Preview

You Don't Know Jack: Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
789 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
You Don't Know Jack: Film Analysis
YOU DON’T KNOW JACK

I. Euthanasia has been a debatable issue since one’s perception of this idea could depend on different factors such as religion, culture, and even personal life experiences.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian witnessed how his mother suffered in agony with her disease, describing the pain as a toothache in all your bones. Just imagine how painful that is. At that time, he cannot do anything to alleviate the pain his mother is going through. He felt lost. That’s how he felt responsible in aiding those people who are terminally ill. For him, it’s not about killing someone. It’s understanding that these patients have gone through a lot, and listening to their wish to end the pain rather than continue living but you’re actually dying. Another point is that he’s doing it free of charge. He used his own resources to “help” his patients. There is no personal gain to him, but it is rather an act of service. It may not be acceptable to many but he was doing it from the standpoint of a medical person, of a son who understood what it’s like for someone to live fighting off a disease.

II. “Oh, the lingering of death. What a business. Keep death alive. Hospitals don't make money otherwise. Drug companies either. If you're rich and you have the money, you can pay to die. But the poor, they can only afford to stick it out and suffer.”
This quote from the movie truthfully states that the medical industry is also a business. Most people are in it to save lives or improve health. But there are others who see it as a moneymaking opportunity. To be honest, hospitals and drug companies don’t make money when no one is sick. These businesses “keep death alive”. A patient may still be alive but only because he/she is still in the process of fighting off death. But the reality is that this person is actually dying compared to most of us (since all of us are in one way or another living and dying at the same time). Rich people can afford the operation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people all over the world are suffering from diseases. Diseases such as multiple sclerosis, cancer, parkinson's disease, heart disease and many others. Suffering from diseases not only effects the person suffering but the families and even our health care system. Suffering at the end of our lives has become an acceptable part of life in many parts of the world. This documentary, How to die in Oregon, explores: the issue and the laws of the right to choose when to die, the three main drugs used for this procedure, how medicare will pay for this drug before they will chemotherapy- something that may prolong life, the number of people who have used this drug,and the fact that they can get this drug even if they do not plan to use it. This paper will use the information from this documentary as the basis of an ethical examination of the laws in place for the one's who suffer. First, I will briefly…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian, Dr. Death, believed he was ethically right by assisting terminally ill people to end their life by prescribing and "pushing" life taking drugs. Dr. Kevorkian argued that by assisting these people with their suicide, the final outcome would end their pain and suffering and the patient has that right through the principle of Autonomy. As cited in Scholarly literature Dr. Kevorkian was only ½ correct. The theory is "Practitioners are considered to be acting ethically in their primary intention of relieving pain, regardless of secondary result" (Pierce, 1999). Therefore that is partly where Dr. Kervorkian lost his bid for being ethically right. He was prescribing the drugs for the sole intent and purpose to end the life of the patient. Secondly was the fact that he went from just prescribing the drugs for pain and comforting the patient while they administered them to themselves, to actually administering the lethal doses his self with the secondary results to become the primary intentions.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to fully understand the “euthanasia debate,” it is crucial to look at our two main theoretical camps: deontological or “Kantian” ethics, and teleological or “utilitarian” ethics. Both sides make valid points regarding this bioethical issue. Therefore, in order to form your own opinion/make conclusions on this matter, it is crucial to have substantial knowledge regarding the assertions on both sides of the argument – this is the only way in which to truly make sound arguments/draw valid conclusions.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue that is controversial is euthanasia. Euthanasia is when people assist you in dying, it’s usually performed to end suffrage and pain. There are “two classifications, indirect…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging treatment is considered “letting die”. The disease process causes the client to die a natural death. (Perry & Potter, 2010). Theoretical, emotional, and ethical confusion often accompanies ethical decision-making in these circumstances and beclouds the hearts and minds of decision makers. (Rev. O ' Rourke, 2005)…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The dramatic advances in medical technology has saved and prolonged the lives of many people who would have hopelessly perished in the past centuries. Nowadays physicians are aware and able to cure more diseases than ever before. Despite our remarkable medical knowledge, however, death is still fearful and inevitable.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A. Placing a price or level of importance on a human being’s life is heartless, greedy, and hypocritical. A person’s financial ranking should not determine their entitlement to a fine quality of life. Who are doctors and other health representatives to determine the importance of a person’s life? Doctors aren’t the birth creators of their patients, so they definitely aren’t entitled to establish their life’s value.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A patient is lying on a hospital bed hooked up to several machines regulating his bodily functions. The doctor has informed the family that the patient is brain dead. His spouse makes the decision to pull the plug but his mother argues against it. It is the mothers opinion that her son is still alive, and deserves to be treated like a person, even though his brain is no longer functioning. The spouse holds the opinion that any trace of her loved one has left with the death of his brain and only his body remains. Suddenly, both remember the patients wishes to not be sustained on life support, and they collectively decide to pull the plug. This example illustrates the central debate in the ethics of medicine: What constitutes a person? Does the level of brain activity characterize an individual as a person? Is a persons body simply “on loan from the biomass”? The answers to these questions determine the outcome of every medical decision from Abortion to Euthanasia. An analysis of the main arguments arising in these controversial issues will serve to illustrate this point.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Smith-Garcias are planning for their baby, they have to decide which principles from each of the theories they have researched that they will practice. The first of these theories is Skinner’s Operant Conditioning in which an element of reinforcement and punishment is utilized to shape the child’s social and behavioral skills. It will be the parent’s job to reinforce wanted behavior and punish unwanted behavior. For example, if the child throws a temper tantrum, her parents might put her in time out to show that this type of behavior is not acceptable. The punishment therefore reinforces that if she acts this way again, she knows she will be placed in time out. Essentially the child learns from these reinforcements and punishments. The second principle is Bandura’s social learning theory which deals with vicarious reinforcement and vicarious punishment. Essentially the child will learn by observing others and is not affected directly. Bandura believed that direct reinforcement could not account for all types of learning which explains why his theory is rooted in the idea of observation. Overall There are three core concepts at the heart of social learning theory. First is the idea that people can learn through observation. Next is the idea that internal mental states are an essential part of this process. Finally, this theory recognizes that just because something has been learned, it does not mean that it will result in a change in behavior. To illustrate Bandura’s theory in their parenting style, the Smith-Garcia’s might provide a model for sharing or even increase sharing through vicarious reinforcement.…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is nearly impossible for the patient to rely on another person to make the best decision that they would have made for themselves, particularly when it involves personal interests such as profiting from a will. If there is something to gain, the family members’ motives seem questionable. If the patient falls ill, then there lies a possibility that their heirs will hope for the patient’s death so that they could receive their inheritance. The inability to confirm whether the family actually has the patient’s best interest in mind supports the argument that any form of euthanasia is unethical. Moreover, some families may not have the opportunity to drop everything in order to take on the responsibility of their sick loved one. This causes added stress to the family and can lead to the desire to resolve the issue by forcing the idea of euthanasia on to the loved one. Also, health care costs for terminally ill patients, including nursing homes, prescription drugs, and home health care deserves consideration. According to Time.com, one in every four Medicare dollars spent goes to the five percent of beneficiaries in the last year of their life. The result of this is often overwhelming debt for the families of terminally ill patients, with the care of a single patient costing approximately $39,000 exceeding the financial assets for many households. When the patient is uninsured or denied coverage from an insurance company, the family inherits the costs. In cases like these, legalizing euthanasia would present it as a viable solution, and in their distress, the family members may selfishly consider it to alleviate the financial burden the patient may…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Duty to Die

