All the different stories in this website are perfect examples of how often wrongful conviction happens. The chapter and the article relate in multiple ways to begin with every single area of psychology whether it is developmental, social, clinical or cognitive is related to some aspect of law. Also, if it wasn’t for forensic testing and technology many innocent people would still be in jail. I also believe that within the legal system there is a lot of manipulation especially in trials through forensic evidence and social sciences judges have to analyze the evidence in a court room and there is no change of it being dismissed or ignored. “On balance, it appears that the presentation of social science evidence raises the consciousness of judges and forces them to take research evidence seriously. One common perspective is that presenting research evidence to the courts “keeps judges honest” by forcing them to articulate clearly the basis for their decisions, even when they rule in a way that contradicts that evidence”(Costanzo & Krauss, 2015, p.24). Finally we learned from Costanzo and Krauss about both cultures (psychology and law) and it also explains how everything is accomplishing a greater benefit for the
All the different stories in this website are perfect examples of how often wrongful conviction happens. The chapter and the article relate in multiple ways to begin with every single area of psychology whether it is developmental, social, clinical or cognitive is related to some aspect of law. Also, if it wasn’t for forensic testing and technology many innocent people would still be in jail. I also believe that within the legal system there is a lot of manipulation especially in trials through forensic evidence and social sciences judges have to analyze the evidence in a court room and there is no change of it being dismissed or ignored. “On balance, it appears that the presentation of social science evidence raises the consciousness of judges and forces them to take research evidence seriously. One common perspective is that presenting research evidence to the courts “keeps judges honest” by forcing them to articulate clearly the basis for their decisions, even when they rule in a way that contradicts that evidence”(Costanzo & Krauss, 2015, p.24). Finally we learned from Costanzo and Krauss about both cultures (psychology and law) and it also explains how everything is accomplishing a greater benefit for the