Preview

Xcvbhjkl

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1169 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Xcvbhjkl
5 Right and Wrong Ways to Deal with Criticism • .5 • 1 • 1.5 • 2 • 2.5 • 3 • 3.5 • 4 • 4.5 • 5

Date Published:
10/1/2011
Criticism accompanies leadership. The only way to avoid criticism is to do nothing. If a pastor is taking a church somewhere—and really even if he or she isn’t—someone will criticize his or her efforts. The way a leader responds to criticism says much about the maturity of the leader and the quality of his or her leadership.

Here are five wrong ways to respond to criticism:

1. Finding fault with the critic

Instead of admitting there might be validity to the criticism, many leaders immediately attempt to discredit the person offering it.

2. Blaming others

Many leaders realize the criticism may be valid, but they aren’t willing to accept personal responsibility, so they pass it along to others.

3. Throwing back criticism

Often a leader will receive criticism, and instead of analyzing whether there is validity or not, the leader begins to criticize other organizations or leaders.

4. Ignoring an opportunity to learn

This is a big one, because criticism can be a great teaching tool. It needs a filter, and the person and circumstances need to be taken into consideration, but with every criticism rests an opportunity to learn something positive for the organization or about the leader.

5. Appeasing

Many leaders are so fearful of conflict that they attempt to satisfy all critics, even if they never intend to follow through or make changes because of the criticism. If there is no merit to criticism, then don’t act like there is merit.
What else would you add as a wrong way to respond to criticism?
I’ve been guilty of all of these at one time or another. Awareness is half the battle. Identifying the wrong ways to respond to criticism and working to correct this in your leadership is part of growing as a leader.
Let’s be honest! Criticism can hurt. No one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    criticism of such people involved in politics reveals a playful tone which is an indication that…

    • 887 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A good leader has to listen to others view points and use it as a earning point and understand that it is okay to change their mind.…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rsat Task 1

    • 3316 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Every leadership style has strengths and weaknesses. Being a problem solver, I can easily understand how spending too much time discussing the problem itself, and not arriving at a solution could be a big weakness. This weakness never allows for the problem to be solved, just analyzed over and over.…

    • 3316 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A good leader must demonstrate the qualities that they want to see in their employees. For example at organizations like Starbucks and McDonalds the order takers are always friendly and greet you with a smile. This is a part of their customer focus, so a leader must be able to demonstrate these same qualities. If you saw your leader being rude or mean to customers yet they are always telling you to be nice this would be seen as a contradiction. Then you as the employee could lose respect for the leader because they are not effectively demonstrating what they want to be done. An effective leader must be able to lead by…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society, denouncing a leader is more common than it used to be as we see in today's politics and everyday life. By denouncing a leader, society critiques them because they do not think of them as humans with the right policies or beliefs. However, every human on earth thinks differently and sees life from a different viewpoint, making everyone discrete. As a result of criticising a leader, a person is simply stating what they think by censuring their leaders who they do not see eye-to-eye with. Equality 7-2521 reviles the leaders in his community, but not directly to their faces. But is it wrong to reject your commanders in chief, or is it right? Should men and women be able to state why they think their leaders are wrongdoers or…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    This inquiry is set out to define the components that make up an effective leader, whilst taking…

    • 4173 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    the tendency is to shift the blame or flat out deny. Even when Jocasta, discusses the…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Positions of power take on a great responsibility. With that, comes an inevitable two face. Two face in terms of appearing as one person, but being hypocritical. Much like Machiavelli’s quote, “So it follows that a prudent ruler cannot, and must not, honor his word when it places him at a disadvantage…”, societies leaders must take…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From George Washington to Mao Zedong leaders throughout history have made their mark. Leaders are either loved and or feared neither necessarily go with good or bad leaders. Leaders have been loved throughout history, but a few in the crowed think differently, regardless of whether the leader fixed world hunger or cured cancer there will always be a few that still despise that leader. Imagine the most feared leader, everyone will be scared. Weather a great or terrible leader, it doesn’t matter how loveable a leader can be, some will hate them but if a leader is truly feared then everyone will fear them. Not everyone will love the most lovable leader but everyone will fear the most fearful leader.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another example of being a failure as a leader is that gains less respect from…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mostly, those commanders are not in the habit of engaging in an easy going debate because they have not been socialized to a problem-solving culture that promote criticism as a mean to improve the quality of management decisions.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership Legacy

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Great leadership also depends on the motives of a leader. It question leaders; are they doing so that other can shine and reach their potential? Or do they just have a personal agenda? J. Lee’s style of leadership sees a leader’s motive as outristic, where the motive of a leader is to use his power for the betterment of an…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part one covers the fundamental techniques in handling people. It emphasis the negative impact criticizing, condemning and complaining can have on a person. Webster defines criticizing as the expression of disapproval of someone or something based on perceived faults or mistakes. When you criticize, it causes a negative impact between you and the person being criticized. The impact could cause tension, negative energy or unease in the friendship. Not only is it bad for the friendship but also for the self-esteem and self-worth of the other person. These negative techniques should be avoided. Keep in mind that criticizing and having a complaint are two different things. Complaints are needed, expesially when a situation makes you uncomfortable or upset. Complaints should be given sensibly, for the person may not understand they made a mistake, criticism should be avoided because of how negative and degrading it can be to the person. Dale Criticizing said “Any fool can criticize, complain, and condemn—and most fools do. But it takes character and self-control to be understanding and forgiving.” When focusing on all the negatives about a person it is easy to forget the good that is within the person. When condemning a person, or expressing complete disapproval, the person on the receiving end will likely never forget. The person will probably remember the negative words said or actions done each time the giver encounter them. That’s why it’s more important to focus on lifting the person’s spirit rather than pushing it down.…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ego does make it hard for some of us to handle criticism especially when you believe that your education and experience gives you the right (so to speak) for you solutions not to be questioned. Regardless of age and experience personality types does make some persons better at handling criticism than some. If your personality type is one of harmonious existence then it will be better for you accept what other put forward as criticism and accept it for the intended purpose. If your personality type is one which is seen as defensive then it will be difficult to accept any kind of criticism whether it is seen as constructive or offensive. The strategy I use when criticism is made of my solution is to judge each comments based on the knowledge that the person who is criticising it has of the topic at hand. If the person criticising my solutions is knowledgeable on the subject matter then I become more receptive that someone who is hearing the argument for the first time. I would also look beyond the reason for the criticism to see if it is a personal attack or if it is just on the subject at hand before I make a decision.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and excuses. Because of their actions the subordinate group develops feelings of fear and dislike for…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays