According to Woodward, Lyotard contends that the technical and technological changes over the last few decades - as well as the development of capitalism - have caused the production of knowledge to become increasingly influenced by a technological model. Knowledge has become a commodity, and is no longer valuable in itself. This is linked to the division between what Lyotard calls narrative knowledge' and scientific knowledge'. Narrative knowledge bases its authority on obedience or faith (like religion, or a metaphysical conception of reality) while scientific knowledge demands legitimation. However, Lyotard does not believe that science has any justification in claiming to be a more legitimate form of knowledge than narrative
According to Woodward, Lyotard contends that the technical and technological changes over the last few decades - as well as the development of capitalism - have caused the production of knowledge to become increasingly influenced by a technological model. Knowledge has become a commodity, and is no longer valuable in itself. This is linked to the division between what Lyotard calls narrative knowledge' and scientific knowledge'. Narrative knowledge bases its authority on obedience or faith (like religion, or a metaphysical conception of reality) while scientific knowledge demands legitimation. However, Lyotard does not believe that science has any justification in claiming to be a more legitimate form of knowledge than narrative