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Hardwig believes that “there is a duty to refuse life-prolonging treatment and also a duty to complete advance directives refusing life-prolonging treatment” (35). He holds this view when one’s illness would cause death and even when one would prefer to live. He backs up his argument by reminding us that our actions affect others, not just ourselves, and he believes that our duty to loved ones is greater than our own right to life. He believes that since medical care and treatment can be financially burdensome to our families, if the benefit to the dying is minor in comparison then there is a duty to die to relieve loved ones of this financial burden. Hardwig provides two compelling examples: the case of Captain Oates and the case of the 87-year-old woman with congestive heart failure.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States and countries all over the world, the topic of assisted suicide or euthanasia has become highly controversial because it is hard for people determine if it is moral or not. This became more known and debated about in the public eye in the early ninety’s by the actions of Doctor Jack Kevorkian. He assisted in the deaths of over 130 terminally ill patients all while being in the public spotlight. Assisted suicide is defined as the process by which an individual, who may otherwise be incapable, is provided with the means (drugs or equipment) to commit suicide. In some cases, the terms “aid in dying” or “death in dignity” are preferred. Many patients that are terminally ill have to suffer serious and unbearable pain day in and day out and can do nothing but try and tame the pain until their time is up. Everybody who lives wants to live their life with dignity, and in turn die with dignity. This is being prevented by prolonging the pain and suffering of the patient’s life. It should be the decision of the person whose life it is to determine whether or not they are still actually living with dignity and choose if they want to continue to suffer, affecting not only them but they’re families as well. There are only three states in the U.S. in which assisted suicide is legal, and they have a very rigid guideline to determine who qualifies as terminally ill. The first state to pass a pro euthanasia law was Oregon, followed by Washington and Montana. I believe more states should adopt similar laws because it allows patients who truly desire to end their life in dignity to do so, along with preventing patients that aren’t terminally ill and don’t fit the strict requirements from engaging in physician assisted suicide. The right to die is a fundamental freedom of all people and so is the right to end suffering, which is why it should be legalized and not frowned upon in the eyes of society.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He helped as many people as he could with their final wishes and was unafraid of how this made him look. Kevorkian was more concerned with what the patient wanted and how they were feeling. He had enough mercy and compassion to help them find peace. He continued to do what he believed was right even with all of the negative publicity and imprisonment for a debatable crime. His name, his career, and his legacy was forever changed after being convicted of murder. Kevorkian gave his life to this practice and continued to advocate for it even when he was released from prison. His devotion to the cause is demonstrated by his tombstone that reads “He sacrificed himself for everyone’s rights”(Qtd. in Wilson). Kevorkian made the decision to continue such a controversial practice which ended up helping over a hundred people exercise their right of choosing life or death. He felt so personally connected to this practice because he experienced the suffering of a terminally ill family member. His mother had cancer and at the final stages, he saw it immoral to continue her pain. She was in a coma, weighing very little, and was administered large amounts of painkillers. Kevorkian’s first hand experience negates the claims that he doesn’t understand the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assisted Suicide

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Today’s doctors are now performing what is known as physician-assisted suicide, which is when a doctor sets up a machine, but the patient actually kills him or herself. The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons, and some are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians also take a big role on this issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. The main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide. When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. However for others, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics