Preview

Wrongful Birth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1355 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wrongful Birth
Wrongful birth
By: Kelly Vaughn

In March 2012, Arizona passed a bill that will prohibit medical malpractice lawsuits against doctors that withhold information from expectant mothers that may cause her to have an abortion. The bill is not currently a law yet in the state of Arizona but nine other states do have such laws. The states that do have wrongful birth laws are Pennsylvania, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Idaho, Indiana, Missouri, Minnesota and North Carolina. A wrongful birth is “ when parents of a congenitally diseased child claim that their doctor failed to properly warn of their risk of conceiving or giving birth to a child with serious genetic or congenital abnormalities.Thus, the plaintiffs claim, the defendant prevented them from making a truly informed decision as to whether or not to have the child.” A wrongful birth is a type of medical malpractice tort. It is not the same a wrongful life. In a wrongful life lawsuit, a CHILD sues stating they should not have been born. There are several elements in a wrongful birth lawsuit. They are as follows: * the existence of a patient-doctor relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff; * the doctor negligently failed to disclose to the prospective parents the risk of having a child with a genetic or congenital disease; * the plaintiff suffered harm; and * the doctor’s negligence caused that harm. According the bill that is trying to be passed in Arizona, there are several provisions. It is stating as doctor can’t be sued if he withholds information from the patient about potiental disabilities but the doctor can be sued in the event of "intentional or grossly negligent" acts and for any acts that violate criminal law. After researching the subject in length, I have come to the conclusion I have true mixed feelings about this topic. I know this is a very controversial topic and as a human and a mother, it is hard to understand how a doctor could possiblibly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: On April 1984, Plaintiffs, Roxanne and Steven filed a complaint against defendants, Carter F. Dillman and Webster Hospital Association. Alleging, amongst other things the defendant was negligent, careless, and failed to comply with the standard of care during a medical practice for permanent sterilization. The Plaintiff wanted damages because she was not permanently sterilized and was able to conceived a healthy child. She wanted damages to include the expenses of their pregnancy, the cost of raising a child, the child’s education, medical and other expenses; such as loss wages, loss of consortium, and expenses for and unsuccessful tubal ligation. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on grounds that the plaintiff failed to state the claim for which relief could be granted because they felt that the child was healthy.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A patient can not win a lawsuit with a doctor for claiming that the doctor did not comply with consent forms the patient must have been injured and “there must be a connection between the lack of informed consent and your injury.” The patient must claim “with the right information, you wouldn't have consented to the medical treatment that ended up harming you” An example previously mentioned would be the Darviris vs. Petros case, Darviris claimed she wouldn't have agreed to the procedure performed on her because of a family member’s complications with the same procedure. To win a malpractice lawsuit related to informed consent “the harm you suffered wasn't disclosed as a known risk of the procedure, even though most doctors would have discussed that particular risk as part of the informed consent process.” If a doctor kept risks from a patient and those risks harmed the patient the lawsuit would usually favor the patients. An lawsuit example would be Martin vs. Lowney, MArtin claimed that ehn being explained the procedure she was told that the scar would be one inch in length. When she woke up she had a six inch scar on her stomach. She accused Lowney of not explaining in full detail all the risks of the operation and not providing all information required for informed consent. When MArtin was explaining the incision had released bacteria into her bloodstream it…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, Dr. Alexander’s way of treating the patient is a great example of medical malpractice. Although the failure to follow the adequate standard of care might have been unintentional, it resulted in a very significant and permanent damage to the patient. When a patient chooses to go to a hospital to seek medical attention, he or she expects the facility to treat him with excessive care. In this case, the jury found negligence by both Dr. Alexander as well as in the nursing staff in regards to the follow ups as the medical record supported the evidence. I strongly believe that both the physician as well as the hospital (unless the physician was an independent contractor) are both responsible…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cobbs V. Grant Case Study

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grant case brings up the issue of informed consent. In this case the surgeon, Dr. Grant informed the patient, Mr. Cobbs that he had an intractable peptic duodenal ulcer, which required surgery. In this case the surgeon failed to inform the patient of the risks associated with the initial surgery. The legal principle of informed consent is the patient has the right to know about all of the risks and benefits of a certain medical procedure before making a decision to either accept or unaccept that procedure. The court found for Dr. Grant, and they point out that there was no evidence to indicate that Mr. Cobbs known about the adverse effects of the surgery, he would not have consented to the operation. The plaintiff could not prove negligence was a result of the lack of informed consent. The complications associated with the surgery were expected risks therefore negligence was not present. However, I really think the surgeon should inform the patient of all the risks and the side effects of the…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rlt2 Task 4

