, during times of war, should not be suspended. This paper will prove this point by discussing the impact of the Japanese internment camps in the 1940’s, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and more contemporary examples such as the Patriot Act that occurred after the 9/11 attacks. However, the main case examined will be the Japanese internment camps.…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Framers Intent Paper
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Framers Intent Paper

    In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Paper
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9/11 Paper

    George W. Bush: "Address to the Nation on the Terrorist Attacks," September 11, 2001. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eighth Amendment Research Paper
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eighth Amendment Research Paper

    Hornberger, Jacob. G. The bill of rights (2005). Retrieved on January 30, 2010 from http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0503a.asp…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Do you recall "For liberty and Justice for all"? Well it seems as if those six words no longer exist in present day America. As a Veteran of the Military, I swore to serve and protect those foreign and domestic. Like many active duty and veteran military, I felt a sense of pride and accomplishment as a soldier knowing that I was fighting for a country where you had civil liberties. At the time it was truly the land of the free and the home of the brave. Unfortunately, those liberties, that most Americans take for granted and others flee to this country to obtain, was threatened on September 11, 2001. The nation suffered from a great deal of loss, pain, anger, and disbelief that was felt across the world. With emotions becoming more inflamed with thoughts of revenge, the American people wanted answers and even more importantly, they wanted to see immediate action against those that commented this act of terror against this great nation. In response, Former-President George W. Bush and his administration set out to capture those thought to be responsible for the terrorist attack. In addition, Former-President Bush and his administration went to great lengths to go beyond the reach of the judicial system which enforces the writ of Habeas Corpus. These actions have been highly debated all across the nation and even the world. Did the tragedy of September 11th, justify the actions of the Former-President? Was and is it fair that people were and are still locked away, stripped of their basic rights under the writ of Habeas Corpus? Is this “Great Nation” so powerful that the very laws that were put into place to protect now don’t apply? The following exams these questions and many more, including the writ of Habeas Corpus, legal debates regarding this topic, and the perspectives of Former-President Bush and his administration during the time immediately following the September 11th attack.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Rhetoric Of American Exceptionalism
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Rhetoric Of American Exceptionalism

    While America prides itself for it's values of freedom and liberty, these rights have historically been granted to a select few of Americans. History has shown that the concept of freedom and liberty in this country has always been contradictory. During…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay

    “Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right.” (Robertson, 2002). It comes from the Anglo-Saxon common law origin. The Precise of the origin is still unknown, but it still has been used. “Although practice surrounding the writ has evolved over time, Habeas Corpus has since the earliest times been employed to compel the appearance of a person who is in custody to be brought before a court.” (Robertson, 2002). The British colony brought habeas corpus from England and has been used in the United States since the American Revolutionary War. Habeas corpus is found in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It states that “the Habeas Corpus should not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”(Neuman,…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Habeas Corpus

    Just imagine one day you are driving to work and while you are driving you see red and blue light behind you. Well we all know what this means, the police is behind you so we do what everyone does pull over expecting he will just pass us. As you are slowing down you notice that the officer is slowing down with you. You are curious, you do not believe you were spend but are not sure maybe a tail light is out? The officer gets out his car walks up to your vehicle and tells you to step out of the vehicle, you oblige, he tells you to turn around and he cuffs you and puts you in the back of his police car. The officer then proceeds to search your vehicle looking for something. What would be going through your mind at that time would you be thinking where is my rights maybe you would think this is unlawful? After the search, you seen the officer clearly did not find what he is looking for so you are expecting to be release with an apology! But this does not happen instead he gets in the police car and takes you down town. I could just imagine what is going through your mind know “What is that law that protects me from this.” You were not read your Miranda rights you did not give permission to search the vehicle and you were not told what you are being arrested for. Know we both know what you are thinking dollar signs because we both know this is not lawful. This is harassment and the Constitution protects all citizens against this type of punishment.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics