Wrongly Accused In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee
Wrongly Accused Who was wrongly accused when the trials of Tom Robison took place back in the 1930s? I will present some facts and quotes from informational sources that will prove how people are really the ones to blame. To discuss who or what was wrongly accused? Is to get to the bottom and find the evidence base on facts. Highlighting 2 informational articles, and the book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee in chapter 20 of Atticus speech of what the jury should do. Let’s start with Atticus’s speech and why he was describing the facts and statements of Tom’s innocence. Atticus starts off by telling the jury “Gentlemen”, which he gave the jury a sign of respect. (Lee 393)“Atticus begins as the sender and he trying to tell the jury that
…show more content…
This man died of natural causes but he was the hero that was accused as a suspect in the bombing. This man is Richard A. Jewels a “temporary job as a guard, had spotted the abandoned green knapsack that contained the bomb,”(Sack1). I used this quote is we think the hero of the story is may have been the cause of the threat and that’s what he was accused for. So when I read on to this quote I think well he is the hero, but in reality he discover the bomb and no else saw it. I think people are wrongly accused because they were there at the wrong time and wrong place, but for peat sake he saved a few or so lives. Another quote said “like a piranha on a bleeding cow”(Sack1). Police notice he was the one who found it and they accused him of the threat. He a guard it’s his job to protect the people. The real person is trying to blame him for what he found the bag and warned the police to get the people out of there. “tragedy was that his sense or duty and diligence made him a suspect”(Sack 2). Okay the man did find the bag so what. He saved lives and the people honor him for that. I find the irony hard to believe he did his job and they have the police swarming his home and watching his every move. Why go accusing the guy who was basically there at the wrong time and place? Then at the end they find the real guy who bombed the park and he in a life sentence. They “publicly thanked him on behalf of the state for saving lives at the Olympics “(Sack 2). The man was honor for being blame for nothing he did
This man died of natural causes but he was the hero that was accused as a suspect in the bombing. This man is Richard A. Jewels a “temporary job as a guard, had spotted the abandoned green knapsack that contained the bomb,”(Sack1). I used this quote is we think the hero of the story is may have been the cause of the threat and that’s what he was accused for. So when I read on to this quote I think well he is the hero, but in reality he discover the bomb and no else saw it. I think people are wrongly accused because they were there at the wrong time and wrong place, but for peat sake he saved a few or so lives. Another quote said “like a piranha on a bleeding cow”(Sack1). Police notice he was the one who found it and they accused him of the threat. He a guard it’s his job to protect the people. The real person is trying to blame him for what he found the bag and warned the police to get the people out of there. “tragedy was that his sense or duty and diligence made him a suspect”(Sack 2). Okay the man did find the bag so what. He saved lives and the people honor him for that. I find the irony hard to believe he did his job and they have the police swarming his home and watching his every move. Why go accusing the guy who was basically there at the wrong time and place? Then at the end they find the real guy who bombed the park and he in a life sentence. They “publicly thanked him on behalf of the state for saving lives at the Olympics “(Sack 2). The man was honor for being blame for nothing he did