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages

    ''A physician owes to his patient the duty to disclose in a reasonable manner all significant medical information that the physician possesses that is material to an intelligent decision by the patient whether to undergo a procedure ''. Marvin V Lowney, 401 Mass. 1006 (1988).…

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The mission of Poinciana Regional Hospital (PRH) is to provide the highest quality health-care services to the communities; we serve in a compassionate and caring environment. PRH is the home of integrative and compassionate cancer care. We never stop searching for and providing powerful and innovative therapies to heal the whole person, improve quality of life and restore hope ".…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A couple filed a court case against doctors, technicians, and any one health related who gave them a misdiagnosis of their son Bryan Mejia in Palm Beach County in September of 2011. Mejia was born without limbs and no one informed the parents about the issue at hand during the pregnancy. If the parents would have known that their child would be born with disabilities then they would have aborted their child in the beginning of them pregnancy. According to Klaire & Heffernan:…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the argument stems from the lack of a decisive role that is responsible for making decisions when faced with conflicting moral issues. The doctors felt that an agreement with the mother regarding treatment should be followed until, according to their best judgment, she is no longer capable of making the decision on her own. The doctor is put in an ambiguous position to make a final decision since it would seem that his professional opinion is secondary to the choices of the mother. It was argued that a spouse or parent could make the decision at this point, rather than the doctor, especially if it were concerning the care for the as-yet unborn child. However, the rights of the unborn child are called into question if the choice may potentially cause the death of the child. At this point, the doctors looked towards legislative measures to not only protect themselves from legal action, but to establish some sort of precedent to follow. However, even the judge was hesitant to take on the role and stated that it should be judged on a case by case basis. Whether they maintain the agreement with the mother, or alter treatment to save the child, the doctors will always be in conflict when determining where the doctor/patient relationship lies and when it is appropriate to take action against the will of the…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many lives have been lost due to the physician’s negligence. The physician that saw Abigail Williams, Betty Parish, Betty Hubbard and Anne Putnam Jr. and made an incorrect…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s what the mother has wanted and what she had planned. Not counting it was more than likely planned with the mothers midwife if she had one. The mother should be able to do what makes her comfortable and what is going to make her happier in the birthing process. When you want to think about it really it is about the mother because she is the one that is giving birth to the child not the doctors or the nurses or anyone else in the hospital. Everyone in the room on Friday seem to agree that the women should have been able to have and use her birth plan. There were a lot of women there that were midwifes and/or had children themselves that agreed that the women that have birth plans should be able to use them if they go to the hospital to have their…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Bioethical

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I was very shocked to read this newspaper article about this poor woman and everything she went thru for the state of medical and media views of her baby. This is a good view on medical ethics. I hope it doesn’t happen to another woman. We have the right to do what we will with our bodies and the state or hospital can’t force us to anything. I hope I covered everything in my paper. My paper is a bioethical and legal I believe. Thank…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This documentary informed me that childbirth, is yes a billion dollar industry, and just like most things in our society is not geared towards “what is best for the mother.” Instead it is about keeping beds filled, getting them out as quickly as possible and refilling those beds. It was interesting to hear from doctors that the highest two times for a cesarean to occur is at 4pm and 10pm. At 4pm doctors want to get home to dinner and at 10pm they don’t want to be up all night. So instead we intervene, in a natural process, and make it happen when it is most convenient for us. To hear this I was shocked. I have always understood medical intervention to be a positive approach when needed, but never abused in such a malicious way. In a way that takes away a women’s choice to experience if she so pleases.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C-Section

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * In 1987, Angela Carter, who was dying of cancer, also refused a C-section. She sought to remain pregnant until the 28th week of pregnancy, the point at which doctors had once told her her baby would have the best chance to survive. At 26 weeks, however, physicians felt that the child had a 50% chance of surviving outside Angela’s dying body, and virtually none if the surgery was not performed. Angela’s condition had deteriorated to the point that her understanding of the implications of refusing the surgery was unclear, but she seemed to refuse the operation. Her distraught husband and mother would not consent to the surgery.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns, just the very sound of that statement causes many people to assume that the taboo is something that could never happen under the circumstance. Some people do not take euthanasia seriously and make jokes like, “Euthanasia! Is that a bunch of young children in Asia!” and still, maybe the worst of all, there are many other people that at the mention of euthanasia have no idea whatsoever what it is or its effects on people. The fact of the matter is that the involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns is happening and not only in the United States but all over the world need to be aware of this problem and not in the dark about this very important yet controversial subject. Although not very many studies have been done on this issue, it is ever growing and a much larger problem than anyone really realize. Just to give a small example of the seriousness of this situation, The Economist in on April 2009 article reported that a London University study reported that one in every three hundred deaths are involuntary euthanizations.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays