Pennsylvania judge orders clerk to obey same-sex marriage ban
By Sara Ganim, CNN
Updated 4:32 PM EDT, Thu September 12, 2013
STORY HIGHLIGHTS * Since July, a county clerk has issued marriage licenses to 174 same-sex couples * He's defied a state law that defines marriage as "between one man and one woman" * A health department suit says he "risks causing serious and limitless harm to the public" * The judge also denied requests from same-sex couples in the state to intervene in the lawsuit
(CNN) -- A Pennsylvania judge on Thursday ordered a suburban Philadelphia county clerk to comply with the state's same-sex marriage ban and stop issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.
Since July, D. Bruce Hanes, the elected Montgomery County register of wills, has given out 174 licenses to same-sex couples, ignoring a 1996 state law that defines marriage as "between one man and one woman."
The state Department of Health sued to stop Hanes, saying he is in "direct defiance" of the ban and "risks causing serious and limitless harm to the public."
In his order Thursday, Judge Dan Pellegrini said Hanes must "cease and desist from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex applicants, from accepting the marriage certificates of same-sex couples, and from waiving the mandatory three-day waiting period." He also denied dozens of requests from same-sex couples in the state to intervene in the lawsuit.
Same-sex weddings after rulings
Hanes said in a statement to CNN Thursday that he is "obviously disappointed" in the ruling and will take a few days to discuss options with his county solicitor, including the possibility of appealing the ruling. Until then, he said, he will comply with the order and stop issuing same-sex marriage licenses to gay couples.
The National Organization for Marriage applauded the judge's ruling and said it wants Gov. Tom Corbett to have the marriage licenses declared invalid, it said in a statement.
"This is a victory for marriage. We are pleased that Judge Pellegrini reiterated that Pennsylvania law expressly defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman," said Brian Brown, the group's president.
Obama administration won't enforce VA ban on same-sex benefits
Hanes told CNN in August that he and his solicitor reviewed the state constitution and decided that language about civil rights, happiness and liberty applied to same-sex couples who want to get married.
"We've either got to change the constitution -- permit discrimination on the basis of sex, permit civil rights to be frustrated -- or change the interpretation of that marriage act or change the marriage act. You can't have it both ways," he said in August.
Hanes started issuing the licenses shortly after the U.S. v. Windsor case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as only between a man and a woman.
Hanes endured plenty of criticism from some state lawmakers who said he had "gone rogue" but also got dozens of notes of thanks from supporters, he said.
Pennsylvania is considered a conservative state on the issue of same-sex marriage, and it is simultaneously fighting a court battle with the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued the state in July after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the Windsor case.adfhsjfgjdtygukdhxssrfjhgjudktrfxgjyhuikudrtuyukjudrtgfjhkutdreszfhtsbtjsrwyetyutilotuiyukfsjrydukiluhrstdjkigluoyoguhkl,fkygudjtyfhufkioyjmhdryhugky ,lop;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,cx
The state attorney general, Kathleen Kane, said this year that Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage is "wholly unconstitutional" and that she won't defend the state in the ACLU suit.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In 2016, Dr. Alexander Nonesuch, a doctor at Sunshine Hospital in the State of Discontent, failed to disclose that he was transgender on his employment application before he started working there in February 2015. Dr. Nonesuch, the plaintiff, married his wife, Renata Mercure, in June 2015. Since Renata was expecting twins on April 1st, 2016, Dr. Nonesuch requested paternity leave and to add his wife and children to his retirement plan. Since the hospital’s management and the board saw Dr. Alexander Nonesuch’s marriage as a same-sex marriage, which is illegal in the State of Discontent. The hospital denied his requests on March 5th; two days after Dr. Nonesuch made his requests on March 3rd, 2016.…
- 1275 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…
- 604 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The case involved 72-year-old Barronelle Stutzman, who denied services for the wedding of same-sex couple [insert names here] in 2012. Stutzman had served the couple previously, but said she could not provide services for the wedding out of concern that doing so would cause her to participate in the ceremony which is against her religious conscience.…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection…
- 1076 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Smith is discriminating against their sexual orientation because they are a gay couple. Under this law, Mr. Smith cannot refuse to provide his services to Adam and Steve because of their sexual orientation. However, Mr. Smith has grounds for challenging the constitutionality of that law. If Mr. Smith wants to argue that he has a constitutional right to refuse to rent the hall, he can call the U.S Constitution, Amendment I, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religions, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (US. Constitution, Amendment I) In other words, anyone has the right to freedom of religion and the freedom to practice the religion they decide to follow. Mr. Smith can claim that he has the right to refuse to rent the hall to Adam and Steve because their gay marriage goes against his religious beliefs. He can also call out the Miller v Davis case, where the county clerk, Kim Davis was sued for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis argued that the First Amendment protects her decision to refuse to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples because her religious beliefs forbid her to do…
- 1184 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This case is a landmark in the identification of the rights of homosexuals and homosexual couples. The rights of homosexuals have always been denied and restricted on many accounts, but in recent times have already made the steps to reject DOMA. Since DOMA sates that marriage is an agreement between a man and a women, it gives no innate right to homosexual unions in federal law. By looking at history we can easily define marriage, its evolution in the eyes of state and federal law and prove that…
- 1068 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).…
- 783 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Storlberg brilliantly describes the couples attempting to obtain marriage licenses and those opposing this recently granted right, colorfully paints the picture of this deliberation as vivid as the rainbow flag. Showing Davis isn’t the only clerk with similar qualms such as Chris Jobe, president of the Kentucky County Clerks Association said “I’m a Christian and I firmly believe marriage is between a man and a woman, but I have a family and kids. It’s been a very stressful…
- 644 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
United States is a case that was brought before SCOTUS on November 13, 1878. Reynolds v. United States. The case was about anti-bigamy laws and that the law violates a person's 1st amendment right of religious freedom. Reynolds v. United States. SCOTUS decided unanimous that no, it does not since the practice of bigamy is a criminal offence, and the 1st amendment doesn't protect against criminal offences (Reynolds v. United States). The Utah Legislation website offers what the Bigamy law in Utah is…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 2000 the possibility of other states legalizing same sex marriage led to Prop 22 being passed, which restricted California from acknowledging the marriages of same sex couples from other states. The California Supreme Court overturned Prop 22 in May of 2008, and the court also mandated marriage licenses to be issued by judicial degree, and not by the will of the voters or the legislature. These licenses were not recognized by the federal government and most of the nation, but for that brief period in California same sex marriage was legal. The same sex couples that were married during that time are still considered married in California under the grandfather…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This has created debate and can be observed on the news. The most popular debate between the separate powers of state and federal government is about the new law on gay marriage. Although the Supreme Court decided that restricting marriage between one woman and one man as unconstitutional, some states have refused to abide by this law. It can be seen in areas across the south and the American mid-west. Reports from the Huffington Post found that states such as Texas have refused to marry same sex couples. In addition, “lawmakers in Louisiana and Mississippi, which also previously had bans on gay marriage, are actively resisting the ruling by delaying its implementation”, (Fang, 2015). This indicates that State and federal government continue to be at odds. Even though gay marriage is law, many states continue to fight against this law and make it difficult for these individuals to…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Terkel, A. (2014). Alabama Counties Stop Issuing Marriage Licenses To Same-Sex Couples. Huff Post Politics. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/04/alabama-marriage_n_6801412.html…
- 1334 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The law of the land recognizes the authority of states to license marriage. The majority of states, including Indiana, provide a marriage license only to a man and woman while nine states also allow same-sex couples to receive a license to marry.…